J Gerontol Nurs. 2021 Dec;47(12):48-56. doi: 10.3928/00989134-20211109-09. Epub 2021 Dec 1.
Despite evidence acknowledging disadvantages in care provided to older adults in rural nursing homes (NHs) in the United States, since 2010, no literature review has focused on differences in care provided in urban versus rural NHs. In the current study, we examined these differences by searching U.S. English-language peer-reviewed articles published after 2010 on differences in care quality in urban and rural NHs. We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and used the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for quality appraisal. We conducted full-text abstraction of 56 (of 286) articles, identifying 10 relevant studies. Metric specification of urban/rural location varied, and care quality measures were wide-ranging, making it difficult to interpret evidence. Limited evidence supported that rural NHs, compared to urban NHs, provided sparse mental health support and limited access to hospice care after controlling for facility and resident characteristics. Our review highlights the need for more research examining differences in quality of care between urban and rural NHs and raises several issues in current research examining urban/rural NH differences where future work is needed. [(12), 48-56.].
尽管有证据表明美国农村养老院(NH)为老年人提供的护理存在劣势,但自 2010 年以来,尚无文献综述专门关注城市与农村 NH 之间护理提供方面的差异。在当前的研究中,我们通过搜索美国 2010 年后发表的以城市和农村 NH 中的护理质量差异为主题的英文同行评审文章来研究这些差异。我们遵循系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目指南,并使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表进行质量评估。我们对 286 篇文章中的 56 篇(56/286)进行了全文摘要,确定了 10 项相关研究。城市/农村位置的度量规范存在差异,护理质量的衡量标准也多种多样,这使得解释证据变得困难。有有限的证据表明,在控制了设施和居民特征后,与城市 NH 相比,农村 NH 提供的精神健康支持较少,临终关怀服务的可及性有限。我们的综述强调了需要更多研究来检验城市和农村 NH 之间的护理质量差异,并提出了当前研究中存在的几个问题,需要进一步研究。 [(12), 48-56.]。