• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童和成人后续记忆效应的可靠性:有好的、有坏的、也有充满希望的。

Reliability of subsequent memory effects in children and adults: The good, the bad, and the hopeful.

机构信息

Institute of Gerontology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, United States; Department of Psychology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, United States.

Institute of Gerontology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, United States.

出版信息

Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2021 Dec;52:101037. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2021.101037. Epub 2021 Nov 17.

DOI:10.1016/j.dcn.2021.101037
PMID:34837876
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8626831/
Abstract

Functional MRI (fMRI) is a key tool for investigating neural underpinnings of cognitive development. Yet, in recent years, the reliability of fMRI effects has come into question and with it, the feasibility of using task-based fMRI to identify developmental changes related to cognition. Here, we investigated the reliability of task-based fMRI activations with a widely used subsequent memory paradigm using two developmental samples: a cross-sectional sample (n = 85, age 8-25 years) and a test-retest sample (n = 24, one-month follow up, age 8-20 years). In the large cross-sectional sample, we found good to excellent group-level reliability when assessing activation patterns related to the encoding task and subsequent memory effects. In the test-retest sample, while group-level reliability was excellent, the consistency of activation patterns within individuals was low, particularly for subsequent memory effects. We observed consistent activation patterns in frontal, parietal, and occipital cortices, but comparatively lower test-retest reliability in subcortical regions and the hippocampus. Together, these findings highlight the limitations of interpreting task-based fMRI effects and the importance of incorporating reliability analyses in developmental studies. Leveraging larger and densely collected longitudinal data may help contribute to increased reproducibility and the accumulation of knowledge in developmental sciences.

摘要

功能磁共振成像(fMRI)是研究认知发展神经基础的重要工具。然而,近年来,fMRI 效应的可靠性受到质疑,使用基于任务的 fMRI 来识别与认知相关的发展变化的可行性也受到质疑。在这里,我们使用一种广泛使用的后续记忆范式,通过两个发展性样本(一个横断面样本,n=85,年龄 8-25 岁;一个测试-重测样本,n=24,一个月后随访,年龄 8-20 岁)来研究基于任务的 fMRI 激活的可靠性。在大的横断面样本中,我们发现评估与编码任务和后续记忆效应相关的激活模式时,组水平的可靠性较好到极好。在测试-重测样本中,虽然组水平的可靠性极好,但个体内部的激活模式一致性较低,特别是对于后续记忆效应。我们观察到在额、顶和枕叶皮层中存在一致的激活模式,但在皮质下区域和海马体中的测试-重测可靠性相对较低。总之,这些发现强调了解释基于任务的 fMRI 效应的局限性,以及在发展研究中纳入可靠性分析的重要性。利用更大和更密集收集的纵向数据可能有助于提高发展科学的可重复性和知识积累。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc3b/8626831/c3985e0a4ef0/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc3b/8626831/a5a855c181f0/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc3b/8626831/ecfd8c63180c/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc3b/8626831/c3aea3efd856/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc3b/8626831/e95c84e007a4/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc3b/8626831/c3985e0a4ef0/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc3b/8626831/a5a855c181f0/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc3b/8626831/ecfd8c63180c/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc3b/8626831/c3aea3efd856/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc3b/8626831/e95c84e007a4/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc3b/8626831/c3985e0a4ef0/gr5.jpg

相似文献

1
Reliability of subsequent memory effects in children and adults: The good, the bad, and the hopeful.儿童和成人后续记忆效应的可靠性:有好的、有坏的、也有充满希望的。
Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2021 Dec;52:101037. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2021.101037. Epub 2021 Nov 17.
2
Test-retest reliability of evoked BOLD signals from a cognitive-emotive fMRI test battery.认知情感 fMRI 测试组合诱发的 BOLD 信号的重测信度。
Neuroimage. 2012 Apr 15;60(3):1746-58. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.129. Epub 2012 Feb 8.
3
Test-retest reliability of longitudinal task-based fMRI: Implications for developmental studies.基于任务的功能磁共振成像纵向复测信度:对发育研究的影响。
Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2018 Oct;33:17-26. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2017.07.001. Epub 2017 Jul 13.
4
Test-retest reliability of fMRI verbal episodic memory paradigms in healthy older adults and in persons with mild cognitive impairment.健康老年人和轻度认知障碍患者 fMRI 言语情景记忆范式的重测信度。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2009 Dec;30(12):4033-47. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20827.
5
Reliability measures of functional magnetic resonance imaging in a longitudinal evaluation of mild cognitive impairment.轻度认知障碍纵向评估中功能磁共振成像的可靠性测量
Neuroimage. 2014 Jan 1;84:443-52. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.08.063. Epub 2013 Sep 7.
6
Reliability of functional magnetic resonance imaging associative encoding memory paradigms in non-demented elderly adults.非痴呆老年人群中功能磁共振成像联想编码记忆范式的可靠性。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2011 Dec;32(12):2027-44. doi: 10.1002/hbm.21166. Epub 2011 Jan 21.
7
A precision neuroscience approach to estimating reliability of neural responses during emotion processing: Implications for task-fMRI.一种精确神经科学方法,用于估计情绪处理过程中神经反应的可靠性:对任务 fMRI 的启示。
Neuroimage. 2024 Jan;285:120503. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.120503. Epub 2023 Dec 22.
8
Test-retest reliability of functional MRI food receipt, anticipated receipt, and picture tasks.功能性磁共振成像食物获得、预期获得和图片任务的重测信度。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2021 Aug 2;114(2):764-779. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqab096.
9
Test-retest reliability of memory task functional magnetic resonance imaging in Alzheimer disease clinical trials.阿尔茨海默病临床试验中记忆任务功能磁共振成像的重测信度
Arch Neurol. 2011 May;68(5):599-606. doi: 10.1001/archneurol.2011.94.
10
Reliability of variability and complexity measures for task and task-free BOLD fMRI.任务态和静息态 fMRI 的变异性和复杂性测量的可靠性。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2024 Jul 15;45(10):e26778. doi: 10.1002/hbm.26778.

引用本文的文献

1
Reinstatement and transformation of memory traces for recognition.用于识别的记忆痕迹的恢复与转化。
Sci Adv. 2025 Feb 21;11(8):eadp9336. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adp9336. Epub 2025 Feb 19.
2
Impacts of early life adversity on the neurocircuitry of emotional memory in children.早期生活逆境对儿童情绪记忆神经回路的影响。
Dev Psychopathol. 2024 Oct 29:1-12. doi: 10.1017/S0954579424001718.
3
From vision to memory: How scene-sensitive regions support episodic memory formation during child development.从视觉到记忆:场景敏感区域如何在儿童发育过程中支持情景记忆形成。

本文引用的文献

1
Neural Correlates of Successful Memory Encoding in Kindergarten and Early Elementary School Children: Longitudinal Trends and Effects of Schooling.幼儿园和小学早期儿童成功记忆编码的神经相关因素:纵向趋势和学校教育的影响。
Cereb Cortex. 2021 Jul 5;31(8):3764-3779. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhab046.
2
A Functional MRI Paradigm for Efficient Mapping of Memory Encoding Across Sensory Conditions.一种用于跨感觉条件高效映射记忆编码的功能磁共振成像范式。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2021 Jan 21;14:591721. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.591721. eCollection 2020.
3
Differential Functional Connectivity in Anterior and Posterior Hippocampus Supporting the Development of Memory Formation.
Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2024 Feb;65:101340. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2024.101340. Epub 2024 Jan 5.
4
From Classical Methods to Generative Models: Tackling the Unreliability of Neuroscientific Measures in Mental Health Research.从经典方法到生成模型:解决心理健康研究中神经科学测量的不可靠性。
Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2023 Aug;8(8):822-831. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2023.01.001. Epub 2023 Jan 11.
5
Dissociable oscillatory theta signatures of memory formation in the developing brain.发育中大脑记忆形成的分离振荡θ特征。
Curr Biol. 2022 Apr 11;32(7):1457-1469.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2022.01.053. Epub 2022 Feb 15.
支持记忆形成发展的前海马体和后海马体中的差异性功能连接。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2020 Jun 5;14:204. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00204. eCollection 2020.
4
What Is the Test-Retest Reliability of Common Task-Functional MRI Measures? New Empirical Evidence and a Meta-Analysis.常见任务态功能磁共振测量的重测信度如何?新的实证证据和荟萃分析。
Psychol Sci. 2020 Jul;31(7):792-806. doi: 10.1177/0956797620916786. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
5
Individual Variation in Functional Topography of Association Networks in Youth.青少年大脑关联网络功能拓扑的个体差异。
Neuron. 2020 Apr 22;106(2):340-353.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2020.01.029. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
6
The empirical replicability of task-based fMRI as a function of sample size.基于任务的 fMRI 的实证可重复性与样本量的函数关系。
Neuroimage. 2020 May 15;212:116601. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116601. Epub 2020 Feb 7.
7
Addressing the reliability fallacy in fMRI: Similar group effects may arise from unreliable individual effects.解决 fMRI 中的可靠性谬论:相似的群组效应可能源于不可靠的个体效应。
Neuroimage. 2019 Jul 15;195:174-189. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.03.053. Epub 2019 Mar 28.
8
Small sample sizes reduce the replicability of task-based fMRI studies.小样本量降低了基于任务的功能磁共振成像研究的可重复性。
Commun Biol. 2018 Jun 7;1:62. doi: 10.1038/s42003-018-0073-z. eCollection 2018.
9
Robust is not necessarily reliable: From within-subjects fMRI contrasts to between-subjects comparisons.稳健性不一定可靠:从基于个体的 fMRI 对比到基于个体间的比较。
Neuroimage. 2018 Jun;173:146-152. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.02.024. Epub 2018 Feb 16.
10
Test-retest reliability of longitudinal task-based fMRI: Implications for developmental studies.基于任务的功能磁共振成像纵向复测信度:对发育研究的影响。
Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2018 Oct;33:17-26. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2017.07.001. Epub 2017 Jul 13.