Hauswaldt Johannes, Bahls Thomas, Blumentritt Arne, Demmer Iris, Drepper Johannes, Groh Roland, Heinemann Stephanie, Hoffmann Wolfgang, Kempter Valérie, Pung Johannes, Rienhoff Otto, Schlegelmilch Falk, Wieder Philipp, Yahyapour Ramin, Hummers Eva
Institut für Allgemeinmedizin, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Göttingen, Deutschland.
Institut für Community Medicine, Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Greifswald, Deutschland.
Gesundheitswesen. 2021 Nov;83(S 02):S130-S138. doi: 10.1055/a-1676-4020. Epub 2021 Dec 1.
Objectives It is difficult to obtain longitudinal 'real world' data from ambulatory medical care in Germany in a systematic way. Our vision is a large German research data repository featuring representative, anonymized patient and outpatient health care data, longitudinal, continuously updated and across different providers, offering a perspective of linking secondary care data or additional data obtained from research cohorts, for example patient reported data or biodata, and will be accessible for other researchers. Here we report specific methods and results from the RADAR project.Methods Survey of legislation, design of technical processes and organisational solutions, with a feasibility study to evaluate technical and content functionality, acceptability and performance fitness for health services research questions.Results In 2016, a multi-disciplinary scientific team initiated the development of a privacy protection and IT security concept for data exported from the electronic medical records (EMR) of physicians' practices in line with the European General Data Protection Regulation. Technical and organisational requirements for lawful research infrastructure were developed and executed for use in a specific case, namely ̒oral anticoagulation'. In 7 Lower Saxonian general practices, 100 patients were selected by their physician and their data - reduced to 40 essential data fields - extracted from EMR via a mandatory software interface after informed consent. Still in the practice, the data were split into identifying or medical data. These were encrypted and transferred either to a trusted third party (TTP) or to a data repository, respectively. 75 patients who met our inclusion criteria (minimum of one year of oral anticoagulation treatment) received a quality-of-life questionnaire via the TTP. Of the 66 returns, 63 responses were then linked to the EMR data in the repository.Conclusion Results from RADAR project proved the technical and organisational feasibility of lawful, pseudonymised data acquisition and the linkage of questionnaires to EMR data. The protecting concepts privacy by design and data minimization (Art. 25 GDPR with Recital 78) were implemented. Without informed consent, secondary use of routine data from ambulatory care which are sufficiently anonymized but still meaningful is all but impossible under current German law.
目标 在德国,很难系统地获取来自门诊医疗的纵向“真实世界”数据。我们的愿景是建立一个大型德国研究数据存储库,其具有代表性、匿名化的患者和门诊医疗保健数据,纵向、持续更新且涵盖不同的医疗服务提供者,提供将二级医疗数据或从研究队列中获得的其他数据(例如患者报告数据或生物数据)相链接的视角,并且可供其他研究人员访问。在此,我们报告RADAR项目的具体方法和结果。
方法 对立法进行调查,设计技术流程和组织解决方案,并进行可行性研究以评估技术和内容功能、可接受性以及对卫生服务研究问题的适用性。
结果 2016年,一个多学科科学团队根据欧洲通用数据保护条例,启动了针对从医生诊所的电子病历(EMR)导出的数据的隐私保护和信息技术安全概念的开发。针对合法研究基础设施的技术和组织要求已制定并应用于一个特定案例,即“口服抗凝治疗”。在7家下萨克森州的普通诊所中,医生挑选了100名患者,并在获得知情同意后,通过强制性软件接口从EMR中提取其数据(缩减为40个基本数据字段)。这些数据仍在诊所内被分为识别数据或医疗数据。它们被加密后分别传输给一个可信第三方(TTP)或一个数据存储库。75名符合我们纳入标准(至少接受一年口服抗凝治疗)的患者通过TTP收到了一份生活质量问卷。在66份回复中,有63份回复随后与存储库中的EMR数据相链接。
结论 RADAR项目的结果证明了合法的假名数据采集以及问卷与EMR数据相链接在技术和组织上的可行性。实施了通过设计保护隐私和数据最小化(《通用数据保护条例》第25条及序言78)的概念。在没有知情同意的情况下,根据德国现行法律,几乎不可能对来自门诊护理的常规数据进行二次使用,这些数据虽已充分匿名化但仍有意义。