Department of Clinical Psychological Science, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, The Netherlands.
Department of Neuropsychology & Psychopharmacology, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, The Netherlands.
Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2022 Feb;136:105596. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2021.105596. Epub 2021 Nov 17.
Acute stress is associated with a shift from goal-directed to habitual behavior. This stress-induced preference for habitual behavior has been suggested as a potential mechanism by which binge eating disorder (BED) patients succumb to eating large amounts of high-caloric foods in an uncontrolled manner (i.e., binge episodes). While in healthy subjects the balance between goal-directed and habitual behavior is subserved by the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), insular cortex, orbitofrontal cortex (OFC), anterior caudate nucleus, and posterior putamen, the brain mechanism that underlies this (possibly amplified) stress-induced behavioral shift in BED patients is currently unknown. In the current study, 76 participants (38 BED, 38 healthy controls (HCs)) learned six stimulus-response-outcome associations in a well-established instrumental learning task. Subsequently, three outcomes were selectively devalued, after which participants underwent either a stress induction procedure (Maastricht Acute Stress Test; MAST) or a no-stress control procedure. Next, the balance between goal-directed and habitual behavior was assessed during functional magnetic resonance imaging. Findings show that the balance between goal-directed and habitual behavior was associated with activity in the ACC, insula, and OFC in no-stress HCs. Although stress and BED did not modulate the balance between goal-directed and habitual behavior, BED participants displayed a smaller difference in putamen activation between trials probing goal-directed and habitual behavior compared with HCs when using a ROI approach. We conclude that putamen activity differences between BED and HC could reflect changes in monitoring of response accuracy or reward value, albeit perhaps not sufficiently to induce a measurable shift from goal-directed to habitual behavior. Future research could clarify potential boundary conditions of stress-induced shifts in instrumental behavior in BED patients.
急性应激与从目标导向行为向习惯行为的转变有关。这种应激诱导的习惯行为偏好被认为是暴食障碍(BED)患者以不受控制的方式(即暴食发作)大量食用高热量食物的潜在机制。虽然在健康受试者中,目标导向和习惯行为之间的平衡由前扣带皮层(ACC)、岛叶皮层、眶额皮层(OFC)、前尾状核和后苍白球维持,但目前尚不清楚 BED 患者这种(可能放大的)应激诱导行为转变的大脑机制。在当前的研究中,76 名参与者(38 名 BED,38 名健康对照组(HCs))在一项成熟的工具学习任务中学习了六个刺激-反应-结果关联。随后,有三个结果被选择性地贬值,之后参与者接受了应激诱导程序(马斯特里赫特急性应激测试;MAST)或无应激对照程序。接下来,在功能磁共振成像期间评估了目标导向和习惯行为之间的平衡。研究结果表明,在无应激的 HCs 中,目标导向和习惯行为之间的平衡与 ACC、岛叶和 OFC 的活动有关。尽管应激和 BED 没有调节目标导向和习惯行为之间的平衡,但与 HCs 相比,BED 参与者在使用 ROI 方法探测目标导向和习惯行为的试验之间,纹状体的激活差异较小。我们得出结论,BED 和 HC 之间纹状体活动的差异可能反映了对反应准确性或奖励价值的监测变化,尽管可能不足以诱导从目标导向行为到习惯行为的可测量转变。未来的研究可以阐明 BED 患者工具行为中应激诱导转变的潜在边界条件。