Suppr超能文献

OLA 策略治疗 ARDS:其对死亡率的影响取决于实现的复张(PaO/FiO)和机械功率。系统评价和荟萃分析,包括荟萃回归。

OLA strategy for ARDS: Its effect on mortality depends on achieved recruitment (PaO/FiO) and mechanical power. Systematic review and meta-analysis with meta-regression.

机构信息

PICU, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, València, Spain.

PICU, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain.

出版信息

Med Intensiva (Engl Ed). 2021 Dec;45(9):516-531. doi: 10.1016/j.medine.2021.03.001.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The "Open Lung Approach" (OLA), that includes high levels of positive end-expiratory pressure coupled with limited tidal volumes, is considered optimal for adult patients with ARDS. However, many previous meta-analyses have shown only marginal benefits of OLA on mortality but with statistical heterogeneity. It is crucial to identify the most likely moderators of this effect. To determine the effect of OLA strategy on mortality of ventilated ARDS patients. We hypothesized that the degree of recruitment achieved in the control group (PaO/FiO ratio on day 3 of ventilation), and the difference in Mechanical Power (MP) or Driving Pressure (DP) between experimental and control groups will be the most likely sources of heterogeneity.

DESIGN

A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis was performed according to PRISMA statement and registered in PROSPERO database. We searched only for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). GRADE guidelines were used for rating the quality of evidence. Publication bias was assessed. For the Meta-analysis, we used a Random Effects Model. Sources of heterogeneity were explored with Meta-Regression, using a priori proposed set of possible moderators. For model comparison, Akaike's Information Criterion with the finite sample correction (AICc) was used.

SETTING

Not applicable.

PATIENTS

Fourteen RCTs were included in the study.

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable.

MAIN VARIABLES OF INTEREST

Not applicable.

RESULTS

Evidence of publication bias was detected, and quality of evidence was downgraded. Pooled analysis did not show a significant difference in the 28-day mortality between OLA strategy and control groups. Overall risk of bias was low. The analysis detected statistical heterogeneity. The two "best" explicative meta-regression models were those that used control PaO/FiO on day 3 and difference in MP between experimental and control groups. The DP and MP models were highly correlated.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no clear benefit of OLA strategy on mortality of ARDS patients, with significant heterogeneity among RCTs. Mortality effect of OLA is mediated by lung recruitment and mechanical power.

摘要

目的

“开放肺策略”(OLA),包括高水平的呼气末正压和限制潮气量,被认为是成人 ARDS 患者的最佳治疗方法。然而,许多先前的荟萃分析表明,OLA 对死亡率的影响仅略有改善,但存在统计学异质性。确定这种影响的最可能调节因素至关重要。本研究旨在确定 OLA 策略对 ARDS 患者死亡率的影响。我们假设,对照组在通气第 3 天的氧合指数(PaO/FiO 比值)和实验组与对照组之间的机械功率(MP)或驱动压力(DP)差异是异质性的最可能来源。

设计

根据 PRISMA 声明进行系统评价和荟萃分析,并在 PROSPERO 数据库中进行注册。我们仅搜索了随机对照试验(RCTs)。使用 GRADE 指南对证据质量进行评级。评估了发表偏倚。对于荟萃分析,我们使用了随机效应模型。使用预先提出的一系列可能的调节因素,通过元回归探索异质性来源。为了进行模型比较,使用了带有有限样本校正的 Akaike 信息准则(AICc)。

设置

不适用。

患者

本研究纳入了 14 项 RCT。

干预措施

不适用。

主要观察变量

不适用。

结果

检测到发表偏倚的证据,证据质量被降级。汇总分析显示,OLA 策略与对照组在 28 天死亡率方面无显著差异。整体偏倚风险较低。分析检测到统计学异质性。使用对照组第 3 天的 PaO/FiO 比值和实验组与对照组之间的 MP 差异的两个“最佳”解释性元回归模型是那些具有统计学意义的模型。DP 和 MP 模型高度相关。

结论

OLA 策略对 ARDS 患者的死亡率没有明显益处,RCT 之间存在显著的异质性。OLA 的死亡率效应是通过肺复张和机械功率介导的。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验