Peng Mei-Tzi
MSN, RN, Section Chief, Publishing Division, Taiwan Nurses Association, Taiwan, ROC.
Hu Li Za Zhi. 2021 Dec;68(6):91-98. doi: 10.6224/JN.202112_68(6).12.
The advance of information technology has led to the significant diversification of scholarly publishing. Over the past decade, the popularity of open access in scholarly publishing has led to an unintended rise in the number of predatory journals and the growth in predatory open access (POA) publishing practices. The main goal of POA publishing is to profit from article processing charges, and thus little or no attention is given to proper peer review or to editorial / publishing standards. Most articles published in predatory journals are tainted by examples of academic ethics violations such as falsification, deception, and fraud. Moreover, the risk of citation contamination is high, as articles published in POA publications may be cited and referenced in the legitimate scientific literature, with consequences including confounding subsequent research, negatively influencing public policies, and hindering social progress and public health. However, most nurses in Taiwan remain unfamiliar with this issue. This article provides a brief review of the open access movement and insights regarding how to assess the credentials of journals and publishers before submitting manuscripts to avoid predatory journals, promote academic integrity, and contribute to the sustainable development of the nursing profession.
信息技术的进步导致学术出版出现了显著的多样化。在过去十年中,学术出版领域开放获取的普及导致掠夺性期刊数量意外增加,掠夺性开放获取(POA)出版行为也不断增多。POA出版的主要目标是从文章处理费中获利,因此很少或根本不关注适当的同行评审或编辑/出版标准。在掠夺性期刊上发表的大多数文章都存在学术道德违规行为,如伪造、欺骗和欺诈等问题。此外,被引用污染的风险很高,因为在POA出版物上发表的文章可能会在合法的科学文献中被引用和参考,其后果包括混淆后续研究、对公共政策产生负面影响以及阻碍社会进步和公共卫生。然而,台湾的大多数护士对这个问题仍然不熟悉。本文简要回顾了开放获取运动,并就如何在提交稿件之前评估期刊和出版商的资质提供见解,以避免陷入掠夺性期刊,促进学术诚信,并为护理专业的可持续发展做出贡献。