AbbVie Ltd, Maidenhead, United Kingdom.
Gilead Sciences, Uxbridge, United Kingdom.
Clin Ther. 2022 Jan;44(1):132-138. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2021.11.001. Epub 2021 Nov 27.
The European Union regulatory framework supports development, review, authorization, and maintenance of medicines to benefit public health; however, many elements are 2 decades old and undergoing review. Scrutiny was triggered by the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, the need to support future innovative medicines, the digital transformation of data exchange, and the need to address efficiency and capacity limitations. There are also ongoing evolutions in regulatory science for medicines (eg, cell and gene therapies), medical device combinations, and software, as well as the need to fully leverage contemporary information technology (IT). Important initiatives to address these challenges include the European Medicines Agency (EMA) Regulatory Science Strategy, the EU Regulatory Network Strategy, and the Big Data Steering Group, alongside European Commission-led initiatives such as the Pharmaceutical Strategy. Dynamic regulatory assessment (DRA) is a concept that seeks to integrate these various elements to re-imagine regulatory review interactions across the product life cycle. DRA calls for iterative regulatory dialogue, data submission, and evidence assessment, enabled by contemporary IT. DRA will facilitate iterative interaction and data assessment as it accumulates over a product's life cycle, bringing significant efficiencies for all product types. The DRA concept primarily evolved through dialogue within working groups of the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations. This article describes the long-term vision of the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations and outlines important strategic elements of progress, including: aligning on a multi-stakeholder vision for DRA in the European Union and across regions; leveraging learnings from ongoing initiatives; and advancing IT, governance, and standards considerations. Ultimately, DRA should consider outcomes that deliver optimal benefits for patients in the European Union and worldwide.
欧盟监管框架支持药品的开发、审查、授权和维护,以造福公众健康;然而,许多要素已有 20 多年的历史,正在进行审查。对监管框架的审查是由 2019 年冠状病毒病大流行、支持未来创新药品的需要、数据交换的数字化转型以及提高效率和解决能力限制的需要引发的。药品(例如细胞和基因疗法)、医疗器械组合和软件的监管科学也在不断发展,需要充分利用当代信息技术(IT)。解决这些挑战的重要举措包括欧洲药品管理局(EMA)监管科学战略、欧盟监管网络战略和大数据指导小组,以及欧盟委员会主导的制药战略等举措。动态监管评估(DRA)是一个概念,旨在整合这些不同的要素,重新构想整个产品生命周期的监管审查互动。DRA 呼吁进行迭代监管对话、提交数据和评估证据,这得益于当代 IT。随着产品生命周期中数据的不断积累,DRA 将促进迭代互动和数据评估,从而为所有产品类型带来显著的效率提升。DRA 概念主要是通过欧洲制药工业联合会(EFPIA)工作组的对话演变而来的。本文描述了欧洲制药工业联合会(EFPIA)的长期愿景,并概述了进展的重要战略要素,包括:在欧盟和各地区就 DRA 的多方利益相关者愿景达成一致;从正在进行的举措中吸取经验教训;推进 IT、治理和标准考虑因素。最终,DRA 应该考虑为欧盟和全球的患者带来最佳获益的结果。