Suppr超能文献

葡萄牙临床人群的调节和双眼视功能障碍。

Accommodative and binocular vision dysfunctions in a Portuguese clinical population.

机构信息

Centre of Physics, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal.

Clinical Practice, Braga, Portugal.

出版信息

J Optom. 2022 Oct-Dec;15(4):271-277. doi: 10.1016/j.optom.2021.10.002. Epub 2021 Nov 28.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Several studies have suggested that accommodative and non-strabismic binocular dysfunctions are commonly encountered in optometric practice. This study aims to verify whether these findings apply to a Portuguese clinical population.

METHODS

This study included consecutive nonpresbyopic subjects that came to two Portuguese optometric clinics over a period of six months. A complete visual exam was conducted and included the measurement of visual acuity (VA), refraction, near point of convergence (NPC), distance and near phoria, near and distance fusional vergences, amplitude of accommodation (AA), monocular accommodative facility (MAF), relative accommodation and lag of accommodation.

RESULTS

156 subjects with a mean age of 24.9 ± 5.3 years (from 18 to 35 years old) participated in the study. Of all subjects, 32 % presented binocular vision and/or accommodative disorders accompanied or not by refractive errors. Moreover, 21.1 % had accommodative disorders, and 10.9 % had a binocular vision dysfunction. Accommodative insufficiency (11.5 %) was the most prevalent disorder, followed by convergence insufficiency (7.1 %) and accommodative infacility (5. 8 %).

CONCLUSIONS

Clinicians should be aware that about one third of the optometric clinical population could have accommodative and/or non-strabismic binocular disorders. Accommodative insufficiency was the most prevalent dysfunction presented in the studied population, followed by accommodative infacility and convergence insufficiency.

摘要

背景

多项研究表明,调节和非斜视性双眼功能障碍在视光实践中很常见。本研究旨在验证这些发现是否适用于葡萄牙的临床人群。

方法

本研究纳入了连续的非远视受试者,他们在六个月的时间内来到两家葡萄牙视光诊所。进行了全面的视力检查,包括视力(VA)、屈光、集合近点(NPC)、远距和近距隐斜视、近距和远距融合性辐辏、调节幅度(AA)、单眼调节灵活性(MAF)、相对调节和调节滞后的测量。

结果

156 名受试者的平均年龄为 24.9 ± 5.3 岁(18 至 35 岁)。所有受试者中,32%存在双眼视觉和/或调节障碍,伴有或不伴有屈光不正。此外,21.1%存在调节障碍,10.9%存在双眼视觉功能障碍。调节不足(11.5%)是最常见的障碍,其次是集合不足(7.1%)和调节不足(5.8%)。

结论

临床医生应意识到,大约三分之一的视光临床人群可能存在调节和/或非斜视性双眼障碍。在研究人群中,调节不足是最常见的功能障碍,其次是调节不足和集合不足。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验