• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腰椎间盘突出症治疗的患者偏好:一项离散选择实验

Patient preferences for treatment of lumbar disc herniation: a discrete choice experiment.

作者信息

Gadjradj Pravesh S, Smeele Nicholas V R, de Jong Mandy, Depauw Paul R A M, van Tulder Maurits W, de Bekker-Grob Esther W, Harhangi Biswadjiet S

机构信息

1Department of Neurosurgery, Park MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

2Department of Neurological Surgery, Weill Cornell Brain and Spine Center, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York.

出版信息

J Neurosurg Spine. 2021 Nov 26;36(5):704-712. doi: 10.3171/2021.8.SPINE21995. Print 2022 May 1.

DOI:10.3171/2021.8.SPINE21995
PMID:34826818
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Lumbar discectomy is a frequently performed procedure to treat sciatica caused by lumbar disc herniation. Multiple surgical techniques are available, and the popularity of minimally invasive surgical techniques is increasing worldwide. Clinical outcomes between these techniques may not show any substantial differences. As lumbar discectomy is an elective procedure, patients' own preferences play an important role in determining the procedure they will undergo. The aims of the current study were to determine the relative preference weights patients apply to various attributes of lumbar discectomy, determine if patient preferences change after surgery, identify preference heterogeneity for choosing surgery for sciatica, and calculate patient willingness to pay for other attributes.

METHODS

A discrete choice experiment (DCE) was conducted among patients with sciatica caused by lumbar disc herniation. A questionnaire was administered to patients before they underwent surgery and to an independent sample of patients who had already undergone surgery. The DCE required patients to choose between two surgical techniques or to opt out from 12 choice sets with alternating characteristic levels: waiting time for surgery, out-of-pocket costs, size of the scar, need of general anesthesia, need for hospitalization, effect on leg pain, and duration of the recovery period.

RESULTS

A total of 287 patients were included in the DCE analysis. All attributes, except scar size, had a significant influence on the overall preferences of patients. The effect on leg pain was the most important characteristic in the decision for a surgical procedure (by 44.8%). The potential out-of-pocket costs for the procedure (28.8%), the wait time (12.8%), need for general anesthesia (7.5%), need for hospitalization (4.3%), and the recovery period (1.8%) followed. Preferences were independent of the scores on patient-reported outcome measures and baseline characteristics. Three latent classes could be identified with specific preference patterns. Willingness-to-pay was the highest for effectiveness on leg pain, with patients willing to pay €3133 for a treatment that has a 90% effectiveness instead of 70%.

CONCLUSIONS

Effect on leg pain is the most important factor for patients in deciding to undergo surgery for sciatica. Not all proposed advantages of minimally invasive spine surgery (e.g., size of the scar, no need of general anesthesia) are necessarily perceived as advantages by patients. Spine surgeons should propose surgical techniques for sciatica, not only based on own ability and proposed eligibility, but also based on patient preferences as is part of shared decision making.

摘要

目的

腰椎间盘切除术是治疗腰椎间盘突出症所致坐骨神经痛的常用手术。有多种手术技术可供选择,且微创外科技术在全球范围内的普及程度日益提高。这些技术之间的临床疗效可能并无显著差异。由于腰椎间盘切除术是一种择期手术,患者自身的偏好对于决定他们将接受的手术方式起着重要作用。本研究的目的是确定患者对腰椎间盘切除术各种属性的相对偏好权重,确定患者偏好术后是否改变,识别因坐骨神经痛选择手术的偏好异质性,并计算患者对其他属性的支付意愿。

方法

对腰椎间盘突出症所致坐骨神经痛患者进行了一项离散选择实验(DCE)。在患者手术前及已接受手术的独立患者样本中发放问卷。DCE要求患者在两种手术技术之间进行选择,或从12个具有交替特征水平的选择集中选择退出:手术等待时间、自付费用、疤痕大小、是否需要全身麻醉、是否需要住院、对腿痛的影响以及恢复期时长。

结果

共有287例患者纳入DCE分析。除疤痕大小外,所有属性对患者的总体偏好均有显著影响。对腿痛的影响是手术决策中最重要的特征(占44.8%)。其次是手术的潜在自付费用(2占8.8%)、等待时间(占12.8%)、是否需要全身麻醉(占7.5%)、是否需要住院(占4.3%)以及恢复期(占1.8%)。偏好与患者报告的结局指标得分和基线特征无关。可识别出具有特定偏好模式的三个潜在类别。对腿痛疗效的支付意愿最高,患者愿意为有效率90%而非70%的治疗支付3133欧元。

结论

对腿痛的影响是患者决定接受坐骨神经痛手术的最重要因素。并非微创脊柱手术所有预期的优势(如疤痕大小、无需全身麻醉)患者都必然视为优势。脊柱外科医生在为坐骨神经痛患者推荐手术技术时,不仅应基于自身能力和推荐的适应症,还应基于患者偏好,这是共同决策的一部分。

相似文献

1
Patient preferences for treatment of lumbar disc herniation: a discrete choice experiment.腰椎间盘突出症治疗的患者偏好:一项离散选择实验
J Neurosurg Spine. 2021 Nov 26;36(5):704-712. doi: 10.3171/2021.8.SPINE21995. Print 2022 May 1.
2
Surgeons preference for lumbar disk surgery: a discrete choice experiment.外科医生对腰椎间盘手术的偏好:一项离散选择实验。
Eur Spine J. 2022 Feb;31(2):380-388. doi: 10.1007/s00586-021-06838-9. Epub 2021 Apr 19.
3
Minimally invasive surgical procedures for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation.用于治疗腰椎间盘突出症的微创手术方法。
GMS Health Technol Assess. 2005 Nov 15;1:Doc07.
4
Management of Symptomatic Lumbar Disk Herniation: An International Perspective.腰椎间盘突出症的治疗:国际视角。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017 Dec 1;42(23):1826-1834. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002294.
5
Long-term outcomes of surgical and nonsurgical management of sciatica secondary to a lumbar disc herniation: 10 year results from the maine lumbar spine study.腰椎间盘突出症继发坐骨神经痛的手术与非手术治疗的长期结果:缅因州腰椎研究10年结果
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Apr 15;30(8):927-35. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000158954.68522.2a.
6
Which Factors Are Considered by Patients When Considering Total Joint Arthroplasty? A Discrete-choice Experiment.患者在考虑全关节置换术时会考虑哪些因素?一项离散选择实验。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2023 Mar 1;481(3):427-437. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002358. Epub 2022 Sep 15.
7
Minimally invasive discectomy versus microdiscectomy/open discectomy for symptomatic lumbar disc herniation.微创椎间盘切除术与显微椎间盘切除术/开放椎间盘切除术治疗有症状的腰椎间盘突出症的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Sep 4;2014(9):CD010328. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010328.pub2.
8
What Are Long-term Predictors of Outcomes for Lumbar Disc Herniation? A Randomized and Observational Study.腰椎间盘突出症预后的长期预测因素有哪些?一项随机观察研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Jun;473(6):1920-30. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3803-7.
9
Cost-effectiveness of microendoscopic discectomy versus conventional open discectomy in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation: a prospective randomised controlled trial [ISRCTN51857546].显微内镜下椎间盘切除术与传统开放式椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的成本效益:一项前瞻性随机对照试验[ISRCTN51857546]
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2006 May 13;7:42. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-7-42.
10
Management of sciatica due to lumbar disc herniation in the Netherlands: a survey among spine surgeons.荷兰腰椎间盘突出症所致坐骨神经痛的治疗:脊柱外科医生的一项调查
J Neurosurg Spine. 2008 Jul;9(1):32-9. doi: 10.3171/SPI/2008/9/7/032.

引用本文的文献

1
The Evolving Landscape of Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: A Systematic Review.健康经济学中离散选择实验的发展态势:一项系统综述
Pharmacoeconomics. 2025 May 21. doi: 10.1007/s40273-025-01495-y.
2
Efficacy of repeat discectomy alone versus with spinal fusion in recurrent lumbar disc herniation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized studies.单纯重复椎间盘切除术与联合脊柱融合术治疗复发性腰椎间盘突出症的疗效:一项随机研究的系统评价和荟萃分析
Neurosurg Rev. 2025 May 9;48(1):409. doi: 10.1007/s10143-025-03555-5.
3
Dose-Weighted Network Pharmacology: Evaluating Traditional Chinese Medicine Formulations for Lumbar Disc Herniation.
剂量加权网络药理学:评估用于腰椎间盘突出症的中药配方
J Inflamm Res. 2025 Jan 27;18:1281-1300. doi: 10.2147/JIR.S496124. eCollection 2025.
4
Treatment decision-making factors among patients with cervical myelopathy: a discrete-choice experiment.颈椎脊髓病患者的治疗决策因素:离散选择实验。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2024 Nov 11;8(1):129. doi: 10.1186/s41687-024-00810-z.
5
C-arm-guided versus ultrasound volumetric navigation-guided percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation: A retrospective study.C 臂引导与超声容积导航引导经皮椎间孔内窥镜椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症:一项回顾性研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Oct 11;103(41):e39962. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000039962.
6
Associations of recurrent lumbar disc herniation after percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy with age, body mass index, modic change, disc degeneration and sacral slope: A quantitative review.经皮内镜下腰椎间盘摘除术后复发性腰椎间盘突出症与年龄、体重指数、Modic改变、椎间盘退变及骶骨倾斜度的相关性:一项定量综述
Exp Ther Med. 2024 Mar 11;27(5):195. doi: 10.3892/etm.2024.12483. eCollection 2024 May.
7
Sciatica: predicting who would undergo surgery and who not.坐骨神经痛:预测谁会接受手术以及谁不会。
J Spine Surg. 2022 Dec;8(4):406-408. doi: 10.21037/jss-22-97.
8
Multicenter Retrospective Analysis of Intradiscal Condoliase Injection Therapy for Lumbar Disc Herniation.多中心回顾性分析椎间盘内 CONDOLIASE 注射治疗腰椎间盘突出症。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Sep 15;58(9):1284. doi: 10.3390/medicina58091284.
9
Comparison of Needle-Warming Moxibustion and Other Physical Therapies for Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Meta-analysis.比较温针灸与其他物理疗法治疗腰椎间盘突出症的疗效:一项荟萃分析。
Comput Math Methods Med. 2022 Jul 28;2022:2986223. doi: 10.1155/2022/2986223. eCollection 2022.
10
Clinical Efficacy of Mechanical Traction as Physical Therapy for Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Meta-Analysis.机械牵引作为腰椎间盘突出症物理治疗的临床疗效:一项荟萃分析
Comput Math Methods Med. 2022 Jun 21;2022:5670303. doi: 10.1155/2022/5670303. eCollection 2022.