Immunochemistry Department, PPD Laboratories, 2244 Dabney Road, Richmond, Virginia, 23230-3323, USA.
Product Quality and Immunogenicity, Office of Biotechnology Products, Office of Pharmaceutical Quality, Center for Drugs Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, 20903, USA.
AAPS J. 2021 Dec 1;24(1):4. doi: 10.1208/s12248-021-00649-y.
Evolving immunogenicity assay performance expectations and a lack of harmonized anti-drug antibody validation testing and reporting tools have resulted in significant time spent by health authorities and sponsors on resolving filing queries. Following debate at the American Association of Pharmaceutical Sciences National Biotechnology Conference, a group was formed to address these gaps. Over the last 3 years, 44 members from 29 organizations (including 5 members from Europe and 10 members from FDA) discussed gaps in understanding immunogenicity assay requirements and have developed harmonization tools for use by industry scientists to facilitate filings to health authorities. Herein, this team provides testing and reporting strategies and tools for the following assessments: (1) pre-study validation cut point; (2) in-study cut points, including procedures for applying cut points to mixed populations; (3) system suitability control criteria for in-study plate acceptance; (4) assay sensitivity, including the selection of an appropriate low positive control; (5) specificity, including drug and target tolerance; (6) sample stability that reflects sample storage and handling conditions; (7) assay selectivity to matrix components, including hemolytic, lipemic, and disease state matrices; (8) domain specificity for multi-domain therapeutics; (9) and minimum required dilution and extraction-based sample processing for titer reporting.
不断变化的免疫原性检测性能预期,以及缺乏标准化的抗药物抗体验证检测和报告工具,导致了药品监管机构和申办方在解决申报问题上花费了大量时间。在美国制药科学协会全国生物技术会议上进行了辩论之后,成立了一个小组来解决这些差距。在过去的 3 年中,来自 29 个组织的 44 名成员(包括 5 名来自欧洲的成员和 10 名来自 FDA 的成员)讨论了对免疫原性检测要求的理解差距,并为行业科学家开发了用于向药品监管机构申报的标准化工具。在此,该团队为以下评估提供了测试和报告策略和工具:(1)研究前验证截止值;(2)研究中截止值,包括将截止值应用于混合人群的程序;(3)研究中板接受的系统适用性控制标准;(4)检测灵敏度,包括选择适当的低阳性对照;(5)特异性,包括药物和靶标耐受性;(6)反映样品储存和处理条件的样品稳定性;(7)基质成分的检测选择性,包括溶血、脂血和疾病状态基质;(8)多结构域治疗药物的结构域特异性;(9)以及用于滴度报告的最小必需稀释和基于提取的样品处理。