Commentary: Avoiding predatory publishing for early career ophthalmologists.
作者信息
Ali Mohammad Javed
机构信息
Govindram Seksaria Institute of Dacryology', L.V. Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
出版信息
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2021 Dec;69(12):3726-3727. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1914_21.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Commentary: Avoiding predatory publishing for early career ophthalmologists.评论：早期职业眼科医生如何避免掠夺性出版行为。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2021 Dec;69(12):3726-3727. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1914_21.
2
Avoiding predatory publishing for early-career ophthalmologists.避免掠夺性出版，以造福早期职业生涯的眼科医生。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2021 Dec;69(12):3719-3725. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1639_21.
3
Avoiding predatory publishing for early career neurosurgeons: what should you know before you submit?避免掠夺性出版：投稿前你应该知道什么？
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2021 Jan;163(1):1-8. doi: 10.1007/s00701-020-04546-9. Epub 2020 Aug 26.
4
Understanding Quality in Research: Avoiding Predatory Journals.理解研究质量：避免掠夺性期刊。
J Hum Lact. 2019 Nov;35(4):661-664. doi: 10.1177/0890334419869912. Epub 2019 Sep 6.
5
Impact of fellowship training on research productivity in academic ophthalmology.专科培训对眼科领域学术研究生产力的影响。
J Surg Educ. 2015 May-Jun;72(3):410-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2014.10.010. Epub 2014 Nov 22.
6
Gender gap and declining surgical activity among new graduates: cataract surgery in Ontario.新毕业医生中的性别差距与手术量下降：安大略省的白内障手术情况
Can J Ophthalmol. 2016 Jun;51(3):154-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2016.04.013.
7
A cross-sectional study of predatory publishing emails received by career development grant awardees.职业发展资助获得者收到的掠夺性出版电子邮件的横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 May 19;9(5):e027928. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027928.
8
Where Are Pediatric Ophthalmologists Submitting Their Manuscripts for Publication?儿科眼科医生将他们的手稿提交到哪里发表？
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2020 Mar 1;57(2):77. doi: 10.3928/01913913-20200218-01.
9
Predatory Publishing: An Emerging Threat to the Medical Literature.掠夺性出版：医学文献的新兴威胁。
Acad Med. 2017 Feb;92(2):150-151. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001521.
10
Gender differences in promotion and scholarly impact: an analysis of 1460 academic ophthalmologists.晋升与学术影响力方面的性别差异：对1460名眼科专科医生的分析
J Surg Educ. 2014 Nov-Dec;71(6):851-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2014.03.015. Epub 2014 May 20.
引用本文的文献
1
Predatory journals: The dark side of publications.掠夺性期刊：出版物的阴暗面。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2022 Aug;70(8):3144-3145. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1053_22.
本文引用的文献
1
Avoiding predatory publishing for early-career ophthalmologists.避免掠夺性出版，以造福早期职业生涯的眼科医生。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2021 Dec;69(12):3719-3725. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1639_21.
2
"Evidence-based checklists" for identifying predatory journals have not been assessed for reliability or validity: An analysis and proposal for moving forward.“基于证据的清单”用于识别掠夺性期刊，但尚未评估其可靠性或有效性：分析与推进建议。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Oct;138:40-48. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.06.015. Epub 2021 Jun 25.
3
Should I include studies from "predatory" journals in a systematic review? Interim guidance for systematic reviewers.我应该在系统评价中纳入来自“掠夺性”期刊的研究吗？系统评价者的临时指南。
JBI Evid Synth. 2021 Aug;19(8):1915-1923. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-21-00138.
4
Dealing with predatory journal articles captured in systematic reviews.处理系统评价中收录的掠夺性期刊文章。
Syst Rev. 2021 Jun 11;10(1):175. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01733-2.
5
Predatory publishing solicitation: a review of a single surgeon's inbox and implications for information technology resources at an organizational level.掠夺性出版征稿：对一位外科医生收件箱的回顾以及对组织层面信息技术资源的影响
Can J Surg. 2021 Jun 9;64(3):E351-E357. doi: 10.1503/cjs.003020.
6
The right to refuse unwanted citations: rethinking the culture of science around the citation.拒绝不当引用的权利：重新思考围绕引用的科学文化。
Scientometrics. 2021;126(6):5355-5360. doi: 10.1007/s11192-021-03960-9. Epub 2021 May 8.
7
Impact factor under attack! Are the criticisms justified?影响因子受到抨击！这些批评合理吗？
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2021 Apr;69(4):790. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_281_21.
8
No room for ambiguity: The concepts of appropriate and inappropriate authorship in scientific publications.不容含糊：科学出版物中署名适当与不适当的概念。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2021 Jan;69(1):36-41. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_2221_20.
9
Defining predatory journals and responding to the threat they pose: a modified Delphi consensus process.界定掠夺性期刊并应对其带来的威胁：一项经过修正的德尔菲共识流程。
BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 9;10(2):e035561. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035561.
Zotero 插件