Clinical Psychology and Biopsychology, Department of Psychology, Catholic University Eichstätt-Ingolstadt, Ostenstraße 25, 85072, Eichstätt, Germany.
vivo international (www.vivo.org), Konstanz, Germany.
BMC Psychiatry. 2021 Dec 1;21(1):601. doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03593-5.
The gap between service need and service provision for alcohol-related disorders is highest in resource-poor countries. However, in some of these contexts, local initiatives have developed pragmatic interventions that can be carried out with limited specialized personnel. In an uncontrolled treatment study, we aimed to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, safety, costs and potential effects of an innovative locally developed community-based program (the Treatment Camp) that is based on an inpatient clinic that moves from community to community.
Out of 32 treatment-seeking individuals 25 took part in the one-week Treatment Camp that included detoxification and counseling components. Re-assessments took place 5 and 12 months after their participation. We explored the course of a wide range of alcohol-related indicators, using the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) as primary outcome complemented by a timeline follow-back approach and the Obsessive Compulsive Drinking Scale. Additionally, we assessed impaired functioning, alcohol-related stigmatization, symptoms of common mental health disorders and indicators of family functioning as reported by participants' wives and children.
All alcohol-related measures decreased significantly after the Treatment Camp and remained stable up to the 12-month-assessment with high effect sizes ranging from 0.89 to 3.49 (Hedges's g). Although 92% of the participants had lapsed at least once during the follow-up period, 67% classified below the usually applied AUDIT cutoff for hazardous drinking (≥ 8) and no one qualified for the dependent range (≥ 20) one year after treatment. Most secondary outcomes including impaired functioning, alcohol-related stigmatization, symptoms of depression and indicators of family functioning followed the same trajectory.
We found the Treatment Camp approach to be acceptable, feasible, safe and affordable (approx. 111 USD/patient) and we could obtain preliminary evidence of its efficacy. Due to its creative combination of inpatient treatment and monitoring by medical personnel with local mobility, the Treatment Camp appears to be more accessible and inclusive than other promising interventions for alcohol dependent individuals in resource-poor contexts. Effects of the approach seem to extend to interactions within families, including a reduction of dysfunctional and violent interactions.
在资源匮乏的国家,与酒精相关的疾病的服务需求与服务提供之间存在着最大的差距。然而,在这些情况下,一些地方倡议已经制定了务实的干预措施,可以在有限的专业人员的情况下实施。在一项非对照治疗研究中,我们旨在评估一种创新的、基于社区的本地开发方案(治疗营)的可行性、可接受性、安全性、成本和潜在效果,该方案基于一个从社区转移到另一个社区的住院诊所。
在 32 名寻求治疗的个体中,有 25 名参加了为期一周的治疗营,其中包括戒毒和咨询内容。在他们参与后的 5 个月和 12 个月进行重新评估。我们使用酒精使用障碍识别测试(AUDIT)作为主要结果,辅以时间线回溯法和强迫性饮酒量表,探讨了广泛的与酒精相关指标的变化。此外,我们评估了参与者的妻子和子女报告的功能障碍、与酒精相关的污名化、常见心理健康障碍的症状以及家庭功能的指标。
治疗营后,所有与酒精相关的指标均显著下降,并在 12 个月的评估中保持稳定,效果大小从 0.89 到 3.49(Hedges's g)不等。尽管在随访期间,92%的参与者至少有一次复发,但有 67%的人在危险饮酒(≥8)的通常应用 AUDIT 截点以下,且一年后没有一人符合依赖范围(≥20)。包括功能障碍、与酒精相关的污名化、抑郁症状和家庭功能的大多数次要结果也遵循相同的轨迹。
我们发现治疗营方法是可以接受的、可行的、安全的、负担得起的(每位患者约 111 美元),并且我们可以获得其疗效的初步证据。由于其将住院治疗和医务人员的监测与当地的机动性创造性地结合在一起,因此与资源匮乏环境中其他有前途的酒精依赖个体干预措施相比,治疗营似乎更容易获得和包容。该方法的效果似乎延伸到家庭内部的互动,包括减少功能失调和暴力互动。