• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

韩国化工事故预防体系修订后中型电镀和涂料制造工厂的风险变化。

Changes in Risk in Medium Business Plating and Paint Manufacturing Plants following the Revision of the Korean Chemical Accident Prevention System.

机构信息

Department of Health Science, Korea University, Anam-ro 145, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul 02841, Korea.

Department of Health and Safety Convergence Science, Korea University, Anam-ro 145, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul 02841, Korea.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 15;18(22):11982. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182211982.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph182211982
PMID:34831738
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8619180/
Abstract

Chemical accidents can occur anywhere. The need for chemical management in Korea was realized following the 2012 Gumi hydrofluoric acid accident in 2012. The Chemicals Control Act was enacted in 2015. This system evaluates the risks (high, medium, low) and consequent safety management at all plants that handle hazardous chemical substances. However, the system was criticized as excessive when most plants were designated high-risk without considering their size. Thus, laboratories and hospitals handling very small quantities were subject to regulation. Accordingly, in 2021 Korea revised the system to include off-site consequence analyses and a Korean-style risk analysis. Plants handling very small quantities, such as laboratories and hospitals, were exempt from regulation. In this study, changes in risk were examined for four medium-sized plating and paint manufacturing plants. Under the previous system, all four factories were judged as high-risk groups. In particular, the paint manufacturing plant A, which has an underground storage tank, received a medium risk like the plating plant C, although the possibility of a chemical accident was lower than that of other plants. However, in the changed system, all plants were changed to the low-risk group. In the Korean-style risk analysis, it is possible to see at a glance what is lacking in the plants, such as cooperation between local residents and local governments and the construction of safety facilities according to the type of accident scenario. The revised system is a reasonable regulation for medium business plants.

摘要

化学事故可能发生在任何地方。2012 年韩国古米氢氟酸事故后,人们意识到需要对化学品进行管理。2015 年颁布了《化学品控制法》。该系统对所有处理危险化学品物质的工厂进行风险(高、中、低)评估和相应的安全管理。然而,由于大多数工厂在不考虑其规模的情况下被指定为高风险,因此该系统被批评为过度。因此,实验室和医院处理非常少量的危险化学品也受到监管。因此,2021 年韩国修订了该系统,纳入了场外后果分析和韩国式风险分析。处理非常少量危险化学品的实验室和医院等工厂被豁免监管。在这项研究中,对四家中型电镀和油漆制造工厂的风险变化进行了检验。在以前的系统下,所有四家工厂都被判定为高风险群体。特别是地下储罐的油漆制造厂 A 被判定为中风险,就像电镀厂 C 一样,尽管发生化学事故的可能性低于其他工厂。然而,在变更后的系统中,所有工厂都被归类为低风险群体。在韩国式风险分析中,可以一目了然地看到工厂存在的不足,例如根据事故场景类型,当地居民和地方政府之间的合作以及安全设施的建设。修订后的系统是对中型企业工厂的合理监管。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f6c/8619180/91e5ea7d3d14/ijerph-18-11982-g005a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f6c/8619180/7fd2ad0ccbd5/ijerph-18-11982-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f6c/8619180/00eac69d1f1b/ijerph-18-11982-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f6c/8619180/c15d770638bb/ijerph-18-11982-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f6c/8619180/16bc02a938de/ijerph-18-11982-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f6c/8619180/91e5ea7d3d14/ijerph-18-11982-g005a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f6c/8619180/7fd2ad0ccbd5/ijerph-18-11982-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f6c/8619180/00eac69d1f1b/ijerph-18-11982-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f6c/8619180/c15d770638bb/ijerph-18-11982-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f6c/8619180/16bc02a938de/ijerph-18-11982-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f6c/8619180/91e5ea7d3d14/ijerph-18-11982-g005a.jpg

相似文献

1
Changes in Risk in Medium Business Plating and Paint Manufacturing Plants following the Revision of the Korean Chemical Accident Prevention System.韩国化工事故预防体系修订后中型电镀和涂料制造工厂的风险变化。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 15;18(22):11982. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182211982.
2
Feasibility Evaluation of Designated Quantities for Chemicals Requiring Preparation for Accidents in the Korean Chemical Accident Prevention System.韩国化学事故预防体系中要求事故预备的化学品指定数量的可行性评估。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 16;17(6):1927. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17061927.
3
Alternative Risk Assessment for Dangerous Chemicals in South Korea Regulation: Comparing Three Modeling Programs.韩国危险化学品法规中的替代风险评估:三种建模程序比较。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Jul 28;15(8):1600. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15081600.
4
Emergency Evacuation Plan for Hazardous Chemicals Leakage Accidents Using GIS-based Risk Analysis Techniques in South Korea.韩国使用基于 GIS 的风险分析技术的危险化学品泄漏事故应急疏散计划。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jun 1;16(11):1948. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16111948.
5
Valuation of Estimation Toxic Chemical Release Inventory Method-Focusing on Paint Manufacturing Process.估算有毒化学物质排放清单方法的评估——以涂料制造过程为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Sep 5;16(18):3260. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16183260.
6
Development and Verification of a Risk Index for Evaluating the Chemical Accident Risk of Korean Chemical Enterprises.韩国化工企业化学品事故风险评估风险指数的开发与验证。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Nov 11;16(22):4409. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16224409.
7
Use and limitations of offsite consequence analysis tools from South Korea and the United States in hydrogen fluoride accidental release.韩国和美国的场外后果分析工具在氟化氢意外泄漏中的应用与局限性
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2018 Mar;14(2):205-211. doi: 10.1002/ieam.2019. Epub 2018 Jan 17.
8
Survey of awareness about hazardous chemicals of residents living near chemical plants in South Korea.韩国化工园区周边居民对危险化学品认知情况调查。
Ind Health. 2018 Jul 27;56(4):285-291. doi: 10.2486/indhealth.2017-0119. Epub 2018 Mar 10.
9
Classification of Human Failure in Chemical Plants: Case Study of Various Types of Chemical Accidents in South Korea from 2010 to 2017.化工企业人员失误分类:以 2010 年至 2017 年韩国各类化工事故为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 26;18(21):11216. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182111216.
10
Characteristics and Statistical Analysis of Large and above Hazardous Chemical Accidents in China from 2000 to 2020.2000 年至 2020 年中国较大及以上危险化学品事故特征及统计分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 24;19(23):15603. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192315603.

引用本文的文献

1
A chemical accident cause text mining method based on improved accident triangle.基于改进事故三角形的化学事故成因文本挖掘方法
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jan 2;24(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-17510-w.
2
Numerical Investigation of Overtopping Prevention for Optimal Safety Dike Design.数值研究最优安全堤设计的防越浪措施。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 7;19(24):16429. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192416429.

本文引用的文献

1
Flammable Substances in Korea Considering the Domino Effect: Assessment of Safety Distance.考虑多米诺效应的韩国易燃物质:安全距离评估。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Mar 18;16(6):969. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16060969.
2
Alternative Risk Assessment for Dangerous Chemicals in South Korea Regulation: Comparing Three Modeling Programs.韩国危险化学品法规中的替代风险评估:三种建模程序比较。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Jul 28;15(8):1600. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15081600.
3
Domino effect in chemical accidents: main features and accident sequences.
化学事故中的多米诺效应:主要特征和事故序列。
J Hazard Mater. 2010 Nov 15;183(1-3):565-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.07.061. Epub 2010 Jul 21.
4
Bhopal Gas Tragedy: review of clinical and experimental findings after 25 years.博帕尔毒气惨案:25年后临床与实验结果回顾
Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2009;22(3):193-202. doi: 10.2478/v10001-009-0028-1.
5
Layer of protection analysis for reactive chemical risk assessment.
J Hazard Mater. 2008 Nov 15;159(1):19-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.06.105. Epub 2008 Jul 3.