• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

家庭感染控制:一项定性研究,探讨了在 COVID-19 大流行期间,人们对在家中遵守防护行为的看法和体验。

Infection control in the home: a qualitative study exploring perceptions and experiences of adhering to protective behaviours in the home during the COVID-19 pandemic.

机构信息

School of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, Hants, UK.

School of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, Hants, UK

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 1;11(12):e056161. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056161.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056161
PMID:34853116
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8637310/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We sought to explore people's experiences and perceptions of implementing infection control behaviours in the home during the COVID-19 pandemic, guided by an online behavioural intervention.

DESIGN

Inductive qualitative study.

SETTING

UK public during the COVID-19 pandemic.

PARTICIPANTS

Thirteen people took part in telephone interviews, and 124 completed a qualitative open-text survey. All were recruited from the public. Most survey participants were aged over 60 years, while interview participants were more distributed in age. Most reported being at increased risk from COVID-19, and were white British.

INTERVENTION

Online behavioural intervention to support infection control behaviours in the home during the COVID-19 pandemic.

DATA COLLECTION

Telephone think-aloud interviews and qualitative survey data.

DATA ANALYSIS

The think-aloud interview data and qualitative survey data were analysed independently using inductive thematic analysis. The findings were subsequently triangulated.

RESULTS

Thematic analysis of the telephone interviews generated seven themes. The themes identified from the survey data mapped well onto the interview analysis. Isolating and social distancing at home were less acceptable than cleaning and handwashing, influenced by the need for intimacy with household members. This was especially true in the absence of symptoms and when perceived risk was low. People felt more empowered when they understood that even small changes, such as spending time apart, were worthwhile to reduce exposure and lessen viral load.

CONCLUSIONS

The current study provided valuable insight into the acceptability and feasibility of protective behaviours, and how public health guidance could be incorporated into a behaviour change intervention for the public during a pandemic.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在通过在线行为干预,探索人们在 COVID-19 大流行期间在家中实施感染控制行为的体验和看法。

设计

归纳定性研究。

地点

英国 COVID-19 大流行期间的公众。

参与者

13 人参加了电话访谈,124 人完成了定性开放式文本调查。所有参与者均从公众中招募。大多数调查参与者年龄超过 60 岁,而访谈参与者年龄分布更为广泛。大多数人自述感染 COVID-19 的风险增加,且为白种人英国人。

干预措施

在线行为干预,以支持 COVID-19 大流行期间在家中的感染控制行为。

数据收集

电话边想边说访谈和定性调查数据。

数据分析

使用归纳主题分析方法对边想边说访谈数据和定性调查数据进行独立分析。随后对这些发现进行了三角分析。

结果

电话访谈的主题分析产生了七个主题。调查数据中确定的主题与访谈分析很好地吻合。在家中进行隔离和社交距离,不如清洁和洗手那样被接受,这是因为需要与家庭成员保持亲密关系。在没有症状且感知风险较低的情况下,这种情况尤其如此。当人们了解到即使是小的改变,如分开一段时间,也能减少暴露和降低病毒载量时,他们会感到更有力量。

结论

本研究深入了解了保护行为的可接受性和可行性,以及在大流行期间如何将公共卫生指南纳入公众的行为改变干预措施。

相似文献

1
Infection control in the home: a qualitative study exploring perceptions and experiences of adhering to protective behaviours in the home during the COVID-19 pandemic.家庭感染控制:一项定性研究,探讨了在 COVID-19 大流行期间,人们对在家中遵守防护行为的看法和体验。
BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 1;11(12):e056161. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056161.
2
Pregnant women's experiences of social distancing behavioural guidelines during the Covid-19 pandemic 'lockdown' in the UK, a qualitative interview study.英国新冠疫情“封城”期间孕妇对社交隔离行为准则的体验:一项定性访谈研究。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Jun 23;21(1):1202. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11202-z.
3
Older people's early experience of household isolation and social distancing during COVID-19.老年人在 COVID-19 期间早期经历的家庭隔离和社交距离措施。
J Clin Nurs. 2020 Nov;29(21-22):4387-4402. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15485. Epub 2020 Sep 13.
4
Care-home Nurses' responses to the COVID-19 pandemic: Managing ethical conundrums at personal cost: A qualitative study.养老院护士对 COVID-19 大流行的反应:以个人代价应对伦理困境:一项定性研究。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2023 Jan;55(1):226-238. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12855. Epub 2022 Dec 4.
5
Intersecting factors of disadvantage and discrimination and their effect on daily life during the coronavirus pandemic: the CICADA-ME mixed-methods study.新冠疫情期间不利因素与歧视的交叉影响及其对日常生活的作用:CICADA-ME混合方法研究
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Feb;13(2):1-185. doi: 10.3310/KYTF4381.
6
Seeking mental health support for feelings of perinatal depression and/or anxiety during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative descriptive study of decision-making.在 COVID-19 大流行期间寻求心理健康支持以应对围产期抑郁和/或焦虑:一项关于决策的定性描述性研究。
Womens Health (Lond). 2024 Jan-Dec;20:17455057241282258. doi: 10.1177/17455057241282258.
7
Social distancing and mental health two years into a global pandemic: a sequential exploratory mixed-methods investigation in Hong Kong.全球大流行两年后的社交距离与心理健康:香港一项序贯探索性混合方法调查
BMJ Open. 2025 Mar 13;15(3):e092160. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-092160.
8
Factors influencing uptake of protective behaviours by healthcare workers in England during the COVID-19 pandemic: A theory-based mixed-methods study.影响英格兰医护人员在 COVID-19 大流行期间采取防护行为的因素:基于理论的混合方法研究。
PLoS One. 2024 May 9;19(5):e0299823. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299823. eCollection 2024.
9
Public perceptions and experiences of social distancing and social isolation during the COVID-19 pandemic: a UK-based focus group study.公众对 COVID-19 大流行期间社交距离和社交隔离的看法和体验:一项基于英国的焦点小组研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jul 20;10(7):e039334. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039334.
10
Students' Views towards Sars-Cov-2 Mass Asymptomatic Testing, Social Distancing and Self-Isolation in a University Setting during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Qualitative Study.学生对 COVID-19 大流行期间大学环境中 SARS-CoV-2 大规模无症状检测、社交距离和自我隔离的看法:一项定性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 15;18(8):4182. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18084182.

引用本文的文献

1
Patients understanding, perceptions and experiences of head and neck lymphoedema management following treatment for head and neck cancer: a qualitative study.头颈癌治疗后患者对头颈淋巴水肿管理的理解、认知和体验:一项定性研究。
Support Care Cancer. 2025 Jun 25;33(7):625. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09668-3.
2
Psychological experience of university students during prolonged quarantine in China: a qualitative study.中国大学生长期隔离期间的心理体验:一项定性研究
BMJ Open. 2024 Mar 11;14(3):e077483. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077483.
3
Applying machine-learning to rapidly analyze large qualitative text datasets to inform the COVID-19 pandemic response: comparing human and machine-assisted topic analysis techniques.运用机器学习技术快速分析大规模定性文本数据集,为新冠疫情应对提供信息:比较人工和机器辅助的主题分析技术。
Front Public Health. 2023 Oct 31;11:1268223. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1268223. eCollection 2023.
4
Exploring the impact of shielding advice on the wellbeing of individuals identified as clinically extremely vulnerable amid the COVID-19 pandemic: a mixed-methods evaluation.探讨在 COVID-19 大流行期间,针对被临床认定为极脆弱的个体的屏蔽建议对其健康的影响:一项混合方法评估。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Nov 22;22(1):2145. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14368-2.
5
The Rapid Adaptation and Optimisation of a Digital Behaviour-Change Intervention to Reduce the Spread of COVID-19 in Schools.快速调整和优化数字行为改变干预措施,以减少学校 COVID-19 的传播。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 31;19(11):6731. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19116731.
6
Experiences and perceptions of social eating for patients living with and beyond head and neck cancer: a qualitative study.头颈部癌症患者及其康复后社会进食体验和看法的定性研究。
Support Care Cancer. 2022 May;30(5):4129-4137. doi: 10.1007/s00520-022-06853-6. Epub 2022 Jan 24.
7
Adapting Behavioral Interventions for a Changing Public Health Context: A Worked Example of Implementing a Digital Intervention During a Global Pandemic Using Rapid Optimisation Methods.适应不断变化的公共卫生环境的行为干预措施:在全球大流行期间使用快速优化方法实施数字干预的实例研究。
Front Public Health. 2021 Apr 26;9:668197. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.668197. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Preventing within household transmission of Covid-19: is the provision of accommodation to support self-isolation feasible and acceptable?预防家庭内部新冠病毒传播:为支持自我隔离而提供住宿是否可行和可接受?
BMC Public Health. 2021 Sep 8;21(1):1641. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11666-z.
2
Engagement With Daily Testing Instead of Self-Isolating in Contacts of Confirmed Cases of SARS-CoV-2: A Qualitative Analysis.参与每日检测而非在新冠确诊病例密切接触者中进行自我隔离:一项定性分析。
Front Public Health. 2021 Aug 3;9:714041. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.714041. eCollection 2021.
3
Adapting Behavioral Interventions for a Changing Public Health Context: A Worked Example of Implementing a Digital Intervention During a Global Pandemic Using Rapid Optimisation Methods.适应不断变化的公共卫生环境的行为干预措施:在全球大流行期间使用快速优化方法实施数字干预的实例研究。
Front Public Health. 2021 Apr 26;9:668197. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.668197. eCollection 2021.
4
Primary Care implementation of Germ Defence, a digital behaviour change intervention to improve household infection control during the COVID-19 pandemic: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.基层医疗实施 Germ Defence,一项数字行为改变干预措施,以改善 COVID-19 大流行期间的家庭感染控制:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Apr 9;22(1):263. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05188-7.
5
Attitudes, current behaviours and barriers to public health measures that reduce COVID-19 transmission: A qualitative study to inform public health messaging.减少 COVID-19 传播的公共卫生措施的态度、现状和障碍:一项旨在为公共卫生信息传递提供依据的定性研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 19;16(2):e0246941. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246941. eCollection 2021.
6
Infection Control Behavior at Home During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Observational Study of a Web-Based Behavioral Intervention (Germ Defence).新冠疫情期间家庭内的感染控制行为:基于网络的行为干预(Germ Defence)的观察性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Feb 25;23(2):e22197. doi: 10.2196/22197.
7
Understanding patterns of adherence to COVID-19 mitigation measures: a qualitative interview study.理解 COVID-19 缓解措施的依从模式:一项定性访谈研究。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2021 Sep 22;43(3):508-516. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdab005.
8
Psychosocial challenges and concerns of COVID-19: A qualitative study in Iran.新冠疫情带来的心理社会挑战和问题:伊朗的一项定性研究。
Health (London). 2022 Nov;26(6):702-719. doi: 10.1177/1363459320976752. Epub 2020 Dec 7.
9
Public perceptions and experiences of social distancing and social isolation during the COVID-19 pandemic: a UK-based focus group study.公众对 COVID-19 大流行期间社交距离和社交隔离的看法和体验:一项基于英国的焦点小组研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jul 20;10(7):e039334. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039334.
10
Reduction of secondary transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in households by face mask use, disinfection and social distancing: a cohort study in Beijing, China.戴口罩、消毒和社交隔离措施降低家庭中 SARS-CoV-2 的二次传播:中国北京的一项队列研究。
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 May;5(5). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002794.