Center for Dementia Care, Institute of Applied Nursing Sciences, Department of Health, University of Applied Sciences FHS St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
International Graduate Academy, Institute for Health and Nursing Science, Medical Faculty, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany.
J Alzheimers Dis. 2021;79(2):773-792. doi: 10.3233/JAD-200347.
Using non-pharmacological interventions is a current approach in dementia care to manage responsive behaviors, to maintain functional capacity, and to reduce emotional stress. Novel technologies such as social robot interventions might be useful to engage people with dementia in activities and interactions as well as to improve their cognitive, emotional, and physical status.
Assessing the effects and the quality of reporting of social robot interventions for people with dementia.
In our systematic review, we included quasi-experimental and experimental studies published in English, French, or German, irrespective of publication year. Searching CINAHL, Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Web of Science Core Collection was supplemented by citation tracking and free web searching. To assess the methodological quality of included studies, we used tools provided by the Joanna Briggs Institute. To assess the reporting of the interventions, we applied CReDECI 2 and TIDieR.
We identified sixteen studies published between 2012 and 2018, including two to 415 participants with mostly non-defined type of dementia. Eight studies had an experimental design. The predominant robot types were pet robots (i.e., PARO). Most studies addressed behavioral, emotion-related, and functional outcomes with beneficial, non-beneficial, and mixed results. Predominantly, cognitive outcomes were not improved. Overall, studies were of moderate methodological quality.
Heterogeneous populations, intervention characteristics, and measured outcomes make it difficult to generalize the results with regard to clinical practice. The impact of social robot interventions on behavioral, emotion-related, and functional outcomes should therefore be assessed considering the severity of dementia and intervention characteristics.
在痴呆症护理中,使用非药物干预措施是一种当前的方法,用于管理反应性行为,维持功能能力,并减轻情绪压力。新型技术,如社交机器人干预,可能有助于使痴呆症患者参与活动和互动,以及改善他们的认知、情感和身体状况。
评估社交机器人干预对痴呆症患者的效果和报告质量。
在我们的系统综述中,我们纳入了发表在英语、法语或德语中的准实验和实验研究,无论发表年份如何。在 CINAHL、Cochrane 图书馆、MEDLINE、PsycINFO 和 Web of Science Core Collection 进行搜索,并辅以引文追踪和免费网络搜索。为了评估纳入研究的方法学质量,我们使用了 Joanna Briggs 研究所提供的工具。为了评估干预措施的报告,我们应用了 CReDECI 2 和 TIDieR。
我们确定了十六项发表于 2012 年至 2018 年之间的研究,包括两项至 415 名参与者,主要患有未定义类型的痴呆症。八项研究采用了实验设计。主要的机器人类型是宠物机器人(即 PARO)。大多数研究针对行为、情绪相关和功能结果,结果有益、无益和混合。认知结果主要没有改善。总体而言,研究的方法学质量为中等。
异质的人群、干预特点和测量结果使得难以将结果推广到临床实践中。因此,应考虑痴呆症的严重程度和干预特点,评估社交机器人干预对行为、情绪相关和功能结果的影响。