Suppr超能文献

家兔在丰富环境中的兼职分组饲养:对生产性能、损伤发生率及丰富环境利用的影响

Part-time grouping of rabbit does in enriched housing: effects on performances, injury occurrence and enrichment use.

作者信息

Huang Y, Breda J, Savietto D, Debrusse A-M, Combes S, Fortun-Lamothe L

机构信息

GenPhySE, Université de Toulouse, INRAE, ENVT, F-31326 Castanet-Tolosan, France.

GenPhySE, Université de Toulouse, INRAE, ENVT, F-31326 Castanet-Tolosan, France.

出版信息

Animal. 2021 Dec;15(12):100390. doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2021.100390. Epub 2021 Nov 26.

Abstract

Collective housing is perceived as a possible way to improve rabbit welfare, especially among adult females, which are normally individually housed. Part-time group housing seems to allow a better balance between welfare and health than continuous group housing, but practical implementation and consequences for reproductive performance have not been extensively studied. The aim of this work was to compare weight, feed intake, litter size, injury occurrence, body integrity, and spatial location of female rabbits housed part-time in group housing (PGH group, n = 32) or housed individually (IH group, n = 8). Females were grouped by opening connecting hatches between four individual enriched cages (platform, wood stick and gnawing block). Collective housing started 12 days after artificial insemination and was interrupted at the 10th day (instead of the 15th day later as originally planned) due to high injury rates and severe injuries caused by fighting. The proportion of injured females increased from 25% on the first day of grouping to 63% on the 10th day. Female weight gain during the experiment was similar in the two groups. Litter size at weaning was 9% lower in the PGH group than in the IH group (9.2 vs 10.0, P < 0.01). Platform use was recorded in 32% of the observations and was the highest during the 2 weeks before weaning (46% and 47% of total observations, P < 0.05). During the grouping period, there were at least two females in the same housing unit in 59.4% of the cases, at least two females were located on the same level in 31.3% of the cases. In conclusion, connecting individual cages is an ergonomic solution for part-time group housing, but does not prevent fights for the establishment of a social hierarchy. This is detrimental to the health and body integrity of female rabbits.

摘要

集体饲养被视为改善兔子福利的一种可行方式,尤其是对于成年雌性兔子,它们通常是单独饲养的。与持续集体饲养相比,兼职群居似乎能在福利和健康之间实现更好的平衡,但实际实施情况以及对繁殖性能的影响尚未得到广泛研究。这项工作的目的是比较兼职群居(PGH组,n = 32)或单独饲养(IH组,n = 8)的雌性兔子的体重、采食量、窝仔数、受伤情况、身体完整性和空间位置。通过打开四个单独的丰富笼子(平台、木棍和啃咬块)之间的连接舱口将雌性兔子分组。集体饲养在人工授精后12天开始,由于打架导致的高受伤率和严重伤害,在第10天(而不是原计划的第15天)中断。受伤雌性兔子的比例从分组第一天的25%增加到第10天的63%。两组实验期间雌性兔子的体重增加相似。PGH组断奶时的窝仔数比IH组低9%(9.2对10.0,P < 0.01)。在32%的观察记录中发现有兔子使用平台,且在断奶前2周使用频率最高(占总观察记录的46%和47%,P < 0.05)。在分组期间,59.4%的情况下同一饲养单元中至少有两只雌性兔子,31.3%的情况下至少有两只雌性兔子位于同一水平。总之,连接单个笼子是兼职群居的一种符合人体工程学的解决方案,但并不能防止为建立社会等级制度而发生的争斗。这对雌性兔子的健康和身体完整性有害。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验