Suppr超能文献

“我们发现嫉妒也可能引发暴力”:卢旺达和乌干达关于嫉妒、不忠和亲密伴侣暴力之间关系的定性探索。

"We saw that jealousy can also bring violence": A qualitative exploration of the intersections between jealousy, infidelity and intimate partner violence in Rwanda and Uganda.

机构信息

Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.

Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Soc Sci Med. 2022 Jan;292:114593. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114593. Epub 2021 Nov 20.

Abstract

Efforts to prevent intimate partner violence (IPV) have been informed by emerging research on common triggers of IPV and the importance of engaging with couple dynamics. This paper reports on secondary data analysis from the qualitative evaluations of the SASA! intervention in Uganda, (conducted in 2012 involving 40 community members) and the Indashyikirwa intervention in Rwanda, (conducted between 2014 and 2018 involving 14 couples and 36 other stakeholders). It explores the under-researched linkages between romantic jealousy and IPV, and describes how these interventions mitigated it. A qualitative approach using interviews and focus groups with women and men was used. Overall, jealousy was common in both settings, and led to relationship challenges including breakdown of trust; quarrels about resources; conflict, controlling behaviours, and ultimately, physical and emotional IPV. Jealousy was seen to operate through different gendered pathways. Participants described women to question men about their whereabouts and intentions because of jealousy or the suspicion of infidelity, whereas participants described men to be jealous or suspicious of women socialising with, or attracting the attention of, other men and using violence in response. Through gender transformative strategies, SASA! and Indashyikirwa were described by participants to reduce the contribution of romantic jealousy to conflict and violence by encouraging improved relationship faithfulness and honesty; supporting reduced suspicion through improved relationship trust and communication; and identifying jealousy and suspicion of, or real infidelity, as direct triggers of IPV. While these programmes show promising results, gaps remain including a lack of standardised measures of the multidimensional concept of romantic jealousy. Recognition that programmes should be evaluated for their ability to reduce romantic jealousy when identified as a trigger for IPV in a specific context should also be emphasised. More research is also needed on the forms, gendered pathways, and consequences of romantic jealousy to inform context-specific programming.

摘要

防止亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)的努力受到了关于 IPV 常见触发因素和参与夫妻动态重要性的新兴研究的启发。本文报告了乌干达 SASA! 干预措施(2012 年进行,涉及 40 名社区成员)和卢旺达 Indashyikirwa 干预措施(2014 年至 2018 年进行,涉及 14 对夫妇和 36 名其他利益攸关方)的定性评估的二次数据分析。它探讨了浪漫嫉妒与 IPV 之间研究不足的联系,并描述了这些干预措施如何减轻这种联系。使用了对妇女和男子进行访谈和焦点小组的定性方法。总的来说,两种环境中都普遍存在嫉妒,导致关系出现挑战,包括信任破裂、关于资源的争吵、冲突、控制行为,最终导致身体和情感上的 IPV。嫉妒被认为通过不同的性别途径运作。参与者描述说,女性会因为嫉妒或怀疑不忠而询问男性的行踪和意图,而参与者则描述说,男性会因为嫉妒或怀疑女性与其他男性交往、吸引其他男性的注意以及使用暴力来回应而感到嫉妒或怀疑。通过性别转换策略,SASA! 和 Indashyikirwa 被参与者描述为通过鼓励提高关系的忠诚和诚实、通过改善关系信任和沟通来支持减少怀疑、以及将嫉妒和对不忠的怀疑或实际不忠视为 IPV 的直接触发因素,从而减少浪漫嫉妒对冲突和暴力的贡献。虽然这些方案显示出有希望的结果,但仍存在差距,包括缺乏对浪漫嫉妒这一多维度概念的标准化衡量标准。还应强调,应认识到方案应根据其在特定背景下被确定为 IPV 的触发因素时减少浪漫嫉妒的能力进行评估。还需要更多关于浪漫嫉妒的形式、性别途径和后果的研究,以为具体情况制定方案提供信息。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验