Suppr超能文献

氧化锆增强型硅酸锂的粘结强度是否低于二硅酸锂?——系统评价和荟萃分析。

Is the bond strength of zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate lower than that of lithium disilicate? - A systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Fujian Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases & Fujian Provincial Engineering Research Center of Oral Biomaterial & Stomatological Key Laboratory of Fujian College and University, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.

Department of Applied Prosthodontics, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan.

出版信息

J Prosthodont Res. 2022 Oct 7;66(4):530-537. doi: 10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_20_00112. Epub 2021 Dec 1.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This study systematically reviewed the literature to compare the bond strength of resin composites with that of zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate (ZLS) and lithium disilicate (LD).

STUDY SELECTION

This review was structured based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA 2020) statement. This study was registered at the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42021256900). Studies were searched via PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases without language or publication year limits. In vitro studies that evaluated the bond strength of the resin composites to ZLS and LD were included. The risk of bias in all the included articles was evaluated. Statistical analyses were performed using the Review Manager software (version 5.3, Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, UK).

RESULTS: Of the 90 potentially related articles, the full texts of 16 articles were evaluated after screening. Finally, seven 
studies were included in the qualitative synthesis and meta-analysis. All the studies presented a medium risk of bias. The results showed no significant difference in bond strength between the ZLS and LD groups (P = 0.94, mean difference=0.08, and 95% confidence interval=-1.93 to 2.10). However, a significant difference was found in the subgroup analysis considering different types of aging treatments (P = 0.0008) and different types of bond strength tests (P < 0.00001).

CONCLUSION

The bond strength of resin composites was found to be similar to that of ZLS and LD, but different aging treatments and bond strength tests exhibited varying effects on the bond strength.

摘要

目的

本研究系统地回顾了文献,比较了树脂复合材料与氧化锆增强硅酸锂(ZLS)和硅酸二锂(LD)的粘结强度。

研究选择

本综述基于系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA 2020)声明构建。本研究在国际前瞻性系统评价注册库(CRD42021256900)进行了注册。通过 PubMed、Web of Science 和 Google Scholar 数据库进行了研究检索,无语言或出版年限限制。纳入了评估树脂复合材料与 ZLS 和 LD 粘结强度的体外研究。评估了所有纳入文章的偏倚风险。使用 Review Manager 软件(版本 5.3,Cochrane 协作,英国牛津)进行了统计分析。

结果

在 90 篇潜在相关文章中,经过筛选后评估了 16 篇文章的全文。最后,7 项研究纳入定性综合和荟萃分析。所有研究均存在中度偏倚风险。结果表明,ZLS 组和 LD 组的粘结强度无显著差异(P = 0.94,平均差值=0.08,95%置信区间=-1.93 至 2.10)。然而,在考虑不同类型老化处理(P = 0.0008)和不同类型粘结强度测试(P < 0.00001)的亚组分析中发现了显著差异。

结论

树脂复合材料的粘结强度与 ZLS 和 LD 相似,但不同的老化处理和粘结强度测试对粘结强度的影响不同。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验