• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

慢性和发作性偏头痛预防性干预试验的核心结局集(COSMIG):一项国际、共识驱动和多利益相关方的倡议。

Core outcome set for preventive intervention trials in chronic and episodic migraine (COSMIG): an international, consensus-derived and multistakeholder initiative.

机构信息

Warwick Research in Nursing, Division of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.

Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2021 Nov 30;11(11):e043242. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043242.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043242
PMID:34848505
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8634270/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Typically, migraine prevention trials focus on reducing migraine days. This narrow focus may not capture all that is important to people with migraine. Inconsistency in outcome selection across trials limits the potential for data pooling and evidence synthesis. In response, we describe the development of core outcome set for migraine (COSMIG).

DESIGN

A two-stage approach sought to achieve international, multistakeholder consensus on both the core domain set and core measurement set. Following construction of a comprehensive list of outcomes, expert panellists (patients, healthcare professionals and researchers) completed a three-round electronic-Delphi study to support a reduction and prioritisation of core domains and outcomes. Participants in a consensus meeting finalised the core domains and methods of assessment. All stages were overseen by an international core team, including patient research partners.

RESULTS

There was a good representation of patients (episodic migraine (n=34) and chronic migraine (n=42)) and healthcare professionals (n=33) with high response and retention rates. The initial list of domains and outcomes was reduced from >50 to 7 core domains for consideration in the consensus meeting, during which a 2-domain core outcome set was agreed.

CONCLUSION

International and multistakeholder consensus emerged to describe a two-domain core outcome set for reporting research on preventive interventions for chronic and episodic migraine: migraine-specific pain and migraine-specific quality of life. Intensity of migraine pain assessed with an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale and the frequency as the number of headache/migraine days over a specified time period. Migraine-specific quality of life assessed using the Migraine Functional Impact Questionnaire.

摘要

目的

通常情况下,偏头痛预防试验侧重于减少偏头痛天数。这种狭隘的重点可能无法捕捉到偏头痛患者的所有重要内容。试验之间结果选择的不一致限制了数据汇总和证据综合的潜力。有鉴于此,我们描述了偏头痛核心结局集(COSMIG)的制定。

设计

采用两阶段方法,旨在就核心领域集和核心测量集达成国际、多利益相关者共识。在构建了一个全面的结果清单之后,专家小组(患者、医疗保健专业人员和研究人员)完成了三轮电子德尔菲研究,以支持减少和优先考虑核心领域和结果。共识会议的参与者最终确定了核心领域和评估方法。所有阶段均由一个国际核心团队监督,包括患者研究合作伙伴。

结果

偏头痛患者(发作性偏头痛(n=34)和慢性偏头痛(n=42))和医疗保健专业人员(n=33)的代表性很好,响应率和保留率都很高。最初的领域和结果清单从>50 项减少到 7 项核心领域,供共识会议审议,期间达成了 2 项核心结果集。

结论

国际和多利益相关者达成共识,描述了用于报告慢性和发作性偏头痛预防干预研究的两项核心结果集:偏头痛特异性疼痛和偏头痛特异性生活质量。使用 11 点数字评分量表评估偏头痛疼痛强度,在指定时间段内头痛/偏头痛天数的频率作为数量。使用偏头痛功能影响问卷评估偏头痛特异性生活质量。

相似文献

1
Core outcome set for preventive intervention trials in chronic and episodic migraine (COSMIG): an international, consensus-derived and multistakeholder initiative.慢性和发作性偏头痛预防性干预试验的核心结局集(COSMIG):一项国际、共识驱动和多利益相关方的倡议。
BMJ Open. 2021 Nov 30;11(11):e043242. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043242.
2
The Core Rehabilitation Outcome Set for Single-Sided Deafness (CROSSSD) study: International consensus on outcome measures for trials of interventions for adults with single-sided deafness.单侧聋核心康复结局集(CROSSSD)研究:成人单侧聋干预试验结局测量的国际共识。
Trials. 2022 Sep 8;23(1):764. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06702-1.
3
Relevant domains, core outcome sets and measurements for implant dentistry clinical trials: The Implant Dentistry Core Outcome Set and Measurement (ID-COSM) international consensus report.种植义齿临床试验的相关领域、核心结局指标和测量:种植义齿核心结局指标和测量(ID-COSM)国际共识报告。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2023 May;34 Suppl 25:4-21. doi: 10.1111/clr.14074.
4
Relevant domains, core outcome sets and measurements for implant dentistry clinical trials: The Implant Dentistry Core Outcome Set and Measurement (ID-COSM) international consensus report.种植牙科临床试验的相关领域、核心结局指标和测量指标:种植牙科核心结局指标和测量(ID-COSM)国际共识报告。
J Clin Periodontol. 2023 May;50 Suppl 25:5-21. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13808. Epub 2023 May 4.
5
Development of a Core Outcome Set for Clinical Trials in Non-infectious Uveitis of the Posterior Segment.开发用于后部非感染性葡萄膜炎临床试验的核心结局集。
Ophthalmology. 2021 Aug;128(8):1209-1221. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2021.01.022. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
6
A core domain set for pyoderma gangrenosum trial outcomes: an international eDelphi and consensus study from the UPGRADE initiative.原发性坏疽性脓皮病试验结局的核心领域集:来自 UPGRADE 计划的国际 eDelphi 和共识研究。
Br J Dermatol. 2024 Feb 16;190(3):392-401. doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljad420.
7
European Society of Coloproctology Core Outcome Set for haemorrhoidal disease: an international Delphi study among healthcare professionals.欧洲肛肠病学会痔病核心结局集:一项针对医疗保健专业人员的国际 Delphi 研究。
Colorectal Dis. 2019 May;21(5):570-580. doi: 10.1111/codi.14553. Epub 2019 Feb 8.
8
A core outcome set for childhood epilepsy treated with ketogenic diet therapy (CORE-KDT study): International parent and health professional consensus.生酮饮食疗法治疗儿童癫痫的核心结局集(CORE-KDT研究):国际家长与健康专业人士共识
Epilepsia. 2023 Apr;64(4):919-936. doi: 10.1111/epi.17513. Epub 2023 Feb 10.
9
Development of a core outcome set for trials on induction of labour: an international multistakeholder Delphi study.制定诱导分娩试验的核心结局集:一项国际性多利益相关方德尔菲研究。
BJOG. 2018 Dec;125(13):1673-1680. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15397. Epub 2018 Sep 10.
10
Core outcome domains for lichen sclerosus: a CORALS initiative consensus statement.硬化性苔藓的核心结局领域:CORALS 倡议共识声明。
Br J Dermatol. 2023 Apr 20;188(5):628-635. doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljac145.

引用本文的文献

1
Priorities for prehabilitation for patients with upper gastrointestinal cancer: a nominal group consensus study.上消化道癌患者术前康复的优先事项:一项名义组共识研究
Support Care Cancer. 2025 Aug 18;33(9):794. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09844-5.
2
Core Outcome Sets for Pain Disorders: A Systematic Review of Research and Reporting Quality.疼痛障碍的核心结局集:研究与报告质量的系统评价
J Pain Res. 2025 Jul 28;18:3745-3756. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S533561. eCollection 2025.
3
Outcome measurement in functional neurological disorder: A qualitative study on the views of patients, caregivers and healthcare professionals.

本文引用的文献

1
Measuring health-related quality of life in chronic headache: A comparative evaluation of the Chronic Headache Quality of Life Questionnaire and Headache Impact Test (HIT-6).测量慢性头痛患者的健康相关生活质量:慢性头痛生活质量问卷和头痛影响测试(HIT-6)的比较评估。
Cephalalgia. 2021 Sep;41(10):1100-1123. doi: 10.1177/03331024211006045. Epub 2021 May 4.
2
Identifying Outcome Measures for Migraine Value-Based Contracting Using the Delphi Method.采用德尔菲法确定偏头痛基于价值的合同的结果衡量指标。
Headache. 2020 Nov;60(10):2139-2151. doi: 10.1111/head.13978. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
3
International Survey to Establish Prioritized Outcomes for Trials in People With Coronavirus Disease 2019.
功能性神经障碍的结果测量:一项关于患者、护理人员和医疗保健专业人员观点的定性研究。
J Neurol. 2025 Feb 11;272(3):189. doi: 10.1007/s00415-025-12912-9.
4
Considerations Around the Inclusion of Children and Young People's Time in Economic Evaluation: Findings from an International Delphi Study.考虑将儿童和青少年的时间纳入经济评估:来自国际德尔菲研究的发现。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2024 Nov;42(11):1267-1277. doi: 10.1007/s40273-024-01411-w. Epub 2024 Aug 17.
5
European Headache Federation (EHF) critical re-appraisal and meta-analysis of oral drugs in migraine prevention - part 4: propranolol.欧洲头痛联合会(EHF)对偏头痛预防中的口服药物的关键性再评估和荟萃分析 - 第 4 部分:普萘洛尔。
J Headache Pain. 2024 Jul 24;25(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s10194-024-01826-y.
6
Does pain self-efficacy predict, moderate or mediate outcomes in people with chronic headache; an exploratory analysis of the CHESS trial.疼痛自我效能是否能预测、缓和或调节慢性头痛患者的结局;对 CHESS 试验的探索性分析。
J Headache Pain. 2024 May 15;25(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s10194-024-01768-5.
7
Developing consensus on core outcome sets of domains for acute, the transition from acute to chronic, recurrent/episodic, and chronic pain: results of the INTEGRATE-pain Delphi process.就急性、从急性到慢性的过渡、复发/发作性以及慢性疼痛领域的核心结局集达成共识:INTEGRATE-疼痛德尔菲法的结果
EClinicalMedicine. 2023 Dec 2;66:102340. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102340. eCollection 2023 Dec.
8
Clinical effectiveness of pharmacological interventions for managing chronic migraine in adults: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.成人慢性偏头痛药物干预管理的临床效果:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
J Headache Pain. 2023 Dec 6;24(1):164. doi: 10.1186/s10194-023-01696-w.
9
European Headache Federation (EHF) critical reappraisal and meta-analysis of oral drugs in migraine prevention - part 3: topiramate.欧洲头痛联盟(EHF)对偏头痛预防中口服药物的关键重新评估和荟萃分析 - 第 3 部分:托吡酯。
J Headache Pain. 2023 Oct 10;24(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s10194-023-01671-5.
10
European Headache Federation (EHF) critical re-appraisal and meta-analysis of oral drugs in migraine prevention-part 2: flunarizine.欧洲头痛联合会(EHF)对偏头痛预防中的口服药物的关键性再评估和荟萃分析-第 2 部分:氟桂利嗪。
J Headache Pain. 2023 Sep 19;24(1):128. doi: 10.1186/s10194-023-01657-3.
国际调查为 2019 年冠状病毒病患者的临床试验确定优先结局。
Crit Care Med. 2020 Nov;48(11):1612-1621. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004584.
4
Mainstreaming public involvement in a complex research collaboration: A theory-informed evaluation.将公众参与纳入复杂研究合作的主流:一项基于理论的评估。
Health Expect. 2020 Aug;23(4):910-918. doi: 10.1111/hex.13070. Epub 2020 May 19.
5
Outcome measures for assessing the effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions in frequent episodic or chronic migraine: a Delphi study.评估非药物干预在频繁发作性或慢性偏头痛中有效性的结局指标:一项德尔菲研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 12;10(2):e029855. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029855.
6
Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: 5th annual update to a systematic review of core outcome sets for research.选择重要的健康结局用于比较效果研究:对用于研究的核心结局集的系统评价的第 5 次年度更新。
PLoS One. 2019 Dec 12;14(12):e0225980. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225980. eCollection 2019.
7
Evaluating the Psychometric Properties of the Migraine Functional Impact Questionnaire (MFIQ).评估偏头痛功能影响问卷(MFIQ)的心理计量特性。
Headache. 2019 Sep;59(8):1253-1269. doi: 10.1111/head.13569. Epub 2019 Jun 5.
8
Development of a New Tool for Evaluating the Benefit of Preventive Treatments for Migraine on Functional Outcomes - The Migraine Functional Impact Questionnaire (MFIQ).开发一种新工具评估偏头痛预防性治疗对功能结局的获益 - 偏头痛功能影响问卷(MFIQ)。
Headache. 2018 Nov;58(10):1612-1628. doi: 10.1111/head.13420. Epub 2018 Oct 30.
9
Guidelines of the International Headache Society for controlled trials of preventive treatment of chronic migraine in adults.国际头痛学会成人慢性偏头痛预防性治疗对照试验指南。
Cephalalgia. 2018 Apr;38(5):815-832. doi: 10.1177/0333102418758283. Epub 2018 Mar 4.
10
The lived experience of chronic headache: a systematic review and synthesis of the qualitative literature.慢性头痛的生活体验:定性文献的系统综述与综合分析
BMJ Open. 2017 Dec 15;7(12):e019929. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019929.