Faculty of Education, Bar Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Gonda Multidisciplinary Brain Research Center, Bar Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Clin Linguist Phon. 2022 Dec 2;36(12):1132-1152. doi: 10.1080/02699206.2021.2000644. Epub 2021 Nov 29.
Bilingual language development is different from monolingual language development. The lack of appropriate assessment tools geared to the bilingual population has led to inaccurate over-diagnosis of bilingual children with typical language development (TLD) as children with Developmental Language Disorder (DLD) and under-diagnosis of bilingual children with DLD. The present paper addresses this challenge by focusing on Hebrew as a second language (L2) of bilingual preschool children whose first language (L1) is either English or Russian, taking into consideration both chronological age (CA) and age of onset of bilingualism (AOB). This study aimed to generate bilingual standards for a monolingual screening test, by arriving at appropriate bilingual typical development cut-off points. A total of 443 bilingual Hebrew speaking children (397 with TLD and 46 with DLD), ages 61-78 months ( = 70; = 4), 199 with L1 English and 244 with L1 Russian, took part in the study. The results demonstrate low diagnostic accuracy when a monolingual test with monolingual norms is used for bilingual children, in contrast with increased diagnostic accuracy when bilingual standards are used for bilingual children. The paper concludes by showing the importance of bilingual standards when assessing clinical populations with varying ages of acquisition, and in particular, for those who were exposed to their second language after the age of four.
双语语言发展与单语语言发展不同。缺乏针对双语人群的适当评估工具,导致对具有典型语言发展(TLD)的双语儿童进行了不准确的过度诊断,认为他们患有发育性语言障碍(DLD),而对具有 DLD 的双语儿童则诊断不足。本文通过关注希伯来语作为双语学龄前儿童的第二语言(L2),针对这一挑战进行了探讨,这些儿童的第一语言(L1)是英语或俄语,同时考虑到年龄(CA)和双语开始年龄(AOB)。本研究旨在通过确定适当的双语典型发展截止点,为单语筛查测试生成双语标准。共有 443 名说希伯来语的双语儿童(397 名具有 TLD,46 名具有 DLD),年龄在 61-78 个月(=70;=4)之间,其中 199 名具有英语 L1,244 名具有俄语 L1,参加了这项研究。研究结果表明,当使用具有单语规范的单语测试评估双语儿童时,诊断准确性较低,而当使用双语标准评估双语儿童时,诊断准确性则有所提高。本文最后指出,在评估具有不同习得年龄的临床人群时,双语标准非常重要,特别是对于那些在四岁以后才接触第二语言的人群。