• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

强制佩戴口罩前后的口罩使用和保持社交距离:在公共等候队伍中不存在风险补偿的证据。

Face mask use and physical distancing before and after mandatory masking: No evidence on risk compensation in public waiting lines.

作者信息

Seres Gyula, Balleyer Anna, Cerutti Nicola, Friedrichsen Jana, Süer Müge

机构信息

Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany.

University of Groningen, Netherlands.

出版信息

J Econ Behav Organ. 2021 Dec;192:765-781. doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2021.10.032. Epub 2021 Nov 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.jebo.2021.10.032
PMID:34840368
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8604556/
Abstract

During the COVID-19 pandemic, the introduction of mandatory face mask usage triggered a heated debate. A major point of controversy is whether community use of masks creates a false sense of security that would diminish physical distancing, counteracting any potential direct benefit from masking. We conducted a randomized field experiment in Berlin, Germany, to investigate how masks affect distancing and whether the mask effect interacts with the introduction of an indoor mask mandate. Joining waiting lines in front of stores, we measured distances kept from the experimenter in two treatment conditions - the experimenter wore a mask in one and no face covering in the other - in two time spans - before and after mask use becoming mandatory in stores. We find no evidence that mandatory masking has a negative effect on distance kept toward a masked person. To the contrary, masks significantly increase distancing and the effect does not differ between the two periods. However, we show that after the mandate distances are shorter in locations where more non-essential stores, which were closed before the mandate, had reopened. We argue that the relaxations in general restrictions that coincided with the mask mandate led individuals to reduce other precautions, like keeping a safe distance.

摘要

在新冠疫情期间,强制佩戴口罩的规定引发了激烈的争论。一个主要的争议点在于,在社区中佩戴口罩是否会营造一种虚假的安全感,从而削弱保持社交距离的意识,抵消佩戴口罩可能带来的直接益处。我们在德国柏林进行了一项随机实地实验,以研究口罩如何影响社交距离,以及口罩的作用是否会与室内口罩强制令的实施产生相互作用。我们在商店前排队时,在两种处理条件下测量了与实验者保持的距离:一种条件下实验者佩戴口罩,另一种条件下实验者不戴面罩;同时设置了两个时间段——商店强制要求佩戴口罩之前和之后。我们没有发现证据表明强制佩戴口罩会对与佩戴口罩的人保持的距离产生负面影响。相反,口罩显著增加了社交距离,而且在两个时间段内这种效果并无差异。然而,我们发现,在强制令实施后,那些在强制令实施前关闭的更多非必需商店重新开业的地方,人们保持的距离更短。我们认为,与口罩强制令同时出现的总体限制的放松,导致人们减少了其他预防措施,比如保持安全距离。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d2bb/8604556/48fac478772e/gr3_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d2bb/8604556/661cf4d037e3/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d2bb/8604556/7310eb0d0349/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d2bb/8604556/48fac478772e/gr3_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d2bb/8604556/661cf4d037e3/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d2bb/8604556/7310eb0d0349/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d2bb/8604556/48fac478772e/gr3_lrg.jpg

相似文献

1
Face mask use and physical distancing before and after mandatory masking: No evidence on risk compensation in public waiting lines.强制佩戴口罩前后的口罩使用和保持社交距离:在公共等候队伍中不存在风险补偿的证据。
J Econ Behav Organ. 2021 Dec;192:765-781. doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2021.10.032. Epub 2021 Nov 20.
2
No evidence that mask-wearing in public places elicits risk compensation behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic.没有证据表明在 COVID-19 大流行期间,人们在公共场所戴口罩会引发风险补偿行为。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jan 27;12(1):1511. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-05270-3.
3
The Impact of Mask Mandates on Face Mask Use During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Longitudinal Survey Study.口罩令对 COVID-19 大流行期间口罩使用的影响:纵向调查研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2023 Jan 11;9:e42616. doi: 10.2196/42616.
4
Does face mask use elicit risk-compensation? Quasi-experimental evidence from Denmark during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.口罩使用是否会引发风险补偿?来自 SARS-CoV-2 大流行期间丹麦的准实验证据。
Eur J Public Health. 2021 Dec 1;31(6):1259-1265. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckab136.
5
Association of masking policies with mask adherence and distancing during the SARS-COV-2 pandemic.SARS-COV-2 大流行期间掩蔽政策与口罩佩戴和保持距离的关联。
Am J Infect Control. 2022 Sep;50(9):969-974. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2022.04.010. Epub 2022 May 8.
6
Face mask mandates and risk compensation: an analysis of mobility data during the COVID-19 pandemic in Bangladesh.口罩令与风险补偿:孟加拉国 COVID-19 大流行期间的流动性数据分析。
BMJ Glob Health. 2022 Jan;7(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-006803.
7
Face Mask Use Conditionally Decreases Compliance With Physical Distancing Rules Against COVID-19: Gender Differences in Risk Compensation Pattern.戴口罩会使人们有条件地降低对 COVID-19 的遵守程度:风险补偿模式中的性别差异。
Ann Behav Med. 2022 Apr 2;56(4):332-346. doi: 10.1093/abm/kaab072.
8
Risk compensation during COVID-19: The impact of face mask usage on social distancing.新冠疫情期间的风险补偿:口罩使用对面部距离的影响。
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2021 Dec;27(4):722-738. doi: 10.1037/xap0000382.
9
COVID-19 Mask Usage and Social Distancing in Social Media Images: Large-scale Deep Learning Analysis.社交媒体图像中的 COVID-19 口罩使用和社交距离:大规模深度学习分析。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2022 Jan 18;8(1):e26868. doi: 10.2196/26868.
10
What is suitable social distancing for people wearing face masks during the COVID-19 pandemic?在 COVID-19 大流行期间,戴口罩的人应该保持多远的社交距离?
Indoor Air. 2022 Jan;32(1):e12935. doi: 10.1111/ina.12935. Epub 2021 Oct 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Outdoor social distancing behaviors changed during a pandemic: A longitudinal analysis using street view imagery.大流行期间户外社交距离行为的变化:一项使用街景图像的纵向分析。
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 5;19(12):e0315132. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315132. eCollection 2024.
2
Effect of face-covering use on adherence to other COVID-19 protective behaviours: A systematic review.戴口罩对面部对遵守其他 COVID-19 防护措施的影响:系统评价。
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 11;19(4):e0284629. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284629. eCollection 2024.
3
Perception of interpersonal distance and social distancing before and during COVID-19 pandemic.

本文引用的文献

1
Heterogeneity in Risk-Taking During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Evidence From the UK Lockdown.新冠疫情期间冒险行为的异质性:来自英国封锁措施的证据
Front Psychol. 2021 Apr 1;12:643653. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.643653. eCollection 2021.
2
Importance of non-pharmaceutical interventions in lowering the viral inoculum to reduce susceptibility to infection by SARS-CoV-2 and potentially disease severity.非药物干预措施在降低病毒接种量以减少感染 SARS-CoV-2 的易感性及潜在疾病严重程度方面的重要性。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Sep;21(9):e296-e301. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30982-8. Epub 2021 Feb 22.
3
Downsides of face masks and possible mitigation strategies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
新冠肺炎疫情前后人际距离和社交距离的感知。
Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 25;14(1):4568. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-55218-y.
4
The COVID-19 pandemic and changes in social behavior: Protective face masks reduce deliberate social distancing preferences while leaving automatic avoidance behavior unaffected.**译文**:新冠疫情与社会行为变化:防护口罩减少了人们故意保持社交距离的意愿,但对自动回避行为没有影响。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2024 Jan 8;9(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s41235-023-00528-4.
5
People interact closer when a face mask is worn but risk compensation is at best partial.人们戴口罩时会更近距离地互动,但风险补偿最多只是部分的。
Eur J Public Health. 2023 Dec 9;33(6):1177-1182. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckad161.
6
Refraining from interaction can decrease fear of physical closeness during COVID-19.在 COVID-19 期间,避免互动可以减少对身体亲近的恐惧。
Sci Rep. 2023 May 11;13(1):7700. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-34667-x.
7
Is self-reported depression, HIV status, COVID-19 health risk profile and SARS-CoV-2 exposure associated with difficulty in adhering to COVID-19 prevention measures among residents in West Africa?自我报告的抑郁、HIV 状况、COVID-19 健康风险特征和 SARS-CoV-2 暴露是否与西非居民遵守 COVID-19 预防措施的困难有关?
BMC Public Health. 2022 Nov 10;22(1):2057. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14429-6.
8
A multi-layered strategy for COVID-19 infection prophylaxis in schools: A review of the evidence for masks, distancing, and ventilation.多层级策略预防学校内 COVID-19 感染:口罩、保持距离和通风措施的证据综述。
Indoor Air. 2022 Oct;32(10):e13142. doi: 10.1111/ina.13142.
9
During the COVID-19 pandemic participants prefer settings with a face mask, no interaction and at a closer distance.在 COVID-19 大流行期间,参与者更喜欢戴口罩、不互动和保持近距离的环境。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jul 27;12(1):12777. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-16730-1.
10
Face masks reduce interpersonal distance in virtual reality.口罩减少虚拟现实中的人际距离。
Sci Rep. 2022 Feb 9;12(1):2213. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-06086-x.
口罩的缺点及可能的缓解策略:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2021 Feb 22;11(2):e044364. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044364.
4
Hydrating the respiratory tract: An alternative explanation why masks lower severity of COVID-19.给呼吸道补水:口罩降低 COVID-19 严重程度的另一种解释。
Biophys J. 2021 Mar 16;120(6):994-1000. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2021.02.002. Epub 2021 Feb 12.
5
Transmission of COVID-19 in 282 clusters in Catalonia, Spain: a cohort study.西班牙加泰罗尼亚 282 起聚集性 COVID-19 传播:一项队列研究。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 May;21(5):629-636. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30985-3. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
6
An evidence review of face masks against COVID-19.针对 COVID-19 的口罩有效性评估综述
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Jan 26;118(4). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2014564118.
7
COVID-19: Does the infectious inoculum dose-response relationship contribute to understanding heterogeneity in disease severity and transmission dynamics?新型冠状病毒肺炎:传染性接种剂量反应关系有助于理解疾病严重程度和传播动力学的异质性吗?
Med Hypotheses. 2021 Jan;146:110431. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2020.110431. Epub 2020 Nov 25.
8
Face masks considerably reduce COVID-19 cases in Germany.口罩大大减少了德国的 COVID-19 病例。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Dec 22;117(51):32293-32301. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2015954117. Epub 2020 Dec 3.
9
Age-specific mortality and immunity patterns of SARS-CoV-2.SARS-CoV-2 的年龄特异性死亡率和免疫模式。
Nature. 2021 Feb;590(7844):140-145. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2918-0. Epub 2020 Nov 2.
10
Indoor transmission of SARS-CoV-2.室内传播的 SARS-CoV-2。
Indoor Air. 2021 May;31(3):639-645. doi: 10.1111/ina.12766. Epub 2020 Nov 20.