Suppr超能文献

调节和聚散异常的诊断方案——综述

Diagnostic Protocol for Accommodative and Vergence Anomalies - A Review.

机构信息

Department of Optometry and Vision Science, Amity Medical School, Amity University Haryana, Gurgaon, India.

Department of Optometry, Uttar Pradesh University of Medical Sciences, Saifai, India.

出版信息

J Binocul Vis Ocul Motil. 2024 Apr-Jun;74(2):48-64. doi: 10.1080/2576117X.2024.2347663. Epub 2024 Jun 20.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To review the diagnostic protocols of non-strabismic binocular vision anomalies.

METHODS

We carried out a literature search on published articles of non-strabismic accommodative and vergence anomalies in different international optometry and ophthalmology journals found in the Pubmed, ResearchGate, Google Scholar, and MEDLINE databases.

RESULTS

The diagnostic criteria and normative data from the nine articles selected show discrepancies and variability in methodologies and techniques in the overall assessment of Non-Strabismic Binocular Vision Anomalies (NSBVA). Near point of convergence measurement is the most common assessment, whereas the vergence facility is the least commonly used assessment in terms of evaluating convergence insufficiency. Near point of convergence > 10 cm alone is the most sensitive sign to detect convergence insufficiency in a community set-up but high positive relative accommodation (>3.50D) is the most sensitive sign to diagnose accommodative excess. On the other hand, monocular accommodative facility < 7 CPM has the highest sensitivity to confirm the diagnosis of accommodative infacility. This review also indicates that the more clinical signs that are included in a set of diagnostic criteria, the lower the prevalence rate for that diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no standardized and diagnostically validated protocol for the assessment of NSBVAs. Variable cutoff values obtained using different methods and the selection of diagnostic criteria by various researchers have led to discrepancies that highlight the need for diagnostic validity of available protocols (combination of tests) for each anomaly. Clinical signs such as positive relative accommodation (PRA) for accommodative excess, near point of convergence (NPC) for convergence insufficiency and monocular accommodative facility (MAF) for accommodative infacility were found to be useful diagnostic signs of these anomalies. Studies should be carried out for accommodative and vergence dysfunctions using proper designs and methods to validate diagnostic criteria for all age groups. Standardization of assessment protocol and cutoff criteria will also aid in calculating prevalence for non-strabismic binocular vision anomalies.

摘要

目的

回顾非斜视性双眼视异常的诊断方案。

方法

我们在 Pubmed、ResearchGate、Google Scholar 和 MEDLINE 数据库中,对发表于不同国际视光学和眼科学期刊的非斜视性调节和聚散异常的文献进行了检索。

结果

从 9 篇选定的文章中的诊断标准和规范数据显示,在非斜视性双眼视异常(NSBVA)的整体评估中,方法和技术存在差异和可变性。近点集合测量是最常见的评估方法,而在评估集合不足时,聚散灵活度是最不常用的评估方法。在社区环境中,仅近点集合距离>10cm 是检测集合不足最敏感的迹象,但高正相对调节(>3.50D)是诊断调节过度最敏感的迹象。另一方面,单眼调节灵活度<7CPM 对确认调节无力的诊断具有最高的敏感性。本综述还表明,在一组诊断标准中包含的临床体征越多,该诊断的患病率越低。

结论

目前还没有用于评估 NSBVAs 的标准化和诊断验证协议。使用不同方法获得的可变临界值以及不同研究人员对诊断标准的选择导致了差异,这突出了需要对现有协议(测试组合)进行诊断有效性验证,以适用于每种异常。研究发现,正相对调节(PRA)对调节过度、近点集合(NPC)对集合不足和单眼调节灵活度(MAF)对调节无力等临床体征是这些异常的有用诊断迹象。应使用适当的设计和方法开展针对调节和聚散功能障碍的研究,以验证所有年龄段的诊断标准。评估方案和临界值标准的标准化也将有助于计算非斜视性双眼视异常的患病率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验