Dziedzic Arkadiusz, Riad Abanoub, Attia Sameh, Klugar Miloslav, Tanasiewicz Marta
Department of Restorative Dentistry with Endodontics, Medical University of Silesia, 40-055 Katowice, Poland.
Czech National Centre for Evidence-Based Healthcare and Knowledge Translation, Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Kamenice 5, 625 00 Brno, Czech Republic.
J Clin Med. 2021 Nov 16;10(22):5338. doi: 10.3390/jcm10225338.
Optimization of COVID-19 vaccination rate among healthcare personnel is of utmost priority to secure provision of uninterrupted care and to protect the most vulnerable patients. This study, as part of the global CoVaST project, aimed to assess the occurrence of short-term adverse events (SRAEs) of two most administered COVID-19 vaccines, mRNA-based (Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna) and viral vector-based (AstraZeneca) in healthcare sector workers (HWs).
A cross-sectional survey-based study was carried out for the first time among 317 Polish healthcare sector personnel and medical students using a validated and pre-tested questionnaire. The online questionnaire included 25 pre-tested, validated questions concerning demographic data, medical parameters, COVID-19-related anamneses, and local or systemic reactions (reactogenicity) associated with COVID-19 vaccination. Descriptive statistics, inferential tests and binary logistic regression were performed.
Out of the 247 participating HWs, 79.8% were females, and 77.5% received mRNA-based vaccines, while 24.5% received a viral vector-based vaccine. Cumulatively, 78.9% and 60.7% of the participants reported at least one local and one systemic SRAE respectively, following their COVID-19 first or second dose of vaccine. A wide array of SRAEs was observed, while pain at injection site (76.9%) was the most common local SRAE, and fatigue (46.2%), headache (37.7%), muscle pain (31.6%) were the most common systemic SRAEs. The vast proportion of local (35.2%) and systemic (44.8%) SRAEs subsided up to 1 day after inoculation with both types of vaccines. The mRNA-based vaccine versions seem to cause higher prevalence of local SRAEs, mainly pain within injection site (81.3% vs. 71.7%; = 0.435), while the viral vector-based vaccine was linked with increased incidents of mild systemic side effects (76.7% vs. 55.3%; = 0.004) after both doses. Pooled analysis revealed uniform results while comparing the prevalence of SRAEs in HWs as recipients in four central European countries (OR = 2.38; 95% CI = 2.03-2.79).
The study confirmed the safety of commonly administered vaccines against COVID-19, which were associated with mild, self-resolving adverse events. No major vaccine-related incidents were reported which would affect every day functioning, significantly. The younger age group (below 29 y.o.) were associated with an increased risk of adverse events generally. The results enhanced current data regarding COVID-19 vaccination active surveillance in selected occupational groups.
优化医护人员的新冠疫苗接种率是确保提供不间断医疗服务以及保护最脆弱患者的重中之重。作为全球CoVaST项目的一部分,本研究旨在评估两种最常用的新冠疫苗,即基于信使核糖核酸的(辉瑞 - 生物科技公司和莫德纳公司生产)和基于病毒载体的(阿斯利康公司生产),在医疗行业工作者(HWs)中短期不良事件(SRAEs)的发生情况。
首次对317名波兰医疗行业人员和医学生进行了一项基于横断面调查的研究,使用经过验证和预测试的问卷。在线问卷包括25个经过预测试和验证的问题,涉及人口统计学数据、医学参数、与新冠病毒相关的既往史,以及与新冠疫苗接种相关的局部或全身反应(反应原性)。进行了描述性统计、推断性测试和二元逻辑回归分析。
在247名参与研究的HWs中,79.8%为女性,77.5%接种了基于信使核糖核酸的疫苗,而24.5%接种了基于病毒载体的疫苗。累计而言,78.9%和60.7%的参与者在接种第一剂或第二剂新冠疫苗后分别报告了至少一种局部和一种全身SRAE。观察到了各种各样的SRAEs,其中注射部位疼痛(76.9%)是最常见的局部SRAE,疲劳(46.2%)、头痛(37.7%)、肌肉疼痛(31.6%)是最常见的全身SRAEs。两种疫苗接种后,大部分局部(35.2%)和全身(44.8%)SRAEs在接种后1天内消退。基于信使核糖核酸的疫苗版本似乎导致局部SRAEs的发生率更高,主要是注射部位疼痛(81.3%对71.7%;P = 0.435),而基于病毒载体的疫苗在两剂接种后与轻度全身副作用的发生率增加有关(76.7%对55.3%;P = 0.004)。汇总分析显示,在比较四个中欧国家作为接受者的HWs中SRAEs的发生率时结果一致(比值比 = 2.38;95%置信区间 = 2.03 - 2.79)。
该研究证实了常用新冠疫苗的安全性,这些疫苗与轻度、可自行缓解的不良事件相关。未报告会显著影响日常功能的重大疫苗相关事件。年龄较小的年龄组(29岁以下)总体上与不良事件风险增加有关。研究结果丰富了有关特定职业群体新冠疫苗接种主动监测的现有数据。