• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在 COVID-19 大流行期间,参与者更喜欢戴口罩、不互动和保持近距离的环境。

During the COVID-19 pandemic participants prefer settings with a face mask, no interaction and at a closer distance.

机构信息

Cognitive Sciences Division, University of Potsdam, Karl‑Liebknecht‑Straße 24‑25, House 14, 14476, Potsdam, Germany.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2022 Jul 27;12(1):12777. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-16730-1.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-022-16730-1
PMID:35896701
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9326138/
Abstract

Peripersonal space is the space surrounding our body, where multisensory integration of stimuli and action execution take place. The size of peripersonal space is flexible and subject to change by various personal and situational factors. The dynamic representation of our peripersonal space modulates our spatial behaviors towards other individuals. During the COVID-19 pandemic, this spatial behavior was modified by two further factors: social distancing and wearing a face mask. Evidence from offline and online studies on the impact of a face mask on pro-social behavior is mixed. In an attempt to clarify the role of face masks as pro-social or anti-social signals, 235 observers participated in the present online study. They watched pictures of two models standing at three different distances from each other (50, 90 and 150 cm), who were either wearing a face mask or not and were either interacting by initiating a hand shake or just standing still. The observers' task was to classify the model by gender. Our results show that observers react fastest, and therefore show least avoidance, for the shortest distances (50 and 90 cm) but only when models wear a face mask and do not interact. Thus, our results document both pro- and anti-social consequences of face masks as a result of the complex interplay between social distancing and interactive behavior. Practical implications of these findings are discussed.

摘要

个体空间是环绕我们身体的空间,在这里,刺激和动作执行的多感觉整合发生。个体空间的大小是灵活的,并受到各种个人和情境因素的影响而发生变化。我们个体空间的动态表示调节了我们对其他个体的空间行为。在 COVID-19 大流行期间,这种空间行为受到另外两个因素的影响:社交距离和戴口罩。关于口罩对亲社会行为影响的离线和在线研究的证据相互矛盾。为了阐明口罩作为亲社会或反社会信号的作用,235 名观察者参与了本项在线研究。他们观看了两个模特站在彼此三个不同距离(50、90 和 150 厘米)的图片,模特们要么戴着口罩,要么不戴口罩,要么通过握手来互动,要么只是站着不动。观察者的任务是通过性别对模特进行分类。我们的结果表明,观察者对最短距离(50 和 90 厘米)的反应最快,因此回避程度最低,但只有当模特戴口罩且不互动时才会如此。因此,我们的结果记录了口罩作为社交距离和互动行为复杂相互作用的结果所产生的亲社会和反社会的后果。讨论了这些发现的实际意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dab8/9329302/138068a688ba/41598_2022_16730_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dab8/9329302/65ff767b66ad/41598_2022_16730_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dab8/9329302/138068a688ba/41598_2022_16730_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dab8/9329302/65ff767b66ad/41598_2022_16730_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dab8/9329302/138068a688ba/41598_2022_16730_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
During the COVID-19 pandemic participants prefer settings with a face mask, no interaction and at a closer distance.在 COVID-19 大流行期间,参与者更喜欢戴口罩、不互动和保持近距离的环境。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jul 27;12(1):12777. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-16730-1.
2
Refraining from interaction can decrease fear of physical closeness during COVID-19.在 COVID-19 期间,避免互动可以减少对身体亲近的恐惧。
Sci Rep. 2023 May 11;13(1):7700. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-34667-x.
3
What is suitable social distancing for people wearing face masks during the COVID-19 pandemic?在 COVID-19 大流行期间,戴口罩的人应该保持多远的社交距离?
Indoor Air. 2022 Jan;32(1):e12935. doi: 10.1111/ina.12935. Epub 2021 Oct 4.
4
Examining the interplay between face mask usage, asymptomatic transmission, and social distancing on the spread of COVID-19.探讨口罩使用、无症状传播和社交距离在 COVID-19 传播中的相互作用。
Sci Rep. 2021 Aug 6;11(1):15998. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-94960-5.
5
Association of COVID-19 Misinformation with Face Mask Wearing and Social Distancing in a Nationally Representative US Sample.在一项具有全国代表性的美国样本中,与新冠病毒错误信息相关的口罩佩戴和社交距离行为。
Health Commun. 2021 Jan;36(1):6-14. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2020.1847437. Epub 2020 Nov 22.
6
Face Masks During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Simple Protection Tool With Many Meanings.口罩在 COVID-19 大流行期间:一个具有多重意义的简单防护工具。
Front Public Health. 2021 Jan 13;8:606635. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.606635. eCollection 2020.
7
No evidence that mask-wearing in public places elicits risk compensation behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic.没有证据表明在 COVID-19 大流行期间,人们在公共场所戴口罩会引发风险补偿行为。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jan 27;12(1):1511. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-05270-3.
8
Negative attitudes about facemasks during the COVID-19 pandemic: The dual importance of perceived ineffectiveness and psychological reactance.新冠疫情期间对口罩的负面态度:感知无效性和心理抗拒的双重重要性。
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 17;16(2):e0246317. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246317. eCollection 2021.
9
Understanding Physical Distancing and Face Mask Use Across High-Risk African American Subgroups During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Application of Health Belief Model.理解新冠疫情期间高风险非裔美国人亚群中的身体疏远和戴口罩行为:健康信念模型的应用。
Health Promot Pract. 2024 Jan;25(1):49-59. doi: 10.1177/15248399221151176. Epub 2023 Jan 29.
10
How different face mask types affect interpersonal distance perception and threat feeling in social interaction.不同类型的口罩对面部距离感知和社交互动中威胁感的影响。
Cogn Process. 2024 Aug;25(3):477-490. doi: 10.1007/s10339-024-01179-z. Epub 2024 Mar 16.

引用本文的文献

1
From Mandate to Choice: How Voluntary Mask Wearing Shapes Interpersonal Distance Among University Students After COVID-19.从强制到选择:新冠疫情后大学生自愿佩戴口罩如何塑造人际距离
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Aug 9;13(16):1956. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13161956.
2
Impact of face masks and sunglasses on attractiveness, trustworthiness, and familiarity, and limited time effect: a Japanese sample.口罩和太阳镜对吸引力、可信度和熟悉度的影响以及限时效应:日本样本
Discov Psychol. 2023;3(1):5. doi: 10.1007/s44202-023-00066-6. Epub 2023 Jan 24.
3
A quantitative study on peripersonal space in anorexia nervosa and healthy subjects: Role of social variables and association with psychopathology.

本文引用的文献

1
Acute stress affects peripersonal space representation in cortisol stress responders.急性应激影响皮质醇应激反应者的peri-personal 空间表征。
Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2022 Aug;142:105790. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2022.105790. Epub 2022 May 7.
2
Face masks reduce interpersonal distance in virtual reality.口罩减少虚拟现实中的人际距离。
Sci Rep. 2022 Feb 9;12(1):2213. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-06086-x.
3
Face mask use and physical distancing before and after mandatory masking: No evidence on risk compensation in public waiting lines.
神经性厌食症患者与健康受试者个人空间的定量研究:社会变量的作用及其与精神病理学的关联
Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2024 Jul-Sep;24(3):100476. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2024.100476. Epub 2024 Jun 18.
4
The social factors behind the mask: contextual effects on trait impressions from faces wearing a face mask.口罩背后的社会因素:口罩对面部特征印象的情境影响。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2024 Jun 27;9(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s41235-024-00570-w.
5
How different face mask types affect interpersonal distance perception and threat feeling in social interaction.不同类型的口罩对面部距离感知和社交互动中威胁感的影响。
Cogn Process. 2024 Aug;25(3):477-490. doi: 10.1007/s10339-024-01179-z. Epub 2024 Mar 16.
6
Perception of interpersonal distance and social distancing before and during COVID-19 pandemic.新冠肺炎疫情前后人际距离和社交距离的感知。
Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 25;14(1):4568. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-55218-y.
7
Perceived Interpersonal Distances: A Cross-Cultural Analysis of Young Taiwanese and Young Southeast Asians during the COVID-19 Pandemic.感知到的人际距离:新冠疫情期间台湾年轻人与东南亚年轻人的跨文化分析
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Dec 27;14(1):20. doi: 10.3390/bs14010020.
8
The COVID-19 pandemic and changes in social behavior: Protective face masks reduce deliberate social distancing preferences while leaving automatic avoidance behavior unaffected.**译文**:新冠疫情与社会行为变化:防护口罩减少了人们故意保持社交距离的意愿,但对自动回避行为没有影响。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2024 Jan 8;9(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s41235-023-00528-4.
9
Effects of Target Variables on Interpersonal Distance Perception for Young Taiwanese during the COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠疫情期间目标变量对台湾年轻人人际距离感知的影响。
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jun 11;11(12):1711. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11121711.
10
Refraining from interaction can decrease fear of physical closeness during COVID-19.在 COVID-19 期间,避免互动可以减少对身体亲近的恐惧。
Sci Rep. 2023 May 11;13(1):7700. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-34667-x.
强制佩戴口罩前后的口罩使用和保持社交距离:在公共等候队伍中不存在风险补偿的证据。
J Econ Behav Organ. 2021 Dec;192:765-781. doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2021.10.032. Epub 2021 Nov 20.
4
A Bayesian approach to reveal the key role of mask wearing in modulating projected interpersonal distance during the first COVID-19 outbreak.贝叶斯方法揭示了在 COVID-19 首次爆发期间,戴口罩在调节预期人际距离方面的关键作用。
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 10;16(8):e0255598. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255598. eCollection 2021.
5
Sharpening of peripersonal space during the COVID-19 pandemic.新冠疫情期间的近体空间锐化。
Curr Biol. 2021 Jul 26;31(14):R889-R890. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2021.06.001. Epub 2021 Jun 9.
6
Physical distancing and the perception of interpersonal distance in the COVID-19 crisis.新冠疫情期间的身体疏远和人际距离感知
Sci Rep. 2021 Jun 1;11(1):11485. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-90714-5.
7
Face masks reduce emotion-recognition accuracy and perceived closeness.口罩会降低情绪识别准确性和亲密度感知。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 23;16(4):e0249792. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249792. eCollection 2021.
8
Testosterone administration in women increases the size of their peripersonal space.给女性施用睾丸素会增加其个体空间的大小。
Exp Brain Res. 2021 May;239(5):1639-1649. doi: 10.1007/s00221-021-06080-1. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
9
The Interrelation Between Peripersonal Action Space and Interpersonal Social Space: Psychophysiological Evidence and Clinical Implications.个人周边行动空间与人际社会空间之间的相互关系:心理生理学证据及临床意义
Front Hum Neurosci. 2021 Feb 26;15:636124. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.636124. eCollection 2021.
10
The impact of facemasks on emotion recognition, trust attribution and re-identification.口罩对面部情绪识别、信任归因和再识别的影响。
Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 10;11(1):5577. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-84806-5.