Karaokutan Isil, Ozel Gulsum Sayin
Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Pamukkale University, Denizli, Turkey.
Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey.
J Adv Prosthodont. 2022 Apr;14(2):78-87. doi: 10.4047/jap.2022.14.2.78. Epub 2022 Apr 27.
This study aimed to compare the effect of different surface treatments and luting agent types on the shear bond strength of two ceramics to commercially pure titanium (Cp Ti).
A total of 160 Cp Ti specimens were divided into 4 subgroups (n = 40) according to surface treatments received (control, 50 µm airborne-particle abrasion, 110 µm airborne-particle abrasion, and tribochemical coating). The cementation surfaces of titanium and all-ceramic specimens were treated with a universal primer. Two cubic all-ceramic discs (lithium disilicate ceramic (LDC) and zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate ceramic (ZLC)) were cemented to titanium using two types of resin-based luting agents: self-cure and dual-cure (n = 10). After cementation, all specimens were subjected to 5000 cycles of thermal aging. A shear bond strength (SBS) test was conducted, and the failure mode was determined using a scanning electron microscope. Data were analyzed using three-way ANOVA, and the Tukey-HSD test was used for post hoc comparisons ( < .05).
Significant differences were found among the groups based on surface treatment, resin-based luting agent, and ceramic type ( < .05). Among the surface treatments, 50 µm air-abrasion showed the highest SBS, while the control group showed the lowest. SBS was higher for dual-cure resin-based luting agent than self-cure luting agent. ZLC showed better SBS values than LDC.
The cementation of ZLC with dual-cure resin-based luting agent showed better bonding effectiveness to commercially pure titanium treated with 50 µm airborne-particle abrasion.
本研究旨在比较不同表面处理和粘接剂类型对两种陶瓷与商业纯钛(Cp Ti)之间剪切粘结强度的影响。
根据接受的表面处理(对照组、50 µm空气颗粒研磨、110 µm空气颗粒研磨和摩擦化学涂层)将总共160个Cp Ti标本分为4个亚组(n = 40)。钛和全陶瓷标本的粘接表面用通用底漆处理。使用两种类型的树脂基粘接剂(自固化和双固化,n = 10)将两个立方全陶瓷盘(二硅酸锂陶瓷(LDC)和氧化锆增强二硅酸锂陶瓷(ZLC))粘接到钛上。粘接后,所有标本进行5000次热老化循环。进行剪切粘结强度(SBS)测试,并使用扫描电子显微镜确定失效模式。数据使用三因素方差分析进行分析,并使用Tukey-HSD检验进行事后比较(<.05)。
基于表面处理、树脂基粘接剂和陶瓷类型,各亚组之间存在显著差异(<.05)。在表面处理中,50 µm空气研磨显示出最高的SBS,而对照组显示出最低的SBS。双固化树脂基粘接剂的SBS高于自固化粘接剂。ZLC显示出比LDC更好的SBS值。
用双固化树脂基粘接剂粘接ZLC对经50 µm空气颗粒研磨处理的商业纯钛显示出更好的粘接效果。