• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

实施护士主导的镇静方案后的良好结果。

Favorable Outcomes After Implementing a Nurse-Driven Sedation Protocol.

机构信息

Samantha Green is a registered nurse in the medical intensive care unit at Ascension St. John Hospital, Detroit, Michigan.

Beth A. Staffileno is a professor in the College of Nursing and Co-Director for the Center for Clinical Research and Scholarship at Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.

出版信息

Crit Care Nurse. 2021 Dec 1;41(6):29-35. doi: 10.4037/ccn2021625.

DOI:10.4037/ccn2021625
PMID:34851385
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In patients receiving mechanical ventilation, prolonged exposure to sedative and analgesic medications contributes to negative clinical outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

To reduce exposure to sedative and analgesic medications among patients receiving mechanical ventilation by implementing a nurse-driven sedation protocol.

METHODS

This quality improvement project followed a plan-do-study-act cycle. Nurses were educated on the protocol, and 30 patient medical records were reviewed both before and after protocol implementation. Data were extracted on intensive care unit length of stay, duration of mechanical ventilation, duration of continuous sedation, presence of delirium, pain, level of sedation, and performance and documentation of spontaneous awakening trials. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, the χ2 test, and calculated percent change.

RESULTS

Forty-four nurses completed protocol education. The mean (SD) duration of mechanical ventilation decreased by 26% (from 5 [3.7] days to 3.7 [3.2] days), and the mean (SD) intensive care unit length of stay decreased by 27% (from 6.3 [4.3] days to 4.6 [3.7] days). The mean (SD) duration of continuous sedation decreased by 35% (from 6419 [7241] minutes to 4178 [4507] minutes). Spontaneous awakening trials documented increased by 35% (from 57% to 77%), and spontaneous awakening trials performed increased by 92% (from 40% to 77%), a statistically significant change (P = .004).

CONCLUSION

These preliminary data suggest that implementation of a nurse-driven sedation protocol resulted in favorable outcomes by decreasing duration of mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit length of stay, and duration of continuous sedation and increasing the number of spontaneous awakening trials performed.

摘要

背景

在接受机械通气的患者中,长时间使用镇静和镇痛药物会导致负面的临床结果。

目的

通过实施护士主导的镇静方案来减少接受机械通气的患者接受镇静和镇痛药物的暴露。

方法

本质量改进项目遵循计划-执行-研究-行动(Plan-Do-Study-Act)循环。对护士进行了方案教育,并在方案实施前后回顾了 30 份患者病历。提取了重症监护病房住院时间、机械通气时间、持续镇静时间、谵妄、疼痛、镇静水平以及自主唤醒试验的表现和记录的数据。使用描述性统计、χ2 检验和计算百分比变化进行数据分析。

结果

44 名护士完成了方案教育。机械通气时间的平均(SD)减少了 26%(从 5[3.7]天减少到 3.7[3.2]天),重症监护病房住院时间的平均(SD)减少了 27%(从 6.3[4.3]天减少到 4.6[3.7]天)。持续镇静时间的平均(SD)减少了 35%(从 6419[7241]分钟减少到 4178[4507]分钟)。自主唤醒试验记录增加了 35%(从 57%增加到 77%),自主唤醒试验执行增加了 92%(从 40%增加到 77%),这是一个具有统计学意义的变化(P=0.004)。

结论

这些初步数据表明,实施护士主导的镇静方案通过减少机械通气时间、重症监护病房住院时间和持续镇静时间以及增加自主唤醒试验的执行次数,产生了有利的结果。

相似文献

1
Favorable Outcomes After Implementing a Nurse-Driven Sedation Protocol.实施护士主导的镇静方案后的良好结果。
Crit Care Nurse. 2021 Dec 1;41(6):29-35. doi: 10.4037/ccn2021625.
2
Impact of a clinical pharmacist-enforced intensive care unit sedation protocol on duration of mechanical ventilation and hospital stay.临床药师实施的重症监护病房镇静方案对机械通气时间和住院时间的影响。
Crit Care Med. 2008 Feb;36(2):427-33. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000300275.63811.B3.
3
Sedation in the intensive care unit.重症监护病房的镇静。
Minerva Anestesiol. 2012 Mar;78(3):369-80.
4
A Pediatric Sedation Protocol for Mechanically Ventilated Patients Requires Sustenance Beyond Implementation.机械通气患儿的镇静方案需要在实施之外给予维持。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2016 Aug;17(8):721-6. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000000846.
5
Protocol-directed sedation versus non-protocol-directed sedation to reduce duration of mechanical ventilation in mechanically ventilated intensive care patients.在机械通气的重症监护患者中,采用方案指导镇静与非方案指导镇静以缩短机械通气时间的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 7;1:CD009771. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009771.pub2.
6
Randomized controlled trial of interrupted versus continuous sedative infusions in ventilated children.随机对照试验中断与连续镇静输注在通气儿童。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2012 Mar;13(2):131-5. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e31820aba48.
7
An analgesia-delirium-sedation protocol for critically ill trauma patients reduces ventilator days and hospital length of stay.一种针对重症创伤患者的镇痛 - 谵妄 - 镇静方案可减少呼吸机使用天数和住院时间。
J Trauma. 2008 Sep;65(3):517-26. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318181b8f6.
8
Clinical Nurse Specialist Practice: Impact on Improving Sedation Practice in Critical Care.临床护理专家实践:对改善重症监护镇静实践的影响。
Clin Nurse Spec. 2022;36(5):264-271. doi: 10.1097/NUR.0000000000000693.
9
Daily sedation interruption versus no daily sedation interruption for critically ill adult patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation.对于需要有创机械通气的成年重症患者,每日中断镇静与不中断镇静的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jul 9;2014(7):CD009176. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009176.pub2.
10
Effect of a nursing-implemented sedation protocol on the duration of mechanical ventilation.护理实施的镇静方案对机械通气持续时间的影响。
Crit Care Med. 1999 Dec;27(12):2609-15. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199912000-00001.