Gawryjołek Julia, Wycech Alicja, Smyk Adrianna, Krogulska Aneta
Department of Paediatrics, Allergology and Gastroenterology, Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, Poland.
Student Research Cirle, Paediatric Allergology and Gastroenterology, Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, Poland.
Postepy Dermatol Alergol. 2021 Oct;38(5):721-726. doi: 10.5114/ada.2021.106248. Epub 2021 Nov 5.
Oral food challenge is the gold standard in diagnosing food allergies; however, many testing protocols are available. The present article illustrates the difficulties associated with interpreting oral challenge tests with the example of a six-year-old boy with allergy to hen's eggs. The symptoms observed on the first day of challenge indicated a negative result; however, the consumption of the cumulative dose resulted in anaphylaxis. The interpretation of the oral food challenge can be complicated. The criteria used to determine a positive or negative result are sometimes ambiguous. An accurate interpretation of the results is key to determining correct management in children with food allergy.
口服食物激发试验是诊断食物过敏的金标准;然而,有多种检测方案可供选择。本文以一名对鸡蛋过敏的六岁男孩为例,阐述了口服激发试验结果解读的困难之处。激发试验第一天观察到的症状表明结果为阴性;然而,累积剂量的食用却导致了过敏反应。口服食物激发试验的结果解读可能很复杂。用于判定阳性或阴性结果的标准有时并不明确。准确解读结果是确定食物过敏儿童正确管理方式的关键。