Suppr超能文献

生物年龄和性别对ST段抬高型心肌梗死经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后长期预后的影响。

The influence of biological age and sex on long-term outcome after percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

作者信息

Rathod Krishnaraj S, Jones Daniel A, Jain Ajay K, Lim Pitt, MacCarthy Philip A, Rakhit Roby, Lockie Tim, Kalra Sundeep, Dalby Miles C, Malik Iqbal S, Whitbread Mark, Firoozi Sam, Bogle Richard, Redwood Simon, Cooper Jackie, Gupta Ajay, Lansky Alexandra, Wragg Andrew, Mathur Anthony, Ahluwalia Amrita

机构信息

Barts Health NHS Trust London, United Kingdom.

William Harvey Research Institute, Barts & The London School of Medicine & Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Am J Cardiovasc Dis. 2021 Oct 25;11(5):659-678. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Outcome following ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is thought to be worse in women than in age-matched men. We assessed whether such differences occur in the UK Pan-London dataset and if age, and particularly menopause, influences upon outcome.

METHODS

We undertook an observational cohort study of 26,799 STEMI patients (20,633 men, 6,166 women) between 2005-2015 at 8 centres across London, UK. Patient details were recorded at the time of the procedure into local databases using the British Cardiac Intervention Society (BCIS) PCI dataset. Primary outcome was all-cause mortality at a median follow-up of 4.1 years (IQR: 2.2-5.8 years).

RESULTS

Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated a higher mortality rate in women versus men (15.6% men vs. 25.3% women, P<0.0001). Univariate Cox analysis revealed that female sex was a predictor of all-cause mortality (HR: 1.69 95% CI: 1.59-1.82). However, after multivariate adjustment, this effect of female sex diminished (HR: 1.05 95% CI: 0.90-1.25). In a sub-group analysis, we compared the sexes separated by age into the ≤55 and the >55 year olds. Age-stratified Cox analysis revealed that female sex was a univariate predictor of all-cause mortality (HR: 1.60 95% CI: 1.25-2.05) in the ≤55 group and in the >55 group (HR: 1.38 95% CI: 1.28-1.47). However, after regression adjustment incorporating the propensity score into a proportional hazard model as a covariate, whilst female sex was not a significant predictor of all-cause mortality in the ≤55 group it was a predictor in the >55 group. Moreover, whilst age did not influence outcome in <55 group, this effect in the >55 group was correlated with age.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall women have a worse all-cause mortality following primary PCI for STEMI compared to men. However, this effect was driven predominantly by women >55 years of age since after adjusting for co-morbidities the risk in younger women did not differ significantly from that in men. These observations support the view that as women advance past the menopausal years their risk of further events following revascularization increases substantially and we suggest that routine assessment of hormonal status may improve clinical decision-making and ultimately outcome for women post-PCI.

摘要

背景

ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)后女性的预后被认为比年龄匹配的男性更差。我们评估了在英国泛伦敦数据集中是否存在此类差异,以及年龄,特别是绝经,是否会影响预后。

方法

我们对2005年至2015年间英国伦敦8个中心的26799例STEMI患者(20633例男性,6166例女性)进行了一项观察性队列研究。使用英国心脏介入学会(BCBCIS�IS)PCI数据集在手术时将患者详细信息记录到当地数据库中。主要结局是在中位随访4.1年(四分位间距:2.2 - 5.8年)时的全因死亡率。

结果

Kaplan-Meier分析显示女性的死亡率高于男性(男性为15.6%,女性为25.3%,P<0.0001)。单因素Cox分析显示女性性别是全因死亡率的一个预测因素(风险比:1.69,95%置信区间:1.59 - 1.82)。然而,经过多因素调整后,女性性别的这种影响减弱了(风险比:1.05,95%置信区间:0.90 - 1.25)。在亚组分析中,我们将年龄分为≤55岁和>55岁两组来比较性别差异。年龄分层的Cox分析显示,在≤55岁组和>55岁组中,女性性别都是全因死亡率的单因素预测因素(≤55岁组风险比:1.60,95%置信区间:1.25 - 2.05;>55岁组风险比:1.38,95%置信区间:1.28 - 1.47)。然而,在将倾向评分作为协变量纳入比例风险模型进行回归调整后,虽然女性性别在≤55岁组中不是全因死亡率的显著预测因素,但在>55岁组中却是预测因素。此外,虽然年龄在<55岁组中不影响预后,但在>55岁组中这种影响与年龄相关。

结论

总体而言,与男性相比,女性在接受STEMI直接PCI后的全因死亡率更高。然而,这种影响主要由年龄>55岁的女性驱动,因为在调整合并症后,年轻女性的风险与男性没有显著差异。这些观察结果支持这样一种观点,即随着女性进入绝经后期,她们在血管重建术后发生进一步事件的风险会大幅增加,并且我们建议对激素状态进行常规评估可能会改善临床决策,并最终改善PCI术后女性的预后。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

5
Women in interventional cardiology - patients' and operators' perspectives.介入心脏病学中的女性——患者与操作者的观点
Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej. 2023 Jun;19(2):79-81. doi: 10.5114/aic.2023.129204. Epub 2023 Jun 30.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验