Suppr超能文献

阿霉素与甲氨蝶呤联合药物治疗的随机对照试验。

A randomized comparative trial of adriamycin versus methotrexate in combination drug therapy.

作者信息

Bull J M, Tormey D C, Li S H, Carbone P P, Falkson G, Blom J, Perlin E, Simon R

出版信息

Cancer. 1978 May;41(5):1649-57. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(197805)41:5<1649::aid-cncr2820410501>3.0.co;2-j.

Abstract

A prospective randomized trial was conducted comparing the clinical response of 78 previously untreated patients with advanced metastatic breast cancer to a combination of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) or to a combination of cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, and 5-fluorouracil (CAF). Sixty-two percent of the patients receiving CMF responded to treatment compared to an 82% response rate for the patients receiving CAF. Although within acceptable limits, hematologic and GI toxicity was greater with CAF. There was no significant difference in the duration of response to the two regimens. Therefore, the therapeutic difference between the two therapies is a higher initial response rate to the adriamycin containing regimen.

摘要

进行了一项前瞻性随机试验,比较78例先前未接受治疗的晚期转移性乳腺癌患者对环磷酰胺、甲氨蝶呤和5-氟尿嘧啶(CMF)联合治疗或环磷酰胺、阿霉素和5-氟尿嘧啶(CAF)联合治疗的临床反应。接受CMF治疗的患者中有62%对治疗有反应,而接受CAF治疗的患者的反应率为82%。虽然在可接受范围内,但CAF的血液学和胃肠道毒性更大。两种治疗方案的反应持续时间没有显著差异。因此,两种治疗方法之间的治疗差异在于含阿霉素方案的初始反应率更高。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验