Morgan Sarah Katherine, Bangash Omar Khan, Benjanuvatra Nat, Thorburn Megan, Du Plessis Irné, Jacques Angela, Powers Georgina, Lind Christopher R P
School of Surgery (SKM, IDP), University of Western Australia; Neurosurgical Service of Western Australia (OKB, MT), Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital; School of Human Sciences (Sport Science (NB, GP), Exercise, and Health), University of Western Australia, Perth; Institute for Health Research (AJ), University of Notre Dame Australia, Fremantle; Department of Research (AJ), Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital; and School of Surgery (CRPL), University of Western Australia, Perth, and Neurosurgical Service of Western Australia, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Australia.
Neurol Clin Pract. 2021 Oct;11(5):e698-e705. doi: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000001086.
To determine whether deep brain stimulation (DBS) causes swimming impairment, we systematically compared swimming ability between DBS on vs off in 18 patients.
We conducted a randomized blinded crossover study, comparing swimming ability between DBS on vs off, within participants. Participants swam 3 laps of front crawl and 3 laps of breaststroke. Prespecifed primary outcomes were proportion of lap completed, lap time, and Aquatic Skills Proficiency Assessment (ASPA) score. Prespecified secondary outcomes were a qualitative description of marked changes observed.
Eighteen participants with Parkinson disease (n = 13), essential tremor (n = 3), Tourette syndrome (n = 1), or posttraumatic brain injury proximal tremor (n = 1), treated with posterior subthalamic area (n = 15) or globus pallidus interna (n = 3) DBS were assessed. There was no significant effect of DBS on/off status on any outcome measure for front crawl or breaststroke. Three participants showed changes in both qualitative and quantitative assessments. Of these, 1 participant displayed reduction in swimming ability: impairment in all outcomes with DBS on, normalizing with DBS off (the same individual as previously reported). The participant displayed difficulty coordinating limb movement as well as postural control. Two participants showed improvements in lap time and ASPA scores with DBS on.
Overall DBS did not impair swimming performance, although 1 patient demonstrated a stimulation-induced drowning hazard. There were no anatomic or clinical features unique to the individual with swimming impairment. Patients should be warned about the possibility of DBS-induced drowning hazard and should swim with capable supervision after DBS.
This study provides Class IV evidence that for patients with implanted DBS electrodes, the stimulation on condition, compared with stimulation off, did not significantly impair swimming performance. A formal assessment of unblinding would have been helpful.
为了确定深部脑刺激(DBS)是否会导致游泳障碍,我们系统地比较了18例患者在DBS开启和关闭状态下的游泳能力。
我们进行了一项随机双盲交叉研究,在参与者内部比较DBS开启和关闭状态下的游泳能力。参与者进行3圈自由泳和3圈蛙泳。预先设定的主要结局指标为完成的圈数比例、每圈时间和水上技能熟练度评估(ASPA)得分。预先设定的次要结局指标为观察到的明显变化的定性描述。
对18例接受丘脑底后区(n = 15)或苍白球内侧部(n = 3)DBS治疗的帕金森病患者(n = 13)、特发性震颤患者(n = 3)、抽动秽语综合征患者(n = 1)或创伤后脑损伤近端震颤患者(n = 1)进行了评估。DBS开启或关闭状态对自由泳或蛙泳的任何结局指标均无显著影响。3名参与者在定性和定量评估中均出现了变化。其中,1名参与者的游泳能力下降:DBS开启时所有结局指标均受损,DBS关闭时恢复正常(与先前报道的为同一人)。该参与者表现出肢体运动协调以及姿势控制方面的困难。2名参与者在DBS开启时每圈时间和ASPA得分有所改善。
总体而言,DBS并未损害游泳表现,尽管有1例患者表现出刺激诱发的溺水风险。游泳障碍患者没有独特的解剖学或临床特征。应告知患者DBS诱发溺水风险的可能性,并且在DBS术后游泳时应有能力胜任的人员进行监督。
本研究提供了IV级证据,表明对于植入DBS电极的患者,刺激开启状态与刺激关闭状态相比,并未显著损害游泳表现。进行非盲法的正式评估可能会有所帮助。