Centre for People and Organisation, School of Management, Swansea University, Swansea, UK
Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
BMJ Open. 2020 Jul 20;10(7):e039334. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039334.
This study explored UK public perceptions and experiences of social distancing and social isolation related to the COVID-19 pandemic.
This qualitative study comprised five focus groups, carried out online during the early stages of the UK's stay at home order ('lockdown'), and analysed using a thematic approach.
Focus groups took place via online videoconferencing.
Participants (n=27) were all UK residents aged 18 years and older, representing a range of gender, ethnic, age and occupational backgrounds.
Qualitative analysis revealed four main themes: (1) loss-participants' loss of (in-person) social interaction, loss of income and loss of structure and routine led to psychological and emotional 'losses' such as loss of motivation, loss of meaning and loss of self-worth; (2) criticisms of government communication-participants reported a lack of trust in government and a lack of clarity in the guidelines around social distancing and isolation; (3) adherence-participants reported high self-adherence to social distancing guidelines but reported seeing or hearing of non-adherence in others; (4) uncertainty around social reintegration and the future-some participants felt they would have lingering concerns over social contact while others were eager to return to high levels of social activity.Most participants, and particularly those in low-paid or precarious employment, reported feeling that the social distancing and isolation associated with COVID-19 policy has had negative impacts on their mental health and well-being during the early stages of the UK's 'lockdown'.
A rapid response is necessary in terms of public health programming to mitigate the mental health impacts of COVID-19 social distancing and isolation. Social distancing and isolation 'exit strategies' must account for the fact that, although some individuals will voluntarily or habitually continue to socially distance, others will seek high levels of social engagement as soon as possible.
本研究探讨了英国公众对与 COVID-19 大流行相关的社交距离和社交隔离的看法和体验。
本定性研究包括五个焦点小组,在英国居家令(“封锁”)早期阶段在线进行,并采用主题分析方法进行分析。
焦点小组通过在线视频会议进行。
参与者(n=27)均为年龄在 18 岁及以上的英国居民,代表了不同的性别、种族、年龄和职业背景。
定性分析揭示了四个主要主题:(1)损失-参与者失去了(面对面)社交互动、收入和结构与常规,导致了心理和情感上的“损失”,如失去动力、失去意义和失去自我价值感;(2)对政府沟通的批评-参与者报告说,他们对政府缺乏信任,对社交距离和隔离的指导方针缺乏明确性;(3)遵守情况-参与者报告说,他们高度遵守社交距离准则,但报告说在其他人身上看到或听到了不遵守的情况;(4)对社会重新融合和未来的不确定性-一些参与者感到他们在社会接触方面会有挥之不去的担忧,而另一些则渴望恢复高水平的社会活动。大多数参与者,尤其是那些低薪或不稳定就业的人,报告说在英国“封锁”的早期阶段,社交距离和隔离措施对他们的心理健康和幸福感产生了负面影响。
在公共卫生规划方面需要迅速作出反应,以减轻 COVID-19 社交距离和隔离对心理健康的影响。社交距离和隔离的“退出策略”必须考虑到这样一个事实,即尽管一些人会自愿或习惯性地继续保持社交距离,但其他人会尽快寻求高水平的社交参与。