Chen Fangfang, He Xiaolong, Mao Yan, Coble Kelly
Bioanalytical Sciences, DMPK, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Ridgefield, CT, USA.
Bioanalysis. 2025 Apr;17(8):537-548. doi: 10.1080/17576180.2025.2501937. Epub 2025 May 10.
Monitoring immune responses to therapeutic peptides with endogenous counterparts is crucial for evaluating drug safety and efficacy. In this paper, we focused on the selection of an optimal assay format to develop a sensitive, robust, and drug-tolerant immunoassay for the detection of anti-drug antibody (ADA) against a therapeutic peptide.
We assessed distinct ADA assay formats for preclinical and clinical studies, such as direct binding with labeled protein A/G, direct binding with labeled multiple species-specific antibodies for detection, bridging and affinity capture elution (ACE) formats. The assay formats were evaluated based on multiple assay parameters including sensitivity, drug tolerance, individual matrix variability and inter-assay precision. Overall, direct binding assay with labeled protein A/G for detection, which utilized less labeled peptide drug and achieved desired sensitivity and drug tolerance, is appropriate for preclinical studies. Bridging assay is more suitable format to support clinical studies as bridging assay has less assay variability than ACE assay.
This study highlighted advantages and limitations of each ADA assay format for peptide drugs and evaluated the performance of different assay formats in the assay development process to aid in the selection of the best fit-for-purpose assay formats for preclinical and clinical phases.
监测治疗性肽与内源性对应物的免疫反应对于评估药物安全性和疗效至关重要。在本文中,我们着重于选择一种最佳检测形式,以开发一种灵敏、稳健且耐药物的免疫测定法,用于检测针对治疗性肽的抗药物抗体(ADA)。
我们评估了用于临床前和临床研究的不同ADA检测形式,如与标记的蛋白A/G直接结合、与标记的多种物种特异性抗体直接结合用于检测、桥接和亲和捕获洗脱(ACE)形式。基于包括灵敏度、药物耐受性、个体基质变异性和批间精密度在内的多个检测参数对这些检测形式进行了评估。总体而言,用于检测的与标记蛋白A/G的直接结合测定法使用较少的标记肽药物,并达到了所需的灵敏度和药物耐受性,适用于临床前研究。桥接测定法更适合支持临床研究,因为桥接测定法的检测变异性比ACE测定法小。
本研究突出了每种肽药物ADA检测形式的优缺点,并在检测开发过程中评估了不同检测形式的性能,以帮助选择最适合临床前和临床阶段的检测形式。