• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于 Lloyd 模型验证日本转移性或复发性乳腺癌健康状态效用值预测准确性。

Validation of the predictive accuracy of health-state utility values based on the Lloyd model for metastatic or recurrent breast cancer in Japan.

机构信息

Breast Surgery, National Cancer Center-Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan

Research Administration Center, Showa University, Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 1;11(12):e046273. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046273.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046273
PMID:34853098
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8638153/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Although there is a lack of data on health-state utility values (HSUVs) for calculating quality-adjusted life-years in Japan, cost-utility analysis has been introduced by the Japanese government to inform decision making in the medical field since 2016.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to determine whether the Lloyd model which was a predictive model of HSUVs for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients in the UK can accurately predict actual HSUVs for Japanese patients with MBC.

DESIGN

The prospective observational study followed by the validation study of the clinical predictive model.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Forty-four Japanese patients with MBC were studied at 336 survey points.

METHODS

This study consisted of two phases. In the first phase, we constructed a database of clinical data prospectively and HSUVs for Japanese patients with MBC to evaluate the predictive accuracy of HSUVs calculated using the Lloyd model. In the second phase, Bland-Altman analysis was used to determine how accurately predicted HSUVs (based on the Lloyd model) correlated with actual HSUVs obtained using the EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level questionnaire, a preference-based measure of HSUVs in patients with MBC.

RESULTS

In the Bland-Altman analysis, the mean difference between HSUVs estimated by the Lloyd model and actual HSUVs, or systematic error, was -0.106. The precision was 0.165. The 95% limits of agreement ranged from -0.436 to 0.225. The t value was 4.6972, which was greater than the t value with 2 degrees of freedom at the 5% significance level (p=0.425).

CONCLUSIONS

There were acceptable degrees of fixed and proportional errors associated with the prediction of HSUVs based on the Lloyd model for Japanese patients with MBC. We recommend that sensitivity analysis be performed when conducting cost-effectiveness analyses with HSUVs calculated using the Lloyd model.

摘要

介绍

尽管日本缺乏用于计算质量调整生命年的健康状态效用值(HSUVs)的数据,但自 2016 年以来,日本政府已经引入了成本效用分析,以为医疗领域的决策提供信息。

目的

本研究旨在确定英国转移性乳腺癌(MBC)患者的 HSUVs 预测模型 Lloyd 模型是否能准确预测日本 MBC 患者的实际 HSUVs。

设计

前瞻性观察研究和临床预测模型的验证研究。

设置和参与者

44 名日本 MBC 患者在 336 个调查点进行了研究。

方法

本研究分为两个阶段。在第一阶段,我们前瞻性地构建了一个包含临床数据和日本 MBC 患者 HSUVs 的数据库,以评估 Lloyd 模型计算的 HSUVs 的预测准确性。在第二阶段,使用 Bland-Altman 分析来确定基于 Lloyd 模型预测的 HSUVs 与使用 EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level 问卷(一种用于评估 MBC 患者 HSUVs 的偏好测量方法)获得的实际 HSUVs 之间的相关性。

结果

在 Bland-Altman 分析中,Lloyd 模型估计的 HSUVs 与实际 HSUVs 之间的平均差异,或系统误差,为-0.106。精度为 0.165。95%的一致性区间为-0.436 至 0.225。t 值为 4.6972,大于在 5%显著水平下自由度为 2 的 t 值(p=0.425)。

结论

对于日本 MBC 患者,基于 Lloyd 模型预测 HSUVs 存在可接受的固定和比例误差。我们建议在使用 Lloyd 模型计算 HSUVs 进行成本效益分析时进行敏感性分析。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/024c/8638153/46f29334a065/bmjopen-2020-046273f05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/024c/8638153/1ebe910f46a3/bmjopen-2020-046273f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/024c/8638153/0dd03b58a52f/bmjopen-2020-046273f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/024c/8638153/875b05f2cc80/bmjopen-2020-046273f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/024c/8638153/5664743d2404/bmjopen-2020-046273f04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/024c/8638153/46f29334a065/bmjopen-2020-046273f05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/024c/8638153/1ebe910f46a3/bmjopen-2020-046273f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/024c/8638153/0dd03b58a52f/bmjopen-2020-046273f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/024c/8638153/875b05f2cc80/bmjopen-2020-046273f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/024c/8638153/5664743d2404/bmjopen-2020-046273f04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/024c/8638153/46f29334a065/bmjopen-2020-046273f05.jpg

相似文献

1
Validation of the predictive accuracy of health-state utility values based on the Lloyd model for metastatic or recurrent breast cancer in Japan.基于 Lloyd 模型验证日本转移性或复发性乳腺癌健康状态效用值预测准确性。
BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 1;11(12):e046273. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046273.
2
Changes in Health State Utility Values in Japanese Patients with End-Stage Breast Cancer.日本晚期乳腺癌患者健康状态效用值的变化
Curr Oncol. 2021 Oct 18;28(5):4203-4212. doi: 10.3390/curroncol28050356.
3
A systematic literature review of health state utility values in head and neck cancer.头颈部癌健康状态效用值的系统文献综述。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 Sep 2;15(1):174. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0748-z.
4
Systematic Review of Health State Utility Values Used in European Pharmacoeconomic Evaluations for Chronic Hepatitis C: Impact on Cost-Effectiveness Results.系统评价在欧洲慢性丙型肝炎药物经济学评价中使用的健康状态效用值:对成本效益结果的影响。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2021 Jan;19(1):29-44. doi: 10.1007/s40258-020-00600-w.
5
The impact of age on health utility values for older women with early-stage breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-regression.年龄对早期乳腺癌老年女性健康效用值的影响:系统评价和荟萃回归分析。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2022 Dec 23;20(1):169. doi: 10.1186/s12955-022-02067-w.
6
Health state utility values (QALY weights) for Huntington's disease: an analysis of data from the European Huntington's Disease Network (EHDN).亨廷顿病的健康状态效用值(QALY 权重):来自欧洲亨廷顿病网络(EHDN)的数据分析。
Eur J Health Econ. 2019 Dec;20(9):1335-1347. doi: 10.1007/s10198-019-01092-9. Epub 2019 Aug 13.
7
Health state utility values in locally advanced and metastatic breast cancer by treatment line: a systematic review.按治疗线划分的局部晚期和转移性乳腺癌的健康状态效用值:一项系统评价
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2016 Oct;16(5):549-559. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2016.1222907. Epub 2016 Aug 30.
8
9
Exploring health state utility values of parents of children with a serious illness.探索患有重病儿童的父母的健康状态效用值。
Qual Life Res. 2020 Jul;29(7):1947-1959. doi: 10.1007/s11136-020-02466-w. Epub 2020 Apr 25.
10
Toward a Centralized, Systematic Approach to the Identification, Appraisal, and Use of Health State Utility Values for Reimbursement Decision Making: Introducing the Health Utility Book (HUB).迈向以集中、系统的方法识别、评估和使用健康状态效用值来进行报销决策:引入健康效用手册 (HUB)。
Med Decis Making. 2019 May;39(4):370-378. doi: 10.1177/0272989X19837969. Epub 2019 Mar 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Mapping EORTC QLQ-C30 and FACT-G onto EQ-5D-5L index for patients with cancer.将 EORTC QLQ-C30 和 FACT-G 量表映射到癌症患者的 EQ-5D-5L 索引上。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Nov 3;18(1):354. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01611-w.
2
Prices and clinical benefit of cancer drugs in the USA and Europe: a cost-benefit analysis.美国和欧洲的癌症药物价格和临床获益:成本效益分析。
Lancet Oncol. 2020 May;21(5):664-670. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30139-X.
3
Health state utilities for metastatic breast cancer in Taiwan.台湾转移性乳腺癌的健康状态效用。
Breast. 2020 Jun;51:57-64. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2020.03.001. Epub 2020 Mar 6.
4
Impact of Adverse Events on Health Utility and Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients Receiving First-Line Chemotherapy for Metastatic Breast Cancer: Results from the SELECT BC Study.一线化疗转移性乳腺癌患者不良事件对健康效用和健康相关生活质量的影响:SELECT BC 研究结果。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2018 Feb;36(2):215-223. doi: 10.1007/s40273-017-0580-7.
5
New decision-making processes for the pricing of health technologies in Japan: The FY 2016/2017 pilot phase for the introduction of economic evaluations.日本医疗技术定价的新决策流程:2016/2017财年引入经济评估的试点阶段。
Health Policy. 2017 Aug;121(8):836-841. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.06.001. Epub 2017 Jun 23.
6
Instrument-Defined Estimates of the Minimally Important Difference for EQ-5D-5L Index Scores.仪器定义的EQ-5D-5L指数得分最小重要差异估计值。
Value Health. 2017 Apr;20(4):644-650. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.11.015. Epub 2017 Jan 10.
7
Development of an Official Guideline for the Economic Evaluation of Drugs/Medical Devices in Japan.日本药品/医疗器械经济评估官方指南的制定。
Value Health. 2017 Mar;20(3):372-378. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.08.726. Epub 2016 Oct 21.
8
Health state utility values in locally advanced and metastatic breast cancer by treatment line: a systematic review.按治疗线划分的局部晚期和转移性乳腺癌的健康状态效用值:一项系统评价
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2016 Oct;16(5):549-559. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2016.1222907. Epub 2016 Aug 30.
9
A structured review of health utility measures and elicitation in advanced/metastatic breast cancer.晚期/转移性乳腺癌健康效用测量与获取的结构化综述。
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2016 Jun 23;8:293-303. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S100448. eCollection 2016.
10
Japanese population norms for preference-based measures: EQ-5D-3L, EQ-5D-5L, and SF-6D.基于偏好的测量指标的日本人群规范:EQ-5D-3L、EQ-5D-5L和SF-6D。
Qual Life Res. 2016 Mar;25(3):707-19. doi: 10.1007/s11136-015-1108-2. Epub 2015 Aug 25.