• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种基于办公室的固定随访分级系统,用于评估言语前儿童的视觉功能。

An office-based fix-and-follow grading system assessing visual function in preverbal children.

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, Pusan National University, 1-10 Ami-dong Seo-gu, Busan, 49241, South Korea.

Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, South Korea.

出版信息

BMC Ophthalmol. 2021 Nov 30;21(1):413. doi: 10.1186/s12886-021-02187-9.

DOI:10.1186/s12886-021-02187-9
PMID:34847862
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8630865/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Assessing visual function in infants is usually challenging. Fix-and-Follow is a simple and popular method for assessing early development of visual perception in infants, currently however, there is no formal reproducible method for grading the capacity of fix-and-follow. This study was to develop and validate a new fix-and-follow grading system for assessing visual function development in preverbal children.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, the fix-and-follow grades was evaluated in 21 consecutive preverbal children. Fixation was categorised as grade 1 if there was no response to the target and grade 2 if there was a response but only for < 3 s. Grades of 3 and 4 were assigned based capacities to (1) fix on a moving target for ≥3 s, and (2) shift fixation from one target to another. If only one of these two criteria was met, grade 3 was assigned. If both were met, grade 4 was assigned. Following was evaluated using smooth pursuit movement, where grade 1 indicated no movement, grade 2 partial movement, and grade 3 complete movement. Two ophthalmologists independently applied the grading method in all patients. Then one of two examiners repeated the examinations to investigate the intra-observer agreement of the grading system.

RESULTS

Intra-observer agreement was excellent (Kappa coefficient = 0.823) and inter-observer agreement was good (Kappa coefficient = 0.625). All patients who exhibited abnormal ocular movement had score discrepancy between a new fix-and-following grading examination.

CONCLUSIONS

The new fix-and-follow grading scale can be applied easily in preverbal children in an office setting, and it proved reliable and reproducible.

摘要

背景

评估婴儿的视觉功能通常具有挑战性。固视跟随是一种用于评估婴儿早期视觉感知发育的简单而流行的方法,但目前尚无正式的可重复方法来分级固视跟随的能力。本研究旨在开发和验证一种新的固视跟随分级系统,用于评估言语前儿童的视觉功能发育。

方法

在这项横断面研究中,对 21 例连续的言语前儿童进行了固视跟随分级评估。如果对目标没有反应,则将固视归类为 1 级;如果有反应,但持续时间<3 秒,则归类为 2 级。根据以下两种能力中的一种,将等级 3 和 4 分配:(1)能够固定在移动目标上≥3 秒;(2)将注视从一个目标转移到另一个目标。如果只满足这两个标准中的一个,则分配 3 级;如果都满足,则分配 4 级。随后评估平滑追踪运动,如果没有运动,则为 1 级;部分运动,则为 2 级;完全运动,则为 3 级。两位眼科医生独立地对所有患者应用分级方法。然后,其中一位检查者重复检查,以调查分级系统的观察者内一致性。

结果

观察者内一致性极好(Kappa 系数=0.823),观察者间一致性良好(Kappa 系数=0.625)。所有表现出异常眼球运动的患者在新的固视跟随分级检查中都存在评分差异。

结论

新的固视跟随分级量表可在言语前儿童的办公室环境中轻松应用,且证明具有可靠性和可重复性。

相似文献

1
An office-based fix-and-follow grading system assessing visual function in preverbal children.一种基于办公室的固定随访分级系统,用于评估言语前儿童的视觉功能。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2021 Nov 30;21(1):413. doi: 10.1186/s12886-021-02187-9.
2
Inter-Rater Agreement between Trachoma Graders: Comparison of Grades Given in Field Conditions versus Grades from Photographic Review.沙眼分级者之间的评分者间一致性:现场条件下给出的分级与照片复查分级的比较
Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2015;22(3):162-9. doi: 10.3109/09286586.2015.1035792.
3
Screening for amblyopia in preverbal children with photoscreening photographs: IV. Interobserver variability in photograph grading: origin and method of reduction.使用照片筛查法对学语前儿童进行弱视筛查:IV. 照片分级中的观察者间变异性:来源及降低方法
Binocul Vis Strabismus Q. 2005;20(2):71-80.
4
Only moderate intra- and inter-observer agreement between radiologists and surgeons when grading blunt paediatric hepatic injury on CT scan.在通过CT扫描对小儿钝性肝损伤进行分级时,放射科医生和外科医生之间仅存在中等程度的观察者内和观察者间一致性。
Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2009 Dec;19(6):392-4. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1241818.
5
Should we freeze it? Agreement on fate of borderline blastocysts is poor and does not improve with a modified blastocyst grading system.我们应该冷冻它吗?对于边缘性囊胚的命运,人们的意见分歧很大,而且使用改良的囊胚分级系统也无法改善这种情况。
Hum Reprod. 2020 May 1;35(5):1045-1053. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaa060.
6
Inter- and intra-observer variation in the histopathological reporting of cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions using a modified Bethesda grading system.使用改良的贝塞斯达分级系统对宫颈鳞状上皮内病变进行组织病理学报告时观察者间和观察者内的差异。
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998 Feb;105(2):206-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1998.tb10054.x.
7
Reproducibility of placental maturity grade classification using a dynamic ultrasonography.使用动态超声检查法对胎盘成熟度分级的可重复性
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017 Apr;30(8):987-989. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2016.1196661. Epub 2016 Jun 24.
8
Visual analogue scale for assessing breast nodularity in non-discrete lumpy breasts: the Lucknow-Cardiff breast nodularity scale.用于评估非离散性肿块性乳房中乳腺结节的视觉模拟量表:勒克瑙-卡迪夫乳腺结节量表。
Breast. 2010 Jun;19(3):238-42. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2010.02.002. Epub 2010 Mar 11.
9
The Genovese grading scale is not reliable for MR assessment of collagen meniscus implants.热那亚分级量表在用于胶原半月板植入物的磁共振成像评估时不可靠。
Knee. 2017 Jan;24(1):9-15. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2016.10.011. Epub 2016 Nov 9.
10
Inter-observer and intra-observer agreement between embryologists during selection of a single Day 5 embryo for transfer: a multicenter study.胚胎学家在挑选单个第5天胚胎进行移植时的观察者间和观察者内一致性:一项多中心研究。
Hum Reprod. 2017 Feb;32(2):307-314. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dew330. Epub 2016 Dec 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical usefulness of the baby vision test in young children and its correlation with the Snellen chart.婴幼儿视力测试在幼儿中的临床实用性及其与斯内伦视力表的相关性。
Int J Ophthalmol. 2024 Feb 18;17(2):348-352. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2024.02.18. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Neonatal Assessment Visual European Grid (NAVEG): Unveiling neurological risk.新生儿评估视觉欧洲网格(NAVEG):揭示神经学风险。
Infant Behav Dev. 2017 Nov;49:21-30. doi: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2017.06.002. Epub 2017 Jul 5.
2
Evaluation of central, steady, maintained fixation grading for predicting inter-eye visual acuity difference to diagnose and treat amblyopia in strabismic patients.评估中心、稳定、维持性注视分级,预测斜视患者双眼视力差异,以诊断和治疗弱视。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2009 Jul-Aug;57(4):281-4. doi: 10.4103/0301-4738.53052.
3
Early assessment of visual function in full term newborns.足月儿视觉功能的早期评估。
Early Hum Dev. 2008 Feb;84(2):107-13. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2007.03.010. Epub 2007 May 21.
4
Poor correlation between "fix-follow-maintain" monocular/binocular fixation pattern evaluation and presence of functional amblyopia.“注视-追随-维持”单眼/双眼注视模式评估与功能性弱视的存在之间相关性较差。
Binocul Vis Strabismus Q. 2001;16(2):85-90.
5
Interobserver agreement for measurement of grating acuity and interocular acuity differences with the teller acuity card procedure.使用视力卡片程序测量光栅视力和双眼视力差异时的观察者间一致性。
Vision Res. 1995 Jan;35(2):303-12. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(94)00113-z.
6
Visual acuity screening of preterm infants.早产儿的视力筛查
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1980 Dec;19(12):1498-505.
7
Measuring visual acuity in infants.
Surv Ophthalmol. 1981 Mar-Apr;25(5):325-32. doi: 10.1016/0039-6257(81)90158-2.
8
Ophthalmological examination of the infant. Developmental aspects.
Surv Ophthalmol. 1982 Jan-Feb;26(4):177-89. doi: 10.1016/0039-6257(82)90078-9.
9
Behavioral tests of visual acuity in infants.婴儿视力的行为测试。
Int Ophthalmol Clin. 1980 Spring;20(1):233-50. doi: 10.1097/00004397-198002010-00011.
10
Clinical applications of preferential looking measures of visual acuity.
Behav Brain Res. 1983 Oct;10(1):25-38. doi: 10.1016/0166-4328(83)90147-x.