Suppr超能文献

回顾性比较新鲜和冷冻解冻单囊胚移植的妊娠结局:5 年单中心经验。

Retrospective comparison of pregnancy outcomes of fresh and frozen-warmed single blastocyst transfer: a 5-year single-center experience.

机构信息

Division of Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Department of Gynecology, Fertility Center, Humanitas Research Hospital, IRCCS, Via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.

Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4Pieve Emanuele, 20090, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

J Assist Reprod Genet. 2022 Jan;39(1):201-209. doi: 10.1007/s10815-021-02362-3. Epub 2021 Nov 26.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To assess whether live birth rates (LBR) and maternal/neonatal complications differed following single fresh and frozen-warmed blastocyst transfer.

METHODS

The present retrospective observational study analyzed 4,613 single embryo transfers (SET) (646 fresh and 3,967 frozen) from January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2018. Fresh embryo transfer at blastocyst stage was considered according to the age of the patient and her prognosis. In case of the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, premature progesterone rise, non-optimal endometrial growth, or supernumerary embryos, cryopreservation with subsequent frozen embryo transfer (FET) was indicated.

RESULTS

No differences in LBR were recorded. Fresh embryo transfers yielded an increase both in neonatal complications OR 2.15 (95% CI 1.20-3.86, p 0.010), with a higher prevalence of singletons weighting below the 5th percentile (p 0.013) and of intrauterine growth retardation (p 0.015), as well as maternal complications, with a higher placenta previa occurrence OR 3.58 (95% CI 1.54-8.28, p 0.003), compared to FET.

CONCLUSION

LBR appears not to be affected by the transfer procedure preferred. Fresh embryo transfer is associated with higher risk of neonatal complications (specifically a higher prevalence of singletons weighting below the 5th percentile and of intrauterine growth retardation) and placenta previa. Reflecting on the increased practice of ART procedures, it is imperative to understand whether a transfer procedure yields less complications than the other and if it is time to switch to a "freeze-all" procedure as standard practice.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinical Trial Registration Number: NCT04310761. Date of registration: March 17, 2020, retrospectively registered.

摘要

目的

评估新鲜和冷冻解冻囊胚移植后活产率(LBR)和母婴/新生儿并发症是否存在差异。

方法

本回顾性观察性研究分析了 2014 年 1 月 1 日至 2018 年 12 月 31 日的 4613 例单胚胎移植(SET)(646 例新鲜和 3967 例冷冻)。新鲜胚胎移植在囊胚期进行,根据患者的年龄和预后进行考虑。在存在卵巢过度刺激综合征、孕酮过早升高、子宫内膜生长不理想或胚胎过多的风险时,建议进行冷冻保存,随后进行冷冻胚胎移植(FET)。

结果

未记录到 LBR 存在差异。新鲜胚胎移植导致新生儿并发症的发生率增加,OR 2.15(95%CI 1.20-3.86,p0.010),5 百分位以下的单胎比例更高(p0.013),且宫内生长受限的比例更高(p0.015),以及母体并发症,胎盘前置的发生率更高,OR 3.58(95%CI 1.54-8.28,p0.003),与 FET 相比。

结论

LBR 似乎不受首选的转移程序影响。新鲜胚胎移植与新生儿并发症风险增加相关(特别是 5 百分位以下的单胎比例更高,宫内生长受限的比例更高),以及胎盘前置。考虑到 ART 程序的广泛应用,了解哪种转移程序比另一种产生的并发症更少,以及是否需要将“全部冷冻”程序作为标准实践进行切换,这一点至关重要。

试验注册

临床试验注册号:NCT04310761。注册日期:2020 年 3 月 17 日,回顾性注册。

相似文献

5
Abnormal implantation after fresh and frozen in vitro fertilization cycles.新鲜及冷冻体外受精周期后的异常着床。
Fertil Steril. 2017 May;107(5):1153-1158. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.03.012. Epub 2017 Apr 19.

本文引用的文献

10
Fetal Medicine Foundation fetal and neonatal population weight charts.胎儿医学基金会胎儿和新生儿人群体重图表。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jul;52(1):44-51. doi: 10.1002/uog.19073. Epub 2018 May 30.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验