Suppr超能文献

开具抗生素处方:一般实践中诊断检测的使用。一项基于登记的研究。

Prescribing antibiotics: the use of diagnostic tests in general practice. A register-based study.

机构信息

Research Unit of General Practice, Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.

Department of Clinical Microbiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.

出版信息

Scand J Prim Health Care. 2021 Dec;39(4):466-475. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2021.2004721. Epub 2021 Nov 30.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess (i) the pattern of antibiotic prescribing in Danish general practice, (ii) the use of diagnostic tests [point-of-care (POC) and tests analysed at the hospital laboratory (laboratory tests)], and (iii) the frequency of diagnostic testing in relation to antibiotic prescriptions.

DESIGN

Retrospective cross-sectional register-based study.

SETTING

General practice in a geographical area of Denmark covering 455,956 inhabitants.

SUBJECTS

We studied redeemed antibiotic prescriptions and performed diagnostic tests in general practice from 2013 to 2017 among inhabitants in nine selected municipalities.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Frequency of antibiotic courses. Frequency and type of diagnostic testing performed in relation to types of antibiotics.

RESULTS

A total of 783,252 antibiotic courses were redeemed from general practice with an overall decrease of 19% during 2013-2017. Diagnostic testing increased by 6% during this period. POC tests comprised the majority of performed diagnostic tests (83%) with C-reactive protein (CRP) as the most frequently used test. A 27% increase in the use of laboratory tests was observed. Tests were performed in relation to 43% of all antibiotic courses; most in relation to prescriptions for sulphonamide and trimethoprim (57%) and rarely when prescribing tetracyclines (10%). Conflicting with national guidelines, Danish GPs prescribed fluoroquinolones without performing any kind of diagnostic testing in 48% of the cases.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides an overview of the use of diagnostic tests in relation to antibiotics and creates basis for further research into the variability between types of antibiotics. The study indicates that there is room for improvement to use diagnostic tests as an aid to promote prudent antibiotic use.KEY POINTSDiagnostic tests (point-of-care or tests analysed at the hospital laboratory), can increase diagnostic certainty and lead to a reduction in antibiotic use in general practice.A decrease in antibiotic courses in general practice in Denmark was observed during 2013-2017, while the use of diagnostic tests increased.A diagnostic test was performed in relation to 43% of antibiotic courses.Only 52% of prescribed fluoroquinolones was related to a diagnostic test, conflicting with national guidelines.

摘要

目的

评估(i)丹麦普通实践中抗生素的应用模式,(ii)诊断测试[即时检测(POC)和在医院实验室分析的测试(实验室测试)]的使用情况,以及(iii)与抗生素处方相关的诊断测试的频率。

设计

回顾性横断面基于登记的研究。

地点

丹麦一个覆盖 455956 名居民的地理区域的普通实践。

受试者

我们研究了 2013 年至 2017 年在 9 个选定市的居民中普通实践中开出的抗生素处方和进行的诊断测试。

主要观察指标

抗生素疗程的频率。与抗生素类型相关的进行的诊断测试的频率和类型。

结果

2013-2017 年期间,普通实践中共开出 783252 剂抗生素,总体减少 19%。在此期间,诊断测试增加了 6%。即时检测占所进行的诊断检测的大多数(83%),其中 C 反应蛋白(CRP)是最常用的检测方法。实验室检测的使用量增加了 27%。在所有抗生素疗程中,有 43%进行了测试;在与磺胺类和甲氧苄啶(57%)相关的处方中最常见,而在四环素处方中很少见(10%)。与国家指南相矛盾的是,丹麦全科医生在开具氟喹诺酮类药物时,有 48%的情况下没有进行任何类型的诊断检测。

结论

本研究概述了抗生素治疗中诊断测试的应用,并为进一步研究不同类型抗生素之间的差异提供了基础。研究表明,有改进的空间,以使用诊断测试作为促进合理使用抗生素的辅助手段。

关键点

诊断测试(即时检测或在医院实验室分析的测试)可提高诊断的准确性,并有助于减少普通实践中的抗生素使用。

丹麦普通实践中的抗生素疗程在 2013-2017 年间减少,而诊断测试的使用增加。

诊断测试与 43%的抗生素疗程相关。

只有 52%的氟喹诺酮类处方与诊断测试有关,这与国家指南相矛盾。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a16d/8725972/a9616c850036/IPRI_A_2004721_F0001_B.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验