Bakhsheshian Joshua, Shahrestani Shane, Buser Zorica, Hah Raymond, Hsieh Patrick C, Liu John C, Wang Jeffrey C
Department of Neurological Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Department of Neurological Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Department of Medical Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA.
Spine J. 2022 Apr;22(4):605-615. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.11.015. Epub 2021 Nov 27.
The concept of frailty has become increasingly recognized, and while patients with cancer are at increased risk for frailty, its influence on perioperative outcomes in metastatic spine tumors is uncertain. Furthermore, the impact of frailty can be confounded by comorbidities or metastatic disease burden.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of frailty and comorbidities on adverse outcomes in the surgical management of metastatic spine disease.
STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective analysis of a nationwide database to include patients undergoing spinal fusion for metastatic spine disease.
A total of 1,974 frail patients who received spinal fusion with spinal metastasis, and 1,975 propensity score matched non-frail patients.
Outcomes analyzed included mortality, complications, length of stay (LOS), nonroutine discharges and costs.
A validated binary frailty index (Johns Hopkins Adjusted Clinical Groups) was used to identify frail and non-frail groups, and propensity score-matched analysis (including demographics, comorbidities, surgical and tumor characteristics) was performed. Sub-group analysis of levels involved was performed for cervical, thoracic, lumbar and junctional spine. Multivariable-regression techniques were used to develop predictive models for outcomes using frailty and the Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (ECI).
7,772 patients underwent spinal fusion with spinal metastasis, of which 1,974 (25.4%) patients were identified as frail. Following propensity score matching for frail (n=1,974) and not-frail (n=1,975) groups, frailty demonstrated significantly greater medical complications (OR=1.58; 95% CI 1.33-1.86), surgical complications (OR=1.46; 95% CI 1.15-1.85), LOS (OR=2.65; 95% CI 2.09-3.37), nonroutine discharges (OR=1.79; 95% CI 1.46-2.20) and costs (OR=1.68; 95% CI 1.32-2.14). Differences in mortality were only observed in subgroup analysis and were greater in frail junctional and lumbar spine subgroups. Models using ECI alone (AUC=0.636-0.788) demonstrated greater predictive ability compared to those using frailty alone (AUC=0.633-0.752). However, frailty combined with ECI improved the prediction of increased LOS (AUC=0.811), cost (AUC=0.768), medical complications (AUC=0.723) and nonroutine discharges (AUC=0.718). Predictive modeling of frailty in subgroups demonstrated the greatest performance for mortality (AUC=0.750) in the lumbar spine, otherwise performed similarly for LOS, costs, complications, and discharge across subgroups.
A high prevalence of frailty existed in the current patient cohort. Frailty contributed to worse short-term adverse outcomes and could be more influential in the lumbar and junctional spine due to higher risk of deconditioning in the postoperative period. Predictions for short term outcomes can be improved by adding frailty to comorbidity indices, suggesting a more comprehensive preoperative risk stratification should include frailty.
衰弱的概念已得到越来越多的认可,虽然癌症患者发生衰弱的风险增加,但其对转移性脊柱肿瘤围手术期结局的影响尚不确定。此外,衰弱的影响可能会被合并症或转移性疾病负担所混淆。
本研究的目的是评估衰弱和合并症对转移性脊柱疾病手术治疗中不良结局的影响。
研究设计/地点:对全国性数据库进行回顾性分析,纳入因转移性脊柱疾病接受脊柱融合术的患者。
共有1974例接受脊柱转移瘤脊柱融合术的衰弱患者,以及1975例倾向评分匹配的非衰弱患者。
分析的结局包括死亡率、并发症、住院时间(LOS)、非常规出院情况和费用。
使用经过验证的二元衰弱指数(约翰霍普金斯调整临床分组)来识别衰弱和非衰弱组,并进行倾向评分匹配分析(包括人口统计学、合并症、手术和肿瘤特征)。对颈椎、胸椎、腰椎和交界性脊柱所累及的节段进行亚组分析。使用多变量回归技术,利用衰弱和埃利克斯豪泽合并症指数(ECI)建立结局预测模型。
7772例患者接受了脊柱转移瘤脊柱融合术,其中1974例(25.4%)患者被确定为衰弱。在对衰弱组(n = 1974)和非衰弱组(n = 1975)进行倾向评分匹配后,衰弱显示出明显更多的医疗并发症(OR = 1.58;95% CI 1.33 - 1.86)、手术并发症(OR = 1.46;95% CI 1.15 - 1.85)、住院时间(OR = 2.65;95% CI 2.09 - 3.37)、非常规出院情况(OR = 1.79;95% CI 1.46 - 2.20)和费用(OR = 1.68;95% CI 1.32 - 2.14)。仅在亚组分析中观察到死亡率差异,在衰弱的交界性和腰椎亚组中差异更大。单独使用ECI的模型(AUC = 0.636 - 0.788)与单独使用衰弱的模型(AUC = 0.633 - 0.752)相比,显示出更大的预测能力。然而,衰弱与ECI相结合可改善对住院时间延长(AUC = 0.811)、费用(AUC = 0.768)、医疗并发症(AUC = 0.723)和非常规出院情况(AUC = 0.718)的预测。亚组中衰弱的预测模型在腰椎中对死亡率的表现最佳(AUC = 0.750),在其他方面,各亚组在住院时间、费用、并发症和出院方面的表现相似。
当前患者队列中衰弱的患病率较高。衰弱会导致更差的短期不良结局,并且由于术后身体机能下降的风险较高,在腰椎和交界性脊柱中可能更具影响力。通过将衰弱添加到合并症指数中可以改善对短期结局的预测,这表明更全面的术前风险分层应包括衰弱。