Suppr超能文献

白细胞浓度对膝骨关节炎富血小板血浆注射的影响:一项网状Meta分析

The Effect of Leukocyte Concentration on Platelet-Rich Plasma Injections for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Network Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Abbas Aazad, Du Jin Tong, Dhotar Herman S

机构信息

Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, North York General Hospital, University of Toronto, North York, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2022 Mar 16;104(6):559-570. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.20.02258.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

It is hypothesized that leukocyte-poor (LP) platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is preferred over leukocyte-rich (LR) PRP for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis (OA).

METHODS

The MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases were reviewed for all English-language studies comparing LP-PRP or LR-PRP with relevant controls or each other. The follow-up periods were 6 months and 12 months. The primary outcome measure was the change in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score between baseline and follow-up. The secondary outcome measures were changes in the WOMAC pain subscale, visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective score between baseline and follow-up, and the incidence of local adverse reactions. Treatment outcomes were analyzed using the mean difference between treatments for continuous outcomes and the odds ratio for binary outcomes, with 95% credibility intervals. Treatment modalities were ranked using the surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) probabilities. Risk of bias was assessed using the relevant Cochrane tools, RoB 2 (version 2 of the Cochrane risk-of-bias tools) for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and ROBINS-I (Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies - of Interventions) for prospective comparative studies (PCSs).

RESULTS

This network meta-analysis included 23 studies: 20 RCTs and 3 PCSs, with a total of 2,260 patients and a mean follow-up period of 9.9 months. The overall risk-of-bias assessment of the RCTs revealed that 9 studies had low risk, 7 had some concerns, and 4 had high risk. The overall risk-of-bias assessment of the PCSs revealed that 1 study had low risk and 2 had moderate risk. We found no significant (p < 0.05) difference in all outcome measures and local adverse reactions between LP-PRP and LR-PRP. SUCRA rankings revealed that, for all outcome measures, LP-PRP is preferred to LR-PRP across follow-up periods.

CONCLUSIONS

Leukocyte concentration of PRP does not play a significant role in patient-reported outcome measures for knee OA. LP-PRP is preferred to LR-PRP according to SUCRA rankings, but this preference may not be important in clinical practice.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

摘要

背景

据推测,对于膝关节骨关节炎(OA)的治疗,白细胞含量低(LP)的富血小板血浆(PRP)比白细胞含量高(LR)的PRP更具优势。

方法

检索MEDLINE、Embase和Cochrane数据库,查找所有比较LP-PRP或LR-PRP与相关对照或两者之间相互比较的英文研究。随访期为6个月和12个月。主要结局指标是基线至随访期间西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)评分的变化。次要结局指标是基线至随访期间WOMAC疼痛子量表、疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)以及国际膝关节文献委员会(IKDC)主观评分的变化,以及局部不良反应的发生率。对于连续性结局,使用治疗组之间的平均差异进行治疗结局分析;对于二元结局,使用优势比进行分析,并给出95%可信度区间。使用累积排序曲线下面积(SUCRA)概率对治疗方式进行排序。使用相关的Cochrane工具评估偏倚风险,对于随机对照试验(RCT)使用RoB 2(Cochrane偏倚风险工具的第2版),对于前瞻性比较研究(PCS)使用ROBINS-I(非随机干预研究中的偏倚风险)。

结果

该网络荟萃分析纳入了23项研究:20项RCT和3项PCS,共2260例患者,平均随访期为9.9个月。对RCT的总体偏倚风险评估显示,9项研究风险低,7项有一些担忧,4项风险高。对PCS的总体偏倚风险评估显示,1项研究风险低,2项风险中等。我们发现LP-PRP和LR-PRP在所有结局指标和局部不良反应方面均无显著差异(p < 0.05)。SUCRA排名显示,在所有随访期内,对于所有结局指标,LP-PRP比LR-PRP更具优势。

结论

PRP中的白细胞浓度在膝关节OA患者报告的结局指标中不起重要作用。根据SUCRA排名,LP-PRP比LR-PRP更具优势,但这种优势在临床实践中可能并不重要。

证据水平

治疗性II级。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参阅作者指南。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验