• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

SIGLEC1 在疑似系统性红斑狼疮诊断中的评估。

Evaluation of SIGLEC1 in the diagnosis of suspected systemic lupus erythematosus.

机构信息

Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin.

Pediatric Pneumology, Immunology and Intensive Care Medicine, Charité University Medicine Berlin.

出版信息

Rheumatology (Oxford). 2022 Aug 3;61(8):3396-3400. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keab875.

DOI:10.1093/rheumatology/keab875
PMID:34849605
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate and compare the diagnostic accuracy of SIGLEC1, a surrogate marker of type I IFN, with established biomarkers in an inception cohort of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

METHODS

SIGLEC1 was analysed by flow cytometry in 232 patients referred to our institution with suspected SLE between October 2015 and September 2020.

RESULTS

SLE was confirmed in 76 of 232 patients (32.8 %) according to the 2019 EULAR/ACR classification criteria and their SIGLEC1 values were significantly higher compared with patients without SLE (P <0.0001). A sensitivity of 98.7 %, a specificity of 82.1 %, a negative predictive value (NPV) of 99.2 % and a positive predictive value (PPV) of 72.8 % were calculated for SIGLEC1. Adjusted to the highest reported prevalence of SLE, the NPV and PPV were >99.9 % and 0.1 %, respectively. Using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and DeLong testing, the area under the curve (AUC) for SIGLEC1 (AUC = 0.95) was significantly higher than for ANA (AUC = 0.88, P = 0.031), C3 (AUC = 0.83, P = 0.001) and C4 (AUC = 0.83, P = 0.002) but not for anti-dsDNA antibodies (AUC = 0.90, P = 0.163).

CONCLUSION

IFN-I pathway activation is detectable in almost all newly diagnosed SLE patients. Thus, a negative test result for SIGLEC1 is powerful to exclude SLE in suspected cases.

摘要

目的

评估和比较 SIGLEC1(I 型干扰素的替代标志物)与既定生物标志物在系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)的起始队列中的诊断准确性。

方法

在 2015 年 10 月至 2020 年 9 月期间,我们对 232 例疑似 SLE 患者的标本进行了流式细胞术分析。

结果

根据 2019 年 EULAR/ACR 分类标准,232 例患者中确诊为 SLE 的有 76 例(32.8%),其 SIGLEC1 值明显高于未患 SLE 的患者(P<0.0001)。SIGLEC1 的灵敏度为 98.7%,特异度为 82.1%,阴性预测值(NPV)为 99.2%,阳性预测值(PPV)为 72.8%。根据最高报道的 SLE 患病率进行校正,NPV 和 PPV 分别为>99.9%和 0.1%。使用 ROC 分析和 DeLong 检验,SIGLEC1 的曲线下面积(AUC)(AUC=0.95)明显高于 ANA(AUC=0.88,P=0.031)、C3(AUC=0.83,P=0.001)和 C4(AUC=0.83,P=0.002),但与抗 dsDNA 抗体(AUC=0.90,P=0.163)无显著差异。

结论

IFN-I 通路的激活可在几乎所有新诊断的 SLE 患者中检测到。因此,SIGLEC1 检测结果阴性有力地排除了疑似病例中的 SLE。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of SIGLEC1 in the diagnosis of suspected systemic lupus erythematosus.SIGLEC1 在疑似系统性红斑狼疮诊断中的评估。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2022 Aug 3;61(8):3396-3400. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keab875.
2
SIGLEC1 (CD169) is a sensitive biomarker for the deterioration of the clinical course in childhood systemic lupus erythematosus.SIGLEC1(CD169)是儿童系统性红斑狼疮临床病程恶化的敏感生物标志物。
Lupus. 2020 Dec;29(14):1914-1925. doi: 10.1177/0961203320965699. Epub 2020 Oct 20.
3
Are interferon-related biomarkers advantageous for monitoring disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus? A longitudinal benchmark study.干扰素相关生物标志物是否有利于监测系统性红斑狼疮的疾病活动?一项纵向基准研究。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2017 Sep 1;56(9):1618-1626. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kex220.
4
Nonrenal and renal activity of systemic lupus erythematosus: a comparison of two anti-C1q and five anti-dsDNA assays and complement C3 and C4.系统性红斑狼疮的非肾脏和肾脏活性:两种抗 C1q 和五种抗 dsDNA 检测方法以及补体 C3 和 C4 的比较。
Rheumatol Int. 2012 Aug;32(8):2445-51. doi: 10.1007/s00296-011-1962-3. Epub 2011 Jun 26.
5
Comparison of chemiluminescence microparticle immunoassay, indirect immunofluorescence assay, linear immunoassay and multiple microbead immunoassay detecting autoantibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus.化学发光微粒子免疫分析、间接免疫荧光法、线性免疫分析法和多重微球免疫分析检测系统性红斑狼疮自身抗体的比较。
Scand J Immunol. 2020 Mar;91(3):e12849. doi: 10.1111/sji.12849. Epub 2020 Jan 3.
6
Complement Activation in Patients With Probable Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Ability to Predict Progression to American College of Rheumatology-Classified Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.补体激活与可能的系统性红斑狼疮患者向美国风湿病学会分类的系统性红斑狼疮的进展预测能力。
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020 Jan;72(1):78-88. doi: 10.1002/art.41093. Epub 2019 Nov 25.
7
Assessment of a high-avidity IgG ANAs for the diagnosis and activity prediction of systemic lupus erythematosus.高亲和力IgG抗核抗体用于系统性红斑狼疮诊断及活动度预测的评估
Clin Rheumatol. 2020 Sep;39(9):2619-2629. doi: 10.1007/s10067-020-05040-4. Epub 2020 Mar 18.
8
Anti-dsDNA antibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus: A combination of two quantitative methods and the ANA pattern is the most efficient strategy of detection.系统性红斑狼疮中的抗双链DNA抗体:两种定量方法与抗核抗体模式相结合是最有效的检测策略。
J Immunol Methods. 2015 Dec;427:30-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2015.09.003. Epub 2015 Sep 25.
9
Use of a screening questionnaire for systemic lupus erythematosus among pregnant women in a Mexican population.使用一种系统性红斑狼疮筛查问卷对墨西哥人群中的孕妇进行调查。
Lupus Sci Med. 2021 Jun;8(1). doi: 10.1136/lupus-2021-000486.
10
What is the clinical significance of anti-Sm antibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus? A comparison with anti-dsDNA antibodies and C3.抗Sm抗体在系统性红斑狼疮中的临床意义是什么?与抗双链DNA抗体和C3的比较。
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2017 Jul-Aug;35(4):598-606. Epub 2017 Mar 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Potential Biomarkers in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.系统性红斑狼疮中的潜在生物标志物
JMA J. 2025 Jul 15;8(3):689-698. doi: 10.31662/jmaj.2025-0190. Epub 2025 Jul 7.
2
SIGLEC1 ubiquitination and degradation induced by MARCHF3 protects ARPE19 retinal cells from high glucose-induced oxidative stress, inflammation, and apoptosis.由MARCHF3诱导的SIGLEC1泛素化和降解可保护ARPE19视网膜细胞免受高糖诱导的氧化应激、炎症和细胞凋亡。
Int Ophthalmol. 2025 Jul 19;45(1):298. doi: 10.1007/s10792-025-03649-5.
3
Exploring CD169 Macrophages as Key Targets for Vaccination and Therapeutic Interventions.
探索CD169巨噬细胞作为疫苗接种和治疗干预的关键靶点。
Vaccines (Basel). 2025 Mar 20;13(3):330. doi: 10.3390/vaccines13030330.
4
Type I interferon biomarker in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: associations of Siglec-1 with disease activity and treatment response.特发性炎性肌病中的I型干扰素生物标志物:唾液酸结合免疫球蛋白样凝集素-1与疾病活动度及治疗反应的关联
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2025 May 1;64(5):2979-2986. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keae630.
5
Serum and urine interferon-inducible protein 10, galectin-9, and SIGLEC-1 as biomarkers of disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus.血清和尿液干扰素诱导蛋白 10、半乳糖凝集素 9 和 SIGLEC-1 作为系统性红斑狼疮疾病活动的生物标志物。
Turk J Med Sci. 2024 Jan 20;54(2):391-400. doi: 10.55730/1300-0144.5804. eCollection 2024.
6
Type I interferon pathway in pediatric systemic lupus erythematosus.儿童系统性红斑狼疮的 I 型干扰素通路。
World J Pediatr. 2024 Jul;20(7):653-668. doi: 10.1007/s12519-024-00811-4. Epub 2024 Jun 25.
7
The Role of Myositis-Specific and Myositis-Associated Autoantibodies and the Activation of Type I Interferon Pathway in the Generation of Clinical Phenotypes of Inflammatory Myopathies.肌炎特异性和肌炎相关性自身抗体及I型干扰素途径激活在炎性肌病临床表型产生中的作用
Mediterr J Rheumatol. 2023 Jun 30;34(2):275-278. doi: 10.31138/mjr.34.2.275. eCollection 2023 Jun.
8
SIGLEC-1 in Systemic Sclerosis: A Useful Biomarker for Differential Diagnosis.系统性硬化症中的唾液酸结合免疫球蛋白样凝集素-1:一种用于鉴别诊断的有用生物标志物。
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2022 Sep 28;15(10):1198. doi: 10.3390/ph15101198.