Department of Nephrology, Kidney Research Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Graduate Institute of Clinical Medical Science, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 1;16(12):e0260312. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260312. eCollection 2021.
It has been a matter of much debate whether the co-administration of furosemide and albumin can achieve better diuresis and natriuresis than furosemide treatment alone. There is inconsistency in published trials regarding the effect of this combination therapy. We, therefore, conducted this meta-analysis to explore the efficacy of furosemide and albumin co-administration and the factors potentially influencing the diuretic effect of such co-administration.
In accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we searched the PubMed, Embase, Medline, and Cochrane databases. Prospective studies with adult populations which comparing the effect of furosemide and albumin co-administration with furosemide alone were included. The outcomes including diuretic effect and natriuresis effect measured by hourly urine output and hourly urine sodium excretion from both groups were extracted. Random effect model was applied for conducting meta-analysis. Subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis were performed to explore potential sources of heterogeneity of treatment effects.
By including 13 studies with 422 participants, the meta-analysis revealed that furosemide with albumin co-administration increased urine output by 31.45 ml/hour and increased urine excretion by 1.76 mEq/hour in comparison to furosemide treatment alone. The diuretic effect of albumin and furosemide co-administration was better in participants with low baseline serum albumin levels (< 2.5 g/dL) and high prescribed albumin infusion doses (> 30 g), and the effect was more significant within 12 hours after administration. Diuretic effect of co-administration was better in those with baseline Cr > 1.2 mg/dL and natriuresis effect of co-administration was better in those with baseline eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73m2.
Co-administration of furosemide with albumin might enhance diuresis and natriuresis effects than furosemide treatment alone but with high heterogeneity in treatment response. According to the present meta-analysis, combination therapy might provide advantages compared to the furosemide therapy alone in patients with baseline albumin levels lower than 2.5 g/dL or in patients receiving higher albumin infusion doses or in patients with impaired renal function. Owing to high heterogeneity and limited enrolled participants, further parallel randomized controlled trials are warranted to examine our outcome.
PROSEPRO ID: CRD42020211002; https://clinicaltrials.gov/.
呋塞米与白蛋白联合应用能否比单独使用呋塞米产生更好的利尿和利钠作用一直存在争议。已发表的试验在这种联合治疗的效果方面存在不一致性。因此,我们进行了这项荟萃分析,以探讨呋塞米与白蛋白联合应用的疗效以及可能影响这种联合治疗利尿效果的因素。
根据系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南,我们检索了 PubMed、Embase、Medline 和 Cochrane 数据库。纳入了比较呋塞米与白蛋白联合应用与单独使用呋塞米的效果的前瞻性成人人群研究。提取两组每小时尿量和每小时尿钠排泄量的利尿效果和利钠效果的结果。采用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析。进行亚组分析和敏感性分析,以探讨治疗效果异质性的潜在来源。
纳入 13 项研究共 422 名参与者,荟萃分析显示,与单独使用呋塞米相比,呋塞米与白蛋白联合应用可使尿量增加 31.45 ml/h,尿钠排泄量增加 1.76 mEq/h。在基线血清白蛋白水平较低(<2.5 g/dL)和高处方白蛋白输注剂量(>30 g)的患者中,白蛋白和呋塞米联合应用的利尿效果更好,且在给药后 12 小时内效果更为显著。联合用药的利尿效果在基线 Cr>1.2 mg/dL 的患者中更好,而联合用药的利钠效果在基线 eGFR<60 ml/min/1.73m2 的患者中更好。
与单独使用呋塞米相比,呋塞米与白蛋白联合应用可能增强利尿和利钠效果,但治疗反应存在高度异质性。根据本荟萃分析,与单独使用呋塞米相比,联合治疗可能在基线白蛋白水平低于 2.5 g/dL 的患者或接受更高白蛋白输注剂量的患者或肾功能受损的患者中具有优势。由于高度异质性和纳入的参与者有限,需要进一步进行平行随机对照试验来检验我们的结果。
PROSEPRO ID:CRD42020211002;https://clinicaltrials.gov/。