Social, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2023 May;31(3):363-376. doi: 10.1002/erv.2967. Epub 2023 Jan 13.
Functional neuroimaging studies have found differential neural activation patterns during anticipation-related paradigms in participants with eating disorders (EDs) compared to controls. However, publications reported conflicting results on the directionality and location of the abnormal activations. There is an urgent need to integrate our existing knowledge of anticipation, both rewarding and aversive, to elucidate these differences.
We conducted an activation likelihood estimation (ALE) meta-analysis to quantitatively review functional neuroimaging studies that evaluated differences between brain correlates of anticipation in participants with and without disordered eating. PubMed, Web of Sciences, PsycINFO, Medline and EMBASE were searched for studies published up to November 2022. Exploratory sub-analyses to check for differences between reward and non-reward anticipation among all anticipation paradigms.
Twenty-one references met the inclusion criteria for meta-analysis. The meta-analysis across anticipation all tasks identified a significant hyperactivation cluster in the right putamen in participants with disordered eating (n = 17 experiments) and a significant hypoactivation cluster in the left inferior parietal lobule (n = 13 experiments), in participants with disordered eating compared to controls.
These findings and sub-analyses of reward- and non-reward-related cues suggest potential pathophysiological mechanisms underlying anticipatory responses to rewarding and aversive cues in ED.
功能性神经影像学研究发现,与对照组相比,饮食失调(ED)患者在与预期相关的范式中表现出不同的神经激活模式。然而,发表的研究报告在异常激活的方向和位置上存在相互矛盾的结果。迫切需要整合我们现有的关于预期的知识,包括奖励和厌恶,以阐明这些差异。
我们进行了激活似然估计(ALE)荟萃分析,以定量回顾评估有和无饮食失调患者在预期大脑相关性方面差异的功能神经影像学研究。在截至 2022 年 11 月的情况下,我们在 PubMed、Web of Sciences、PsycINFO、Medline 和 EMBASE 上搜索了研究文献。进行了探索性亚分析,以检查所有预期范式中奖励和非奖励预期之间的差异。
21 篇参考文献符合荟萃分析的纳入标准。跨所有预期任务的荟萃分析确定了在饮食失调患者(n=17 项实验)中右侧壳核存在显著的过度激活簇,以及在饮食失调患者(n=13 项实验)中左侧顶下小叶存在显著的激活不足簇,与对照组相比。
这些发现以及对奖励和非奖励相关线索的亚分析表明,ED 对奖励和厌恶线索的预期反应的潜在病理生理机制。