Armbruster Marco, Guba Markus, Andrassy Joachim, Rentsch Markus, Schwarze Vincent, Rübenthaler Johannes, Knösel Thomas, Ricke Jens, Kramer Harald
Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany.
Department of General, Visceral, Vascular, and Transplant Surgery, Medical Center of the University of Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Oct 28;11(11):2002. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11112002.
The aim of this paper was to assess and compare the accuracy of common magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) pulse sequences in measuring the lesion sizes of hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) with respect to the Milan criteria and histopathology as a standard of reference.
We included 45 patients with known HCC who underwent contrast-enhanced MRI of the liver prior to liver transplantation or tumor resection. Tumor size was assessed pathologically for all patients. The MRI protocol contained axial T2-weighted images as well as T1-weighted imaging sequences before and after application of Gd-EOB-DTPA. Tumor diameters, the sharpness of lesions, and the presence of artifacts were evaluated visually on all available MRI sequences. MRI measurements and pathologically assessed tumor dimensions were correlated using Pearson's correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman plots. The rate of misclassifications following Milan criteria was assessed.
The mean absolute error (in cm) of MRI size measurements in comparison to pathology was the smallest for the hepatobiliary phase T1-weighted acquisition (0.71 ± 0.70 cm, r = 0.96) and largest for the T2w turbo-spin-echo (TSE) sequence (0.85 ± 0.78 cm, r = 0.94). The misclassification rate regarding tumor size under the Milan criteria was lowest for the T2w half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin-echo sequence and the hepatobiliary phase T1w acquisition (each 8.6%). The highest rate of misclassification occurred in the portal venous phase T1w acquisition and T2w TSE sequence (each 14.3%).
The hepatobiliary phase T1-weighted acquisition seems to be most accurate among commonly used MRI sequences for measuring HCC tumor size, resulting in low rates of misclassification with respect to the Milan criteria.
本文旨在评估和比较常见磁共振成像(MRI)脉冲序列在测量肝细胞癌(HCC)病变大小方面的准确性,并以米兰标准和组织病理学作为参考标准。
我们纳入了45例已知患有HCC的患者,这些患者在肝移植或肿瘤切除术前接受了肝脏对比增强MRI检查。对所有患者的肿瘤大小进行了病理评估。MRI检查方案包括轴向T2加权图像以及注射钆塞酸二钠(Gd-EOB-DTPA)前后的T1加权成像序列。在所有可用的MRI序列上,通过视觉评估肿瘤直径、病变的清晰度和伪影的存在情况。使用Pearson相关系数和Bland-Altman图对MRI测量值与病理评估的肿瘤尺寸进行相关性分析。评估符合米兰标准后的错误分类率。
与病理学相比,MRI大小测量的平均绝对误差(单位:厘米)在肝胆期T1加权采集时最小(0.71±0.70厘米,r = 0.96),在T2加权快速自旋回波(TSE)序列时最大(0.85±0.78厘米,r = 0.94)。根据米兰标准,T2加权半傅里叶采集单次激发快速自旋回波序列和肝胆期T1加权采集的肿瘤大小错误分类率最低(均为8.6%)。错误分类率最高的是门静脉期T1加权采集和T2加权TSE序列(均为14.3%)。
在常用的MRI序列中,肝胆期T1加权采集在测量HCC肿瘤大小方面似乎最准确,相对于米兰标准,错误分类率较低。