• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《消极情绪对时间折扣和概率折扣的影响》 (标题中“Effect of...”应译为“……的影响”,但因原文只有标题,推测是标题内容,所以如此翻译使句子完整表意) 。这里原文“": 似乎不太完整或有误,正常标题不应只有引号而无具体内容,但基于现有文本按此方式翻译。 严格来讲,如果“": 部分内容缺失,这样的翻译只能算一种基于形式的推测性处理 。

"": Effect of Negative Emotions on Temporal Discounting and Probability Discounting.

作者信息

Calluso Cinzia, Devetag Maria Giovanna, Donato Carmela

机构信息

Department of Business and Management, Luiss University, Viale Romania 32, 00192 Roma, Italy.

出版信息

Brain Sci. 2021 Oct 25;11(11):1407. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11111407.

DOI:10.3390/brainsci11111407
PMID:34827406
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8615549/
Abstract

Temporal and probability discounting are considered two fundamental constructs in economic science, as they are associated with phenomena with major societal impact and a variety of sub-optimal behaviors and clinical conditions. Although it is well known that positive and negative affective states bear important cognitive/behavioral consequences, the effect of emotional experiences on decision-making remains unclear due to the existence of many conflicting results. Inspired by the need to understand if and to what extent the current COVID-19 pandemic has determined changes in our decision-making processes by means of the unusual, prolonged experience of negative feelings, in this study we investigate the effect of anger, fear, sadness, physical and moral disgust on intertemporal and risky choices. Results show that all emotions significantly increase subjects' preferences for immediate rewards over delayed ones, and for risky rewards over certain ones, in comparison to a "neutral emotion" condition, although the magnitude of the effect differs across emotions. In particular, we observed a more pronounced effect in the case of sadness and moral disgust. These findings contribute to the literature on emotions and decision-making by offering an alternative explanation to the traditional motivational appraisal theories. Specifically, we propose that the increased preference for immediate gratification and risky outcomes serves as a mechanism of self-reward aimed at down-regulating negative feelings and restore the individual's "emotional balance".

摘要

时间折扣和概率折扣被认为是经济科学中的两个基本概念,因为它们与具有重大社会影响的现象以及各种次优行为和临床状况相关联。尽管众所周知,积极和消极的情感状态会产生重要的认知/行为后果,但由于存在许多相互矛盾的结果,情感体验对决策的影响仍不明确。受理解当前新冠疫情是否以及在多大程度上通过异常、长期的负面情绪体验导致我们决策过程发生变化这一需求的启发,在本研究中,我们调查了愤怒、恐惧、悲伤、身体厌恶和道德厌恶对跨期选择和风险选择的影响。结果表明,与“中性情绪”条件相比,所有情绪都会显著增加受试者对即时奖励而非延迟奖励、对风险奖励而非确定奖励的偏好,尽管不同情绪的影响程度有所不同。特别是,我们在悲伤和道德厌恶的情况下观察到了更明显的影响。这些发现通过为传统动机评估理论提供另一种解释,为情感与决策的文献做出了贡献。具体而言,我们提出对即时满足和风险结果的偏好增加是一种自我奖励机制,旨在下调负面情绪并恢复个体的“情绪平衡”。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12a4/8615549/16e38ff54b8a/brainsci-11-01407-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12a4/8615549/c338974ee16b/brainsci-11-01407-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12a4/8615549/01471dc2db7e/brainsci-11-01407-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12a4/8615549/61abd3fb22ab/brainsci-11-01407-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12a4/8615549/ae8fdbd31e89/brainsci-11-01407-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12a4/8615549/16e38ff54b8a/brainsci-11-01407-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12a4/8615549/c338974ee16b/brainsci-11-01407-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12a4/8615549/01471dc2db7e/brainsci-11-01407-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12a4/8615549/61abd3fb22ab/brainsci-11-01407-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12a4/8615549/ae8fdbd31e89/brainsci-11-01407-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12a4/8615549/16e38ff54b8a/brainsci-11-01407-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
"": Effect of Negative Emotions on Temporal Discounting and Probability Discounting.《消极情绪对时间折扣和概率折扣的影响》 (标题中“Effect of...”应译为“……的影响”,但因原文只有标题,推测是标题内容,所以如此翻译使句子完整表意) 。这里原文“": 似乎不太完整或有误,正常标题不应只有引号而无具体内容,但基于现有文本按此方式翻译。 严格来讲,如果“": 部分内容缺失,这样的翻译只能算一种基于形式的推测性处理 。
Brain Sci. 2021 Oct 25;11(11):1407. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11111407.
2
Gender differences in the effects of emotion induction on intertemporal decision-making.情绪诱导对跨期决策的影响的性别差异。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 20;19(3):e0299591. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299591. eCollection 2024.
3
The value of emotion: how does episodic prospection modulate delay discounting?情感的价值:情景式前瞻如何调节延迟折扣?
PLoS One. 2013 Nov 28;8(11):e81717. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081717. eCollection 2013.
4
Does sadness bring myopia: an intertemporal choice experiment with college students.悲伤会导致近视吗:一项针对大学生的跨期选择实验
Front Psychol. 2024 Apr 26;15:1345951. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1345951. eCollection 2024.
5
Music-induced emotions influence intertemporal decision making.音乐诱发的情绪会影响跨期决策。
Cogn Emot. 2022 Mar;36(2):211-229. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2021.1995331. Epub 2021 Oct 27.
6
Emotional arousal and discount rate in intertemporal choice are reference dependent.跨期选择中的情绪唤醒和贴现率依赖于参照点。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2015 Apr;144(2):366-73. doi: 10.1037/xge0000047. Epub 2015 Jan 19.
7
Incidental emotions in moral dilemmas: the influence of emotion regulation.道德困境中的偶然情绪:情绪调节的影响
Cogn Emot. 2015;29(1):64-75. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2014.895300. Epub 2014 Mar 10.
8
GABA receptors in prelimbic cortex and basolateral amygdala differentially influence intertemporal decision making and decline with age.前额皮质和外侧杏仁核中的 GABA 受体对跨期决策有不同的影响,并随年龄增长而衰退。
Neuropharmacology. 2022 May 15;209:109001. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2022.109001. Epub 2022 Feb 19.
9
Emotional arousal predicts intertemporal choice.情绪唤起能预测跨期选择。
Emotion. 2016 Aug;16(5):647-56. doi: 10.1037/emo0000168. Epub 2016 Feb 15.
10
The impact of anger on intertemporal decision-making in individuals with internet addiction: an fNIRS study.愤怒对网络成瘾个体跨期决策的影响:一项功能近红外光谱研究。
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2024 Sep 3. doi: 10.1007/s00406-024-01882-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Transcranial direct current stimulation alleviates the negative impact of immediate and chronic social exclusion on intertemporal decision-making.经颅直流电刺激可减轻即时和长期社会排斥对跨期决策的负面影响。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2025 Jan 18;20(1). doi: 10.1093/scan/nsaf065.
2
How mood-related physiological states bias economic decisions.情绪相关的生理状态如何影响经济决策。
Commun Psychol. 2025 Apr 4;3(1):55. doi: 10.1038/s44271-025-00241-6.
3
A multinational analysis of how emotions relate to economic decisions regarding time or risk.

本文引用的文献

1
Temporal Discounting Impulsivity and Its Association with Conduct Disorder and Irritability.时间折扣冲动及其与品行障碍和易激惹的关系。
J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2020 Nov;30(9):542-548. doi: 10.1089/cap.2020.0001. Epub 2020 Sep 2.
2
Cognitive dynamics of intertemporal choice in gambling disorder.赌博障碍中跨期选择的认知动态
Addict Behav. 2020 Oct;109:106463. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106463. Epub 2020 May 8.
3
Disgust selectively dampens value-independent risk-taking for potential gains.厌恶感会有选择地抑制潜在收益的与价值无关的风险承担。
一项关于情绪如何与时间或风险的经济决策相关的跨国分析。
Nat Hum Behav. 2024 Nov;8(11):2139-2155. doi: 10.1038/s41562-024-01927-3. Epub 2024 Aug 29.
4
Does sadness bring myopia: an intertemporal choice experiment with college students.悲伤会导致近视吗:一项针对大学生的跨期选择实验
Front Psychol. 2024 Apr 26;15:1345951. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1345951. eCollection 2024.
5
A mini-review on how the COVID-19 pandemic affected intertemporal choice.关于新冠疫情如何影响跨期选择的一篇小型综述。
Psychoradiology. 2023 Oct 10;3:kkad021. doi: 10.1093/psyrad/kkad021. eCollection 2023.
6
Mood fluctuations shift cost-benefit tradeoffs in economic decisions.情绪波动改变了经济决策中的成本效益权衡。
Sci Rep. 2023 Oct 24;13(1):18173. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-45217-w.
Cognition. 2020 Jul;200:104266. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104266. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
4
Sadness, but not all negative emotions, heightens addictive substance use.悲伤,但并非所有消极情绪,都会增强对成瘾物质的使用。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Jan 14;117(2):943-949. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1909888116. Epub 2019 Dec 30.
5
Concreteness and emotional valence of episodic future thinking (EFT) independently affect the dynamics of intertemporal decisions.情景式未来思维(EFT)的具体性和情绪效价独立影响跨期决策的动态变化。
PLoS One. 2019 May 28;14(5):e0217224. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217224. eCollection 2019.
6
Cognitive load and emotional processing in psoriasis: a thermal imaging study.银屑病中的认知负荷与情绪加工:一项热成像研究。
Exp Brain Res. 2019 Jan;237(1):211-222. doi: 10.1007/s00221-018-5416-y. Epub 2018 Oct 29.
7
Disgust as a mechanism for decision making under risk: Illuminating sex differences and individual risk-taking correlates of disgust propensity.厌恶作为风险决策的一种机制:揭示性别差异和个体风险偏好相关的厌恶倾向。
Emotion. 2018 Oct;18(7):942-958. doi: 10.1037/emo0000389. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
8
Can you change my preferences? Effect of social influence on intertemporal choice behavior.你能改变我的偏好吗?社会影响对跨期选择行为的作用。
Behav Brain Res. 2017 Jul 14;330:78-84. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2017.05.001. Epub 2017 May 3.
9
Anxious Individuals Are Impulsive Decision-Makers in the Delay Discounting Task: An ERP Study.焦虑个体在延迟折扣任务中是冲动的决策者:一项事件相关电位研究。
Front Behav Neurosci. 2017 Jan 24;11:5. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2017.00005. eCollection 2017.
10
Beyond Purity.超越纯粹。
Psychol Sci. 2017 Jan;28(1):80-91. doi: 10.1177/0956797616673193. Epub 2016 Dec 8.