• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

推进欧盟医疗器械试验的监管监督,使其与临床药物标准保持一致。

Advancing Regulatory Oversight of Medical Device Trials to Align with Clinical Drug Standards in the European Union.

作者信息

Pannonhalmi Ádám, Sipos Bence, Kurucz Róbert Imre, Katona Gábor, Kemény Lajos, Csóka Ildikó

机构信息

Department of Dermatology and Allergology, University of Szeged, Korányi Alley 6, H-6720 Szeged, Hungary.

Institute of Pharmaceutical Technology and Regulatory Affairs, University of Szeged, Eötvös Street 6, H-6720 Szeged, Hungary.

出版信息

Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2025 Jun 12;18(6):876. doi: 10.3390/ph18060876.

DOI:10.3390/ph18060876
PMID:40573269
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12195702/
Abstract

The regulation of clinical trials for medicinal products and medical devices has undergone numerous changes in recent years in the European Union, challenging manufacturers and national regulatory agencies as well. With the introduction of combined drug-device products, the regulatory landscape has been drastically changed to adapt to novel technological advancements and innovations. A comparative analysis has not yet been published highlighting the main differences and common elements of these two medicinal products, which took up almost all of the market in the pharmaceutical sector. Due to stricter regulations in the field of medical devices, the process from application up until post-market surveillance became more difficult, but a correlation between the regulation of drug trials can also be found. The main differences lie in the risk management systems, where, regardless of the background knowledge of a drug, it is always strict and mandatory structured progress, while in the case of medical devices, it is more flexible based on the risk category of the product. Generally, the utilization of e-health opportunities, transparency, and data accessibility have been improved in both fields. Via the adaptation of the mentioned regulation in the EU, the safety of patients and the efficacy of trials have been greatly increased. This manuscript aims to compare the specific regulations of these two types of medicinal products with a brief outlook on the non-EU sector as well.

摘要

近年来,欧盟对药品和医疗器械临床试验的监管发生了诸多变化,这对制造商和国家监管机构也构成了挑战。随着联合药物-器械产品的推出,监管格局发生了巨大变化,以适应新的技术进步和创新。尚未有比较分析突出这两种几乎占据了制药行业所有市场的药品的主要差异和共同要素。由于医疗器械领域的法规更加严格,从申请到上市后监测的过程变得更加困难,但药物试验监管之间也存在相关性。主要差异在于风险管理系统,无论药物的背景知识如何,其始终是严格且强制性的结构化流程,而对于医疗器械,基于产品的风险类别则更为灵活。总体而言,两个领域在电子健康机会的利用、透明度和数据可及性方面都有所改善。通过在欧盟采用上述法规,患者安全性和试验有效性都得到了极大提高。本手稿旨在比较这两类药品的具体法规,并简要展望非欧盟领域的情况。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4f7/12195702/fd010387eeca/pharmaceuticals-18-00876-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4f7/12195702/410d0747a135/pharmaceuticals-18-00876-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4f7/12195702/fd6cdf2865d2/pharmaceuticals-18-00876-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4f7/12195702/fd010387eeca/pharmaceuticals-18-00876-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4f7/12195702/410d0747a135/pharmaceuticals-18-00876-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4f7/12195702/fd6cdf2865d2/pharmaceuticals-18-00876-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4f7/12195702/fd010387eeca/pharmaceuticals-18-00876-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Advancing Regulatory Oversight of Medical Device Trials to Align with Clinical Drug Standards in the European Union.推进欧盟医疗器械试验的监管监督,使其与临床药物标准保持一致。
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2025 Jun 12;18(6):876. doi: 10.3390/ph18060876.
2
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状Meta分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 9;1(1):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub3.
3
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
4
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
5
Single-incision sling operations for urinary incontinence in women.女性尿失禁的单切口吊带手术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 26;7(7):CD008709. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008709.pub3.
6
Comparison of the effectiveness of inhaler devices in asthma and chronic obstructive airways disease: a systematic review of the literature.吸入装置在哮喘和慢性阻塞性气道疾病中的有效性比较:文献系统评价
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(26):1-149. doi: 10.3310/hta5260.
7
Progesterone or progestogen-releasing intrauterine systems for heavy menstrual bleeding.用于治疗月经过多的孕激素或释放孕激素的宫内节育系统。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Oct 19(4):CD002126. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002126.pub2.
8
Sertindole for schizophrenia.用于治疗精神分裂症的舍吲哚。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jul 20;2005(3):CD001715. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001715.pub2.
9
Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.转移性皮肤黑色素瘤的全身治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 6;2(2):CD011123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011123.pub2.
10
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparative Preclinical Evaluation of Tuznue Versus Referent Herceptin: A Registered Trastuzumab Biosimilar.图兹努(Tuznue)与对照药赫赛汀(Herceptin)(一种已注册的曲妥珠单抗生物类似药)的临床前比较评估
Drugs R D. 2025 Mar;25(1):67-77. doi: 10.1007/s40268-025-00505-w. Epub 2025 Apr 2.
2
Re-analysis of the current status of clinical trial registration in China.中国临床试验注册现状的重新分析。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jan 31;11:1394803. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1394803. eCollection 2024.
3
Impact of Rule 11 on the European Medical Software Landscape: Analysis of EUDAMED and Further Databases Three Years After MDR Implementation.
《规则11》对欧洲医疗软件格局的影响:医疗器械法规(MDR)实施三年后对欧洲医疗器械数据库(EUDAMED)及其他数据库的分析
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2025 Mar;59(2):365-378. doi: 10.1007/s43441-025-00747-5. Epub 2025 Jan 28.
4
Use of Clinical Trial Characteristics to Estimate Costs of New Drug Development.利用临床试验特征估算新药研发成本。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jan 2;8(1):e2453275. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.53275.
5
Differential Legal Protections for Biologics vs Small-Molecule Drugs in the US.美国生物制剂与小分子药物的差别法律保护
JAMA. 2024 Dec 24;332(24):2101-2108. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.16911.
6
Innovative diagnostic technologies: navigating regulatory frameworks through advances, challenges, and future prospects.创新诊断技术:通过进展、挑战和未来前景来驾驭监管框架。
Lancet Digit Health. 2024 Dec;6(12):e934-e943. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(24)00242-5. Epub 2024 Nov 14.
7
Concordance Between Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency Review and Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare Decision Among New Drug Applications in Japan.日本药品和医疗器械局审评与厚生劳动省在新药申请审批方面的一致性。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2025 Feb;117(2):544-553. doi: 10.1002/cpt.3485. Epub 2024 Nov 8.
8
Rheumatology in the digital health era: status quo and quo vadis?数字健康时代的风湿病学:现状与未来走向?
Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2024 Dec;20(12):747-759. doi: 10.1038/s41584-024-01177-7. Epub 2024 Oct 31.
9
A scoping review of reporting gaps in FDA-approved AI medical devices.对美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)批准的人工智能医疗设备报告漏洞的范围审查。
NPJ Digit Med. 2024 Oct 3;7(1):273. doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-01270-x.
10
Evaluation of the review models and approval timelines of authorities participating in the East African Medicine Regulatory Harmonisation initiative: alignment and strategies for moving forward.参与东非药品监管协调倡议的各当局审评模式及审批时限评估:协调一致及未来推进策略
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Sep 17;11:1438041. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1438041. eCollection 2024.