Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America.
Vanderbilt Epidemiology PhD Program, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 29;16(11):e0260473. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260473. eCollection 2021.
In developing countries where point-of-care testing is limited, providers rely on clinical judgement to discriminate between viral and bacterial respiratory infections. We performed a cross-sectional cohort study of hospitalized Jordanian children to evaluate antibiotic use for respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infections.
Admitting diagnoses from a prior viral surveillance cohort of hospitalized Jordanian children were dichotomized into suspected viral-like, non-pulmonary bacterial-like, and pulmonary bacterial-like infection. Stratifying by sex, we performed a polytomous logistic regression adjusting for age, underlying medical condition, maternal education, and region of residence to estimate prevalence odds ratios (PORs) for antibiotic use during hospitalization. Sensitivity and specificity of admission diagnoses and research laboratory results were compared.
Children with a suspected viral-like admission diagnosis, compared to those with suspected non-pulmonary bacterial-like, were 88% and 86% less likely to be administered an empiric/first-line antibiotic (male, aPOR: 0.12; female, aPOR: 0.14; p-value = <0.001). There were slight differences by sex with males having a lower prevalence than females in being administered an expanded coverage antibiotic; but they had a higher prevalence of macrolide administration than males with non-pulmonary bacterial-like infection. Overall, children with RSV had a 34% probability (sensitivity) of being assigned to a suspected viral-like diagnosis; whereas RSV-negative children had a 76% probability (specificity) of being assigned to a suspected pulmonary bacterial-like diagnosis.
Hospitalized children with a suspected viral-like admission diagnosis were less likely to receive an empiric/first-line and expanded coverage antibiotic compared to suspected non-pulmonary and pulmonary infections; however, when evaluating the accuracy of admission diagnosis to RSV-laboratory results there were considerable misclassifications. These results highlight the need for developing antibiotic interventions for Jordan and the rest of the Middle East.
在基层医疗检测有限的发展中国家,医疗工作者依靠临床判断来区分病毒和细菌引起的呼吸道感染。我们对约旦住院儿童进行了一项横断面队列研究,以评估呼吸道合胞病毒(RSV)感染的抗生素使用情况。
将先前约旦住院儿童病毒监测队列的入院诊断分为疑似病毒性、非肺部细菌性和肺部细菌性感染。我们按性别分层,采用多分类逻辑回归模型,调整年龄、基础疾病、母亲教育程度和居住地区等因素,估计住院期间使用抗生素的患病率优势比(POR)。比较入院诊断和研究实验室结果的敏感性和特异性。
与疑似非肺部细菌性感染相比,疑似病毒性感染的患儿接受经验性/一线抗生素治疗的可能性分别降低了 88%和 86%(男性 aPOR:0.12;女性 aPOR:0.14;p 值<0.001)。男性和女性的抗生素使用情况略有不同,男性接受扩展覆盖抗生素治疗的患病率低于女性,但与疑似非肺部细菌性感染的男性相比,接受大环内酯类抗生素治疗的患病率更高。总体而言,RSV 患儿被诊断为疑似病毒性感染的概率为 34%(敏感性);而 RSV 阴性患儿被诊断为疑似肺部细菌性感染的概率为 76%(特异性)。
与疑似非肺部和肺部感染相比,疑似病毒性入院诊断的患儿接受经验性/一线和扩展覆盖抗生素治疗的可能性较小;然而,在评估入院诊断与 RSV 实验室结果的准确性时,存在相当大的误诊。这些结果强调了为约旦和中东其他地区制定抗生素干预措施的必要性。