• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

外科医生对腰椎间盘手术的偏好:一项离散选择实验。

Surgeons preference for lumbar disk surgery: a discrete choice experiment.

作者信息

Gadjradj Pravesh S, Harhangi Biswadjiet S, van Tulder Maurits W, Peul Wilco C, de Bekker-Grob Esther W

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Park MC, Hoofdweg 90, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

Department of Neurosurgery, Erasmus MC: University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur Spine J. 2022 Feb;31(2):380-388. doi: 10.1007/s00586-021-06838-9. Epub 2021 Apr 19.

DOI:10.1007/s00586-021-06838-9
PMID:33876280
Abstract

PURPOSE

Multiple surgical techniques are practiced to treat sciatica caused by lumbar disk herniation. It is unknown which factors surgeons find important when offering certain surgical techniques. The objective of this study is threefold: 1) determine the relative weight surgeons place on various characteristics of sciatica treatment, 2) determine the trade-offs surgeons make between these characteristics and 3) identify preference heterogeneity for sciatica treatment.

METHODS

A discrete choice experiment was conducted among members of two international neurosurgical organizations. Surgeons were asked on their preferences for surgical techniques using specific scenarios based on five characteristics: effectiveness on leg pain, risk of recurrent disk herniation, duration of postoperative back pain, risk of complications and recovery period.

RESULTS

Six-hundred and forty-one questionnaires were filled in, the majority by neurosurgeons. All characteristics significantly influenced the preferences of the respondents. Overall, the risk of complications was the most important characteristic in the decision to opt-in or opt-out for surgery (35.7%). Risk of recurrent disk herniation (19.6%), effectiveness on leg pain (18.8%), postoperative back pain duration (13.5%) and length of recovery period (12.4%) followed. Four latent classes were identified, which was partly explained by the tenure of the surgeon. Surgeons were willing to trade-off 57.8% of effectiveness on leg pain to offer a treatment that has a 1% complication risk instead of 10%.

CONCLUSION

In the context of this discrete choice experiment, it is shown that neurosurgeons consider the risk of complications as most important when a surgical technique is offered to treat sciatica, while the risk of recurrent disk herniation and effectiveness are also important factors. Neurosurgeons were prepared to trade off substantial amounts of effectiveness to achieve lower complication rates.

摘要

目的

多种手术技术用于治疗腰椎间盘突出症引起的坐骨神经痛。目前尚不清楚外科医生在选择特定手术技术时认为哪些因素很重要。本研究的目的有三个:1)确定外科医生对坐骨神经痛治疗各种特征的相对重视程度;2)确定外科医生在这些特征之间所做的权衡;3)识别坐骨神经痛治疗的偏好异质性。

方法

在两个国际神经外科组织的成员中进行了一项离散选择实验。根据腿部疼痛的疗效、椎间盘突出复发风险、术后背痛持续时间、并发症风险和恢复期这五个特征,通过特定场景询问外科医生对手术技术的偏好。

结果

共填写了641份问卷,大多数是神经外科医生填写的。所有特征均显著影响受访者的偏好。总体而言,并发症风险是决定是否选择手术的最重要特征(35.7%)。其次是椎间盘突出复发风险(19.6%)、腿部疼痛疗效(18.8%)、术后背痛持续时间(13.5%)和恢复期长度(12.4%)。识别出四个潜在类别,部分原因可由外科医生的任期来解释。外科医生愿意用57.8%的腿部疼痛疗效来换取一种并发症风险为1%而非10%的治疗方法。

结论

在这项离散选择实验的背景下,研究表明,在提供治疗坐骨神经痛的手术技术时,神经外科医生认为并发症风险最为重要,而椎间盘突出复发风险和疗效也是重要因素。神经外科医生愿意为实现更低的并发症发生率而权衡大量的疗效。

相似文献

1
Surgeons preference for lumbar disk surgery: a discrete choice experiment.外科医生对腰椎间盘手术的偏好:一项离散选择实验。
Eur Spine J. 2022 Feb;31(2):380-388. doi: 10.1007/s00586-021-06838-9. Epub 2021 Apr 19.
2
Management of Symptomatic Lumbar Disk Herniation: An International Perspective.腰椎间盘突出症的治疗:国际视角。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017 Dec 1;42(23):1826-1834. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002294.
3
Patient preferences for treatment of lumbar disc herniation: a discrete choice experiment.腰椎间盘突出症治疗的患者偏好:一项离散选择实验
J Neurosurg Spine. 2021 Nov 26;36(5):704-712. doi: 10.3171/2021.8.SPINE21995. Print 2022 May 1.
4
Surgery versus Conservative Care for Persistent Sciatica Lasting 4 to 12 Months.持续坐骨神经痛 4 至 12 个月的手术与保守治疗比较。
N Engl J Med. 2020 Mar 19;382(12):1093-1102. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1912658.
5
What Are Long-term Predictors of Outcomes for Lumbar Disc Herniation? A Randomized and Observational Study.腰椎间盘突出症预后的长期预测因素有哪些?一项随机观察研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Jun;473(6):1920-30. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3803-7.
6
Long-term outcomes of surgical and nonsurgical management of sciatica secondary to a lumbar disc herniation: 10 year results from the maine lumbar spine study.腰椎间盘突出症继发坐骨神经痛的手术与非手术治疗的长期结果:缅因州腰椎研究10年结果
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Apr 15;30(8):927-35. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000158954.68522.2a.
7
Management of sciatica due to lumbar disc herniation in the Netherlands: a survey among spine surgeons.荷兰腰椎间盘突出症所致坐骨神经痛的治疗:脊柱外科医生的一项调查
J Neurosurg Spine. 2008 Jul;9(1):32-9. doi: 10.3171/SPI/2008/9/7/032.
8
Surgical and nonsurgical management of sciatica secondary to a lumbar disc herniation: five-year outcomes from the Maine Lumbar Spine Study.腰椎间盘突出症继发坐骨神经痛的手术与非手术治疗:缅因州腰椎研究的五年结果
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001 May 15;26(10):1179-87. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200105150-00017.
9
Low-back pain following surgery for lumbar disc herniation. A prospective study.腰椎间盘突出症手术后的下背痛。一项前瞻性研究。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004 May;86(5):893-6. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200405000-00001.
10
Revision for Endoscopic Diskectomy: Is Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion an Option?内镜下椎间盘切除术翻修:侧路腰椎椎体间融合术是否可行?
World Neurosurg. 2020 Jan;133:e26-e30. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.07.226. Epub 2019 Aug 6.

引用本文的文献

1
The Evolving Landscape of Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: A Systematic Review.健康经济学中离散选择实验的发展态势:一项系统综述
Pharmacoeconomics. 2025 May 21. doi: 10.1007/s40273-025-01495-y.
2
Treatment decision-making factors among patients with cervical myelopathy: a discrete-choice experiment.颈椎脊髓病患者的治疗决策因素:离散选择实验。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2024 Nov 11;8(1):129. doi: 10.1186/s41687-024-00810-z.
3
Modeling Optimal Clinical Thresholds for Elective Abdominal Hernia Repair in Patients With Cirrhosis.

本文引用的文献

1
Can healthcare choice be predicted using stated preference data?能否使用意愿调查数据来预测医疗保健选择?
Soc Sci Med. 2020 Feb;246:112736. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112736. Epub 2019 Dec 18.
2
Diagnosis and treatment of sciatica.坐骨神经痛的诊断与治疗
BMJ. 2019 Nov 19;367:l6273. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l6273.
3
Oncologic benefits of dural resection in spinal meningiomas: a meta-analysis of Simpson grades and recurrence rates.脊髓脑膜瘤硬脑膜切除术的肿瘤学益处:辛普森分级与复发率的荟萃分析
肝硬化患者择期行腹外疝修补术的最佳临床阈值建模。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Sep 1;5(9):e2231601. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.31601.
J Neurosurg Spine. 2019 Nov 8;32(3):441-451. doi: 10.3171/2019.8.SPINE19859. Print 2020 Mar 1.
4
A randomised controlled trial of transforaminal endoscopic discectomy vs microdiscectomy.经椎间孔内镜下椎间盘切除术与显微椎间盘切除术的随机对照试验
Eur Spine J. 2017 Mar;26(3):847-856. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4885-6. Epub 2016 Nov 24.
5
Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy for Lumbar Disk Herniation.经皮椎间孔镜下腰椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症
Clin Spine Surg. 2016 Nov;29(9):368-371. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000366.
6
Clinical outcomes after percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a prospective case series.经皮椎间孔镜下腰椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的临床疗效:一项前瞻性病例系列研究
Neurosurg Focus. 2016 Feb;40(2):E3. doi: 10.3171/2015.10.FOCUS15484.
7
A brief history of endoscopic spine surgery.内镜脊柱手术简史。
Neurosurg Focus. 2016 Feb;40(2):E2. doi: 10.3171/2015.11.FOCUS15429.
8
Sample Size Requirements for Discrete-Choice Experiments in Healthcare: a Practical Guide.医疗保健中离散选择实验的样本量要求:实用指南。
Patient. 2015 Oct;8(5):373-84. doi: 10.1007/s40271-015-0118-z.
9
Patient preferences for treatment of low back pain-a discrete choice experiment.患者对腰痛治疗的偏好——一项离散选择实验。
Value Health. 2014 Jun;17(4):390-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2014.01.005. Epub 2014 Apr 21.
10
Minimally invasive surgery for lumbar disc herniation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.微创腰椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Spine J. 2014 May;23(5):1021-43. doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-3161-2. Epub 2014 Jan 18.