Ceple Ilze, Svede Aiga, Serpa Evita, Kassaliete Evita, Volberga Liva, Mikelsone Rita, Berzina Asnate, Ganebnaya Angelina, Krauze Linda, Krumina Gunta
Department of Optometry and Vision Science, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Latvia, Jelgavas Street 1, LV-1004 Riga, Latvia.
Life (Basel). 2024 Dec 25;15(1):7. doi: 10.3390/life15010007.
Uncorrected refractive error and unsatisfactory performance on several clinical accommodation and binocular vision tests are more common in children who struggle with reading. The aim of the current study is to explore the prevalence of accommodative and binocular dysfunctions in children with and without reading difficulties. Reading performance was assessed with the Acadience Reading (formerly DIBELS Next) test adjusted and validated for the Latvian language. Children with (N = 39) and without (N = 43) reading difficulties underwent thorough assessment of their subjective refraction, as well as binocular and accommodation functions. The results demonstrate no difference in the prevalence of complaints between children with and without reading difficulties (26% and 23%, respectively). However, children with reading difficulties more frequently present with significant uncorrected refractive errors and/or accommodative and binocular dysfunctions than children without reading difficulties (69% and 47%, respectively). According to the findings, even in cases where a child does not exhibit any ocular or visual complaints, a comprehensive visual function evaluation should be required for any child who struggles with reading.
在阅读方面存在困难的儿童中,未矫正的屈光不正以及在多项临床调节和双眼视觉测试中表现不佳的情况更为常见。本研究的目的是探讨有阅读困难和无阅读困难儿童中调节和双眼功能障碍的患病率。使用针对拉脱维亚语进行调整和验证的《学术阅读》(原《动态指标基础早期读写能力量表升级版》)测试来评估阅读表现。有阅读困难(N = 39)和无阅读困难(N = 43)的儿童接受了主观验光以及双眼和调节功能的全面评估。结果表明,有阅读困难和无阅读困难的儿童在主诉患病率上没有差异(分别为26%和23%)。然而,有阅读困难的儿童比无阅读困难的儿童更频繁地出现明显的未矫正屈光不正和/或调节及双眼功能障碍(分别为69%和47%)。根据研究结果,即使儿童没有任何眼部或视觉主诉,对于任何有阅读困难的儿童都应进行全面的视觉功能评估。