• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

改良小柳技术一期修复近端型尿道下裂的结果:越南单一中心的一项前瞻性队列研究

Results of the one-stage proximal hypospadias repair with modified Koyanagi technique: A prospective cohort study in a single Vietnam centre.

作者信息

Vu Tuan Hong, Viet Nguyen Hoa, Quy Hong Quan, Quang Pham Hung, Thanh Pham Tung, Hai Do Đang, Đo Truong Thanh

机构信息

Department of Pediatric Surgery, Viet Duc Hospital, 40 TrangThi, Hoankiem, Hanoi, Viet Nam.

Department of General Surgery, Hanoi Medical University, Viet Nam.

出版信息

Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021 Nov 2;71:103012. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.103012. eCollection 2021 Nov.

DOI:10.1016/j.amsu.2021.103012
PMID:34840761
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8606834/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Proximal hypospadias is the most severe type of hypospadias. Our approach to Koyanagi technique for proximal hypospadias aims to improve the blood supply to the neourethral flaps and reduce meatal complications.

METHODS

Our prospective study included 75 patients who were operated for proximal hypospadias by our Koyanagi technique at Viet Duc hospital between January 2019 and December 2020. The clinical information obtained included a detailed medical history; preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data; short-term outcomes by the HOSE score were evaluated by a different physician.

RESULTS

The mean (range) age was 3.59 ± 2.41 years (1.5-14), 86.7% under 5 years old. There are 31 penoscrotal, 31 scrotal, and 13 perineal hypospadias. The length of the neourethra ranged from 3.5 to 8 cm, mean 5.02 ± 0.88 cm. Evaluation of the surgeon at 6 months after surgery: primary success 81.3%. Complications occurred in 14 cases (18.7%), included 10 urethrocutaneous fistula and 4 dehiscence of the urethra. No cases of meatal stenosis or recession, urethral stricture, urethral diverticula. The mean HOSE score was found to be 14.47 ± 1.35, ranged 11 to 16. 57 patients (76%) had a total HOSE 14 and above and 18 patients had score below 14 (24%).

CONCLUSION

Our modified Koyanagi technique give us a good result for one-stage reconstruction of proximal hypospadias. Applying the HOSE score makes postoperative evaluation of hypospadias more objective and reliable.

摘要

引言

近端型尿道下裂是尿道下裂最严重的类型。我们采用小柳技术治疗近端型尿道下裂的方法旨在改善新尿道皮瓣的血供并减少尿道口并发症。

方法

我们的前瞻性研究纳入了2019年1月至2020年12月期间在越南德医院接受小柳技术治疗近端型尿道下裂的75例患者。获得的临床信息包括详细的病史;术前、术中和术后数据;由另一位医生通过HOSE评分评估短期结果。

结果

平均(范围)年龄为3.59±2.41岁(1.5 - 14岁),86.7%在5岁以下。有31例阴茎阴囊型、31例阴囊型和13例会阴型尿道下裂。新尿道长度为3.5至8厘米,平均5.02±0.88厘米。术后6个月外科医生评估:一期成功率为81.3%。14例(18.7%)出现并发症,包括10例尿道皮肤瘘和4例尿道裂开。无尿道口狭窄或退缩、尿道狭窄、尿道憩室病例。发现平均HOSE评分为14.47±1.35,范围为11至16。57例患者(76%)的HOSE总分在14分及以上,18例患者得分低于14分(24%)。

结论

我们改良的小柳技术在近端型尿道下裂一期重建中取得了良好效果。应用HOSE评分使尿道下裂术后评估更客观、可靠。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bd0/8606834/3c74374e23b1/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bd0/8606834/bb10a80580d4/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bd0/8606834/aa035c9f7329/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bd0/8606834/351989e7efa7/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bd0/8606834/3c74374e23b1/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bd0/8606834/bb10a80580d4/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bd0/8606834/aa035c9f7329/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bd0/8606834/351989e7efa7/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bd0/8606834/3c74374e23b1/gr4.jpg

相似文献

1
Results of the one-stage proximal hypospadias repair with modified Koyanagi technique: A prospective cohort study in a single Vietnam centre.改良小柳技术一期修复近端型尿道下裂的结果:越南单一中心的一项前瞻性队列研究
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021 Nov 2;71:103012. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.103012. eCollection 2021 Nov.
2
A New Modification of the Koyanagi Technique for the One-stage Repair of Severe Hypospadias.
Urology. 2016 Jul;93:175-9. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2016.03.032. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
3
Modification of the Koyanagi Technique for the Single-Stage Repair of Proximal Hypospadias.
Ann Plast Surg. 2016 Jun;76(6):693-6. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000345.
4
Modified koyanagi repair for severe hypospadias.改良小柳修复术治疗重度尿道下裂
J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg. 2013 Jul;18(3):96-9. doi: 10.4103/0971-9261.116041.
5
Urethral Mobilisation and Glanuloplasty Technique for Primary and Second-Stage Repair of Hypospadias: A Single Hospital Experience.尿道下裂一期和二期修复的尿道游离及龟头成形术:单中心经验
Cureus. 2024 Jun 26;16(6):e63189. doi: 10.7759/cureus.63189. eCollection 2024 Jun.
6
Modification of the Koyanagi technique for the single stage repair of proximal hypospadias.
J Urol. 2000 Sep;164(3 Pt 2):973-5; discussion 976. doi: 10.1097/00005392-200009020-00013.
7
The modified Koyanagi repair for severe proximal hypospadias.
BJU Int. 2001 Feb;87(3):235-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.2001.02029.x.
8
Neo-modified Koyanagi technique for the single-stage repair of proximal hypospadias.
J Pediatr Urol. 2007 Jun;3(3):239-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2006.06.007. Epub 2006 Aug 14.
9
Koyanagi urethroplasty for proximal hypospadias: A stage procedure?
Prog Urol. 2022 Apr;32(5):312-318. doi: 10.1016/j.purol.2021.09.008. Epub 2021 Oct 20.
10
The Koyanagi-Nonomura 1-stage bucket repair of severe hypospadias with and without penoscrotal transposition.小柳-野村一期阴囊皮瓣修复重度尿道下裂(伴或不伴阴茎阴囊转位)。
J Urol. 1998 Sep;160(3 Pt 2):1104-7; discussion 1137. doi: 10.1097/00005392-199809020-00038.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk factors for postoperative complications following one-stage proximal hypospadias repair involving the disconnection of the urethral plate: a retrospective study.一期近端尿道下裂修复术(涉及尿道板离断)后发生术后并发症的危险因素:一项回顾性研究。
BMC Pediatr. 2023 Oct 7;23(1):504. doi: 10.1186/s12887-023-04339-w.
2
Current perspectives in hypospadias research: A scoping review of articles published in 2021 (Review).尿道下裂研究的当前视角:对2021年发表文章的范围综述(综述)
Exp Ther Med. 2023 Mar 23;25(5):211. doi: 10.3892/etm.2023.11910. eCollection 2023 May.
3
Staged transverse preputial island flap urethroplasty for some proximal hypospadias with moderate-to-severe chordee.

本文引用的文献

1
Two simple modifications can potentially change the future of proximal hypospadias surgery. Our series and a review of the literature.两种简单的改良方法可能会改变近端尿道下裂手术的未来。我们的系列研究及文献综述。
Int J Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2021 Sep;8(3):172-176. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpam.2020.06.005. Epub 2020 Jul 9.
2
STROCSS 2019 Guideline: Strengthening the reporting of cohort studies in surgery.STROCSS 2019 指南:加强外科学队列研究报告。
Int J Surg. 2019 Dec;72:156-165. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.11.002. Epub 2019 Nov 6.
3
Neo-yoke repair for severe hypospadias: A simple modification for better outcome.
分期横形包皮岛状皮瓣尿道成形术治疗中重度尿道下裂伴近端阴茎下弯
BMC Urol. 2021 Dec 23;21(1):182. doi: 10.1186/s12894-021-00948-8.
J Pediatr Urol. 2017 Jun;13(3):290.e1-290.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2016.11.016. Epub 2017 Jan 14.
4
A New Modification of the Koyanagi Technique for the One-stage Repair of Severe Hypospadias.
Urology. 2016 Jul;93:175-9. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2016.03.032. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
5
The contemporary role of 1 vs. 2-stage repair for proximal hypospadias.一期修复与二期修复在近端尿道下裂治疗中的当代作用。
Transl Androl Urol. 2014 Dec;3(4):347-58. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2223-4683.2014.11.04.
6
Modified koyanagi repair for severe hypospadias.改良小柳修复术治疗重度尿道下裂
J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg. 2013 Jul;18(3):96-9. doi: 10.4103/0971-9261.116041.
7
Choosing a technique for severe hypospadias.选择治疗重度尿道下裂的技术。
Afr J Paediatr Surg. 2011 Sep-Dec;8(3):286-90. doi: 10.4103/0189-6725.91668.
8
Long-term outcome of hypospadias surgery: current dilemmas.尿道下裂手术的长期疗效:当前的困境。
Curr Opin Urol. 2011 Nov;21(6):465-9. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e32834a6da3.
9
Modified Koyanagi's procedure for proximal hypospadias: our experience.改良 Koyanagi 法治疗近端型尿道下裂:我们的经验。
Int J Urol. 2010 Mar;17(3):294-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2010.02475.x.
10
Original Koyanagi urethroplasty versus modified Hayashi technique: outcome in 57 patients.
J Pediatr Urol. 2009 Aug;5(4):300-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2009.03.010. Epub 2009 May 19.