• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“脊柱减负”椅设计对坐姿高度和姿势的影响。

Effect of a 'spine offloading' chair design on seated height and posture.

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Canada.

School of Human Kinetics and Recreation, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Canada.

出版信息

Ergonomics. 2022 Jul;65(7):976-986. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2021.2007290. Epub 2022 Jan 25.

DOI:10.1080/00140139.2021.2007290
PMID:34839811
Abstract

A prototype chair with anterior chest and arm supports has been designed to reduce compressive spine loads. The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of this offloading design on seated height compared to a control configuration of the same chair. 20 males sat on each configuration for 1 hour. Seated height, perceived pain, spine angles, seat pressure, and participant experience were measured. Spine height loss was significantly reduced in the offloading (-0.75 ± 3.79 mm) compared to the control configuration (-6.16 ± 4.27 mm,  < 0.001), and participants sat significantly more anterior on the seat pan in the offloading (20.56 ± 1.67 cm) compared to control configuration (18.03 ± 1.92 cm,  < 0.001). There were no differences in spine angles or perceived back and gluteal pain between configurations. This design appears to be a promising approach to protecting the back during sitting when engaging in forward leaning tasks where the offloading effect of a backrest may be minimised. A prototype chair with anterior chest and arm supports designed to offload the spine was shown to significantly reduce seated height loss during 1-hour of sitting compared to a control configuration. While participants perceived the offloading design to be more supportive, no differences in perceived pain or posture were found.

摘要

一种带有前胸部和手臂支撑的原型椅已被设计用于减轻脊柱压缩负荷。本研究的目的是比较这种减压设计与同椅的对照结构在坐姿高度上的影响。20 名男性分别坐在每种配置上 1 小时。测量坐姿高度、感知疼痛、脊柱角度、座椅压力和参与者体验。与对照结构(-6.16±4.27mm,  < 0.001)相比,减压结构(-0.75±3.79mm)的脊柱高度损失显著降低,并且参与者在减压结构中坐在座椅前缘的位置明显更深(20.56±1.67cm)与对照结构(18.03±1.92cm,  < 0.001)。两种配置之间的脊柱角度或背部和臀部疼痛感知没有差异。当进行前倾任务时,这种设计似乎是一种很有前途的保护背部的方法,因为靠背的减压效果可能会降低。一种带有前胸部和手臂支撑的原型椅,旨在减轻脊柱的负荷,与对照结构相比,在 1 小时的坐姿中,显著降低了坐姿高度的损失。虽然参与者认为减压设计更具支撑力,但在感知疼痛或姿势方面没有发现差异。

相似文献

1
Effect of a 'spine offloading' chair design on seated height and posture.“脊柱减负”椅设计对坐姿高度和姿势的影响。
Ergonomics. 2022 Jul;65(7):976-986. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2021.2007290. Epub 2022 Jan 25.
2
The impact of office chair features on lumbar lordosis, intervertebral joint and sacral tilt angles: a radiographic assessment.办公椅特性对腰椎前凸、椎间关节及骶骨倾斜角度的影响:一项影像学评估
Ergonomics. 2017 Oct;60(10):1393-1404. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2016.1265670. Epub 2016 Dec 23.
3
Lumbar spine curvature during office chair sitting.在办公椅上就坐时的腰椎曲度。
Med Eng Phys. 2000 Nov;22(9):665-9. doi: 10.1016/s1350-4533(00)00086-2.
4
Sitting biomechanics part I: review of the literature.坐姿生物力学 第一部分:文献综述
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1999 Nov-Dec;22(9):594-609. doi: 10.1016/s0161-4754(99)70020-5.
5
Effect of a dynamic seat pan design on spine biomechanics, calf circumference and perceived pain during prolonged sitting.动态座板设计对长时间坐姿下脊柱生物力学、小腿围度和感知疼痛的影响。
Appl Ergon. 2021 Nov;97:103546. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103546. Epub 2021 Aug 14.
6
Specific flexion-related low back pain and sitting: comparison of seated discomfort on two different chairs.特定与弯曲相关的下背痛和坐姿:两种不同椅子的坐姿不适比较。
Ergonomics. 2013;56(4):650-8. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2012.762462. Epub 2013 Feb 26.
7
The effects of the seat cushion contour and the sitting posture on surface pressure distribution and comfort during seated work.座椅垫轮廓和坐姿对坐姿工作时表面压力分布和舒适度的影响。
Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2020 Sep 17;33(5):675-689. doi: 10.13075/ijomeh.1896.01582. Epub 2020 Jul 27.
8
Effect of office chair design features on lumbar spine posture, muscle activity and perceived pain during prolonged sitting.办公椅设计特点对长时间坐姿下腰椎姿势、肌肉活动和感知疼痛的影响。
Ergonomics. 2023 Oct;66(10):1465-1476. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2022.2152113. Epub 2022 Dec 8.
9
Biomechanical investigation of prolonged driving in an ergonomically designed truck seat prototype.人体工程学设计卡车座椅原型的长时间驾驶的生物力学研究。
Ergonomics. 2018 Mar;61(3):367-380. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2017.1355070. Epub 2017 Aug 16.
10
Sitting with adjustable ischial and back supports: biomechanical changes.带有可调节坐骨和背部支撑的座椅:生物力学变化
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Jun 1;28(11):1113-21; discussion 1121-2. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000068243.63203.A8.