Simeoni Rossella, Colonnelli Federico, Eutizi Veronica, Marchetti Matteo, Paolini Elena, Papalini Valentina, Punturo Alessio, Salvò Alice, Scipinotti Nicoletta, Serpente Christian, Barbini Emanuele, Troscia Riccardo, Maccioni Giovanni, Giansanti Daniele
Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, San Martino al Cimino, 01100 Viterbo, Italy.
Centre Tisp, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Oct 27;9(11):1454. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9111454.
: We are witnessing two phenomena. The first is that the physiotherapist is increasingly becoming a figure that must interact with Digital Health. On the other hand, social robots through research are improving more and more in the aspects of social interaction thanks also to artificial intelligence and becoming useful in rehabilitation processes. It begins to become strategic to investigate the intersections between these two phenomena. : Therefore, we set ourselves the goal of investigating the consensus and opinion of physiotherapists around the introduction of social robots in clinical practice both in rehabilitation and assistance. : An electronic survey has been developed focused on social robot-based rehabilitation and assistance and has been submitted to subjects focused on physiotherapy sciences to investigate their opinion and their level of consent regarding the use of the social robot in rehabilitation and assistance. Two samples of subjects were recruited: the first group (156 participating subjects, 79 males, 77 females, mean age 24.3 years) was in the training phase, and the second (167 participating subjects, 86 males, 81 females, mean age 42.4 years) group was involved in the work processes. An electronic feedback form was also submitted to investigate the acceptance of the proposed methodology. : The survey showed a consistency of the results between the two samples from which interesting considerations emerge. Contrary to stereotypes that report how AI-based devices put jobs at risk, physiotherapists are not afraid of these devices. The subjects involved in the study believe the following: (a) social robots can be reliable co-workers but will remain a complementary device; (b) their role will be of the utmost importance as an operational manager in their use and in performance monitoring; (c) these devices will allow an increase in working capacity and facilitate integration. All those involved in the study believe that the proposed electronic survey has proved to be a useful and effective tool that can be useful as a periodic monitoring tool and useful for scientific societies. : The evolution of social robots represents an unstoppable process as does the increase in the aging of the population. Stakeholders must not look with suspicion toward these devices, which can represent an important resource, but rather invest in monitoring and consensus training initiatives.
我们正在见证两种现象。第一种是物理治疗师越来越成为一个必须与数字健康互动的角色。另一方面,通过研究,社交机器人在社交互动方面借助人工智能越来越完善,并在康复过程中变得有用。研究这两种现象之间的交叉点开始变得具有战略意义。
因此,我们给自己设定了一个目标,即调查物理治疗师对于在康复和护理的临床实践中引入社交机器人的共识和意见。
我们开展了一项电子调查,该调查聚焦于基于社交机器人的康复和护理,并已提交给专注于物理治疗科学的受试者,以调查他们对于在康复和护理中使用社交机器人的意见和同意程度。招募了两组受试者:第一组(156名参与受试者,79名男性,77名女性,平均年龄24.3岁)处于培训阶段,第二组(167名参与受试者,86名男性,81名女性,平均年龄42.4岁)参与工作流程。还提交了一份电子反馈表以调查对所提议方法的接受程度。
调查显示两个样本的结果具有一致性,从中出现了一些有趣的考量。与那种认为基于人工智能的设备会使工作面临风险的刻板印象相反,物理治疗师并不害怕这些设备。参与研究的受试者认为:(a)社交机器人可以成为可靠的同事,但仍将是一种辅助设备;(b)它们作为操作管理者在使用和性能监测方面的作用将至关重要;(c)这些设备将提高工作能力并促进融合。所有参与研究的人都认为所提议的电子调查已被证明是一种有用且有效的工具,可作为定期监测工具,对科学协会也有用。
社交机器人的发展如同人口老龄化加剧一样是一个不可阻挡的过程。利益相关者不应怀疑这些可能代表重要资源的设备,而应投资于监测和共识培训举措。